Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)

8. Except it is not clear that the ballot pictured is ambigous.

Reply to thesquanderer (Reply #3)

Sun May 16, 2021, 05:33 PM

May 2021

It is only ambiguous if you have somebody crossing out vote targets. Just because there is bleed through does not affect a scanners counting unless the ballot is stupidly printed in a way so that targets on side line up with the other.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court Of Appeals To Hear Arguments In Lawsuit That Seeks Public's Right To Realistic View Of Ballot [View all] Judi Lynn May 2021 OP

4 years ago I voted in Pa gab13by13 May 2021 #1

re: summation of the point of this article thesquanderer May 2021 #3

Except it is not clear that the ballot pictured is ambigous. TomCADem May 2021 #8

*Something* made the ballot subject to adjudication. thesquanderer May 2021 #9

OK now I get it, gab13by13 May 2021 #2

Here, a Sharpie type pen is provided in the polling booth csziggy May 2021 #6

And gee.... They voted Republican. Grins May 2021 #4

Interesting LeftInTX May 2021 #5

Big Woo. There is some bleed through. TomCADem May 2021 #7