Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

iemanja

(53,031 posts)

22. It's shameful

Reply to gab13by13 (Reply #20)

Fri Dec 3, 2021, 07:18 PM

Dec 2021

The entire argument is absurd.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court mulls: Was Trump's reply to rape claim part of job? [View all] turbinetree Dec 2021 OP

Oh ffs Fullduplexxx Dec 2021 #1

Pithy comment. Does it actually have any useful content? erronis Dec 2021 #5

Oh, ffs, it's a perfectly fine post. intheflow Dec 2021 #11

So for us neophytes, we need to spend time looking up "ffs"? And does that help the conversation? erronis Dec 2021 #14

If you didn't know what it meant, intheflow Dec 2021 #16

You're also ignoring that the original comment had no context. Just a "ffs". erronis Dec 2021 #24

FFS is self-explanatory to anyone who's been conscious and online more than 45 seconds Orrex Dec 2021 #25

Thank you Fullduplexxx Dec 2021 #30

I never saw the term before but understood right away what it meant. Peregrine Took Dec 2021 #32

LOL Beartracks Dec 2021 #37

It's a perfect response Karma13612 Dec 2021 #29

+100 Peregrine Took Dec 2021 #33

My first thought was ffs too! Next word I thought of was "ridiculous." Greybnk48 Dec 2021 #7

Exactly.. thank you Fullduplexxx Dec 2021 #31

Agreed. dchill Dec 2021 #21

Agree 100% Karma13612 Dec 2021 #28

I do not have any idea what it means, and I won't bother looking it up. marie999 Dec 2021 #34

You forgot the harumph ....well You're not missing anything Fullduplexxx Dec 2021 #35

Who in current Justice Dept. is behind this? Who? paleotn Dec 2021 #2

Doesn't sound like DOJ is on board, but rather could be decided by a GQP judge groundloop Dec 2021 #8

Three judge court with one Trump and two Clinton appointees. onenote Dec 2021 #18

"Justice Department lawyer Mark Freeman" iemanja Dec 2021 #13

Does that mean the president of the USA is a KING? That is what it sounds like... Escurumbele Dec 2021 #3

Our DOJ in action. Scrivener7 Dec 2021 #4

Dept of Justice my foot. The DOJ should NOT be defending Trump. What he said was horrible Trueblue1968 Dec 2021 #10

WOW! i couldn't agree MORE bluestarone Dec 2021 #19

what a film-flam rurallib Dec 2021 #6

Wonkette was liveblogging the hearing Zorro Dec 2021 #9

Thanks elleng Dec 2021 #12

Aside from the Tax Bill that Mitch put in front of him Dan Dec 2021 #15

I wonder if they would be taking this same tact if it was over the rape of a child. nt chowder66 Dec 2021 #17

Goes to show, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #20

It's shameful iemanja Dec 2021 #22

Ahem. This is all ridiculous. In 2016 We The People elected H. R. Clinton as abqtommy Dec 2021 #23

It Is Said That A Good Lawyer Can Indict A Ham Sandwich Before A Grand Jury DallasNE Dec 2021 #26

You are correct, gab13by13 Dec 2021 #27

If TFG is the defendant, he has to pay his legal bills. If the court rules LastLiberal in PalmSprings Dec 2021 #36

He isn't in prison yet? twodogsbarking Dec 2021 #38