Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
23. Clearly Rep. Akin's area of expertise.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 02:22 PM
Sep 2012

My guess is not only would he give visitation rights, but he would also give the rapist a pat on the back and a hearty congratulations on being a legitimate father.

When the child is 18 if they choose to want to meet them Fearless Sep 2012 #1
fight it all the way and see how the nation can do this to women and girls. makes me sick. nt seabeyond Sep 2012 #2
Hell no Downtown Hound Sep 2012 #3
I think not! mysuzuki2 Sep 2012 #4
If a child rapist is not allowed to be around children, HockeyMom Sep 2012 #11
Well according to Rapublicans...........this wasn't rape thelordofhell Sep 2012 #5
It would seem that the 'clean hands' doctrine would Jumping John Sep 2012 #6
The Clean Hands Doctrine, only applies to issues of Equity, not law happyslug Sep 2012 #48
Must not been a legitimate rape if she got pregnant..... LynneSin Sep 2012 #7
Absolutely marions ghost Sep 2012 #27
The sexual predator should not be allowed contact with any child Anarcho-Socialist Sep 2012 #8
This country waterboards people in war get the red out Sep 2012 #9
This so-called man couldn't even control himself by raping a young girl! What makes the court think jonesgirl Sep 2012 #10
She chose to keep the baby 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Sep 2012 #13
I'm surprised he didn't try the old republican "But she looked 18 at the time!" -defense Blue_Tires Sep 2012 #14
how about this defense!!! beachgirl2365 Sep 2012 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #15
creative legal tactics should not be necessary... marions ghost Sep 2012 #30
i disagree. rape, no child custody. that simple. no law? they need to make one. it is an obvious seabeyond Sep 2012 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #34
ok... so until we ALL go out and become legislators NO discussing or stating opinion on what laws seabeyond Sep 2012 #36
The Courts have rejected your position happyslug Sep 2012 #49
why did this guy only get probation? azurnoir Sep 2012 #17
Statutory, and it depends on state laws... Blue_Tires Sep 2012 #18
If it was statutory, why is she suffering from anxiety and depression? starroute Sep 2012 #21
She's a 17 year old single mom. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #24
well it could be that the statutory charge was only a false deal or azurnoir Sep 2012 #25
It's "statuatory" because it was child sexual abuse. McCamy Taylor Sep 2012 #29
First he was not convicted of pedophilia azurnoir Sep 2012 #38
As far as I can tell she wasn't dating this guy. The guy was a boyfriend of LisaL Sep 2012 #47
Apparently the prosecutor cut a deal justiceischeap Sep 2012 #22
light sentences for rape is not unheard of. nt seabeyond Sep 2012 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #35
Probally because the child was born, and the Court knows how little welfare is. happyslug Sep 2012 #50
But why was she in that predicament to begin with? LisaL Sep 2012 #52
The concern for most courts is support for the Child happyslug Oct 2012 #53
this isn't about him wanting visitation...this is about him NOT wanting to pay child support. ret5hd Sep 2012 #19
I'd put money on that. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #26
Or ... its another way to exert POWER over his victim. Power is what rape is about. JoePhilly Sep 2012 #37
Do you understand what statutory rape means? azurnoir Sep 2012 #40
maybe, but right now, with lawyers and stuff, he's thinkin' 'bout money. ret5hd Sep 2012 #41
Exactly LizW Sep 2012 #43
Republican "Family Values". Odin2005 Sep 2012 #20
+1 sarcasmo Sep 2012 #46
Clearly Rep. Akin's area of expertise. onehandle Sep 2012 #23
The man is a pedophile. How can he visit a child? McCamy Taylor Sep 2012 #28
Agree marions ghost Sep 2012 #31
He is a rapist and therefore has abused the mother of the child. JDPriestly Sep 2012 #39
Not in Pennsylvania and most other states UNLESS the abuse raises to the level of "Great harm". happyslug Sep 2012 #51
This guy's human trash Shitty Mitty Sep 2012 #42
Isn't allowing your child to be with a...... DeSwiss Sep 2012 #44
Kick (nt) muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #45
Gimmick to get out of child support? One_Life_To_Give Oct 2012 #54
Have any rapists been granted visitation rights? duhneece Oct 2012 #55
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rapist seeking visitation...»Reply #23