Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,887 posts)
22. From what I gather
Fri Aug 7, 2020, 09:33 AM
Aug 2020

at least from my state (PA) and those surrounding it, the state UE systems were set up so that people needing to receive benefits had to actually login (or I guess call if they had no computer/internet access) WEEKLY to "renew", and many apparently didn't realize that and ended up being dropped off. Meanwhile those trying to call weekly had difficulty even getting through.

And yes, I believe that "actively looking" threshold is there and either not correctly answering that question (notably in the electronic systems) actually resulted in a number of people being kicked off.

So I think in reality, there are more than 32 million out there who would be eligible, including those who are likely legitimately unemployed, but who couldn't navigate a way into the state UE system (whether via a computer system or by contact with a state service rep) and/or who didn't understand the "weekly renewal" requirements.

LINKS TO SOME BLS DATA SERIES NUMBERS AND GRAPHS progree Aug 2020 #1
As your economic gloom and doom Dawg... maddogesq Aug 2020 #26
Yup, I agree. Today's report is yet another in a series of "horrible but not as horrible as progree Aug 2020 #28
Beat me by a few seconds! BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #2
Oh, sorry. I was waiting for you, but I didn't see you. Next month.... mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2020 #4
That's 'cause I was trying to see if WaPo had any more than those initial 2 paragraphs BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #6
Nope. I don't get it ahead of time. I don't see it until 8:30 a.m. NT mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2020 #8
Right but you still had to copy all that for the post! BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #14
I wish that the BLS would go back to the old way of doing things. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2020 #18
16.3 million unemployed but 32.1 million continuing claims for unemployment benefits progree Aug 2020 #13
"Will be interesting if the fucking worthless media ever tackles this one." BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #16
The thing is, the BLS 16.3 million is just a household survey where they ask a question about how progree Aug 2020 #19
From what I gather BumRushDaShow Aug 2020 #22
I'd be relieved to see the DOL tackle this one. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2020 #21
Links to earlier reports: mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2020 #3
Good news. So much for disincentive to work huh? underpants Aug 2020 #5
Not really. 10% UE is really bad. Yavin4 Aug 2020 #20
Yeah I know. underpants Aug 2020 #23
I'm assuming this throws water on the $600 durablend Aug 2020 #7
Actually no ..... Iliyah Aug 2020 #11
Wait until conditions of accepting government PPP loans have expired... Freethinker65 Aug 2020 #9
Saving the banks and elites by printing money and buying financial assets bucolic_frolic Aug 2020 #10
U.S. adds 1.8 million jobs in July as hiring slows after fresh coronavirus outbreak UpInArms Aug 2020 #12
The U-6 rate only includes those who have looked for work in the past 12 months progree Aug 2020 #15
Forgive me... SergeStorms Aug 2020 #17
One surprising thing is they compare a lot of their stats to the February levels progree Aug 2020 #24
There's no need to search. See the third reply. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2020 #25
Thanks! Oh, I know, I was searching on "February" in your OP to find all the times they reference progree Aug 2020 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nonfarm payroll employmen...»Reply #22