Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Maybe after Somalia suspends it, the U.S. MIGHT consider suspending it, too. nt valerief Sep 2012 #1
Really. gateley Sep 2012 #6
Dream on. dipsydoodle Sep 2012 #12
Thank you, Russia! Cha Sep 2012 #2
Russia has access to whether corn is GMO, or not? But U.S. citizens purchasing it don't? Trillo Sep 2012 #3
Whoa! This is fantastic & very hopeful. 99th_Monkey Sep 2012 #4
k&r avaistheone1 Sep 2012 #5
wow! nt flamingdem Sep 2012 #7
Bravo, Russia. Vidar Sep 2012 #8
the Americas LiberalLovinLug Sep 2012 #9
I know I'm a broken record here Le Taz Hot Sep 2012 #10
K&R DeSwiss Sep 2012 #11
Free clue for Monsanto and other Republican Corps. Berlum Sep 2012 #13
Another reason to avoid HF corn syrup, and any food or beverage that contains it peacebird Sep 2012 #14
beet sugar too now lunasun Sep 2012 #21
How is this any different than the occasional bad study put out by climate denialists? evirus Sep 2012 #15
The luddites alleady "know" that GMOs are teh evil, they are just looking for verification. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #16
Indeed. HuckleB Sep 2012 #53
You don't happen to work for Monsanto, do you? AAO Sep 2012 #17
The lessor of two evils is still evil. evirus Sep 2012 #18
Absolutely! Monsanto is evil. n/t AAO Sep 2012 #19
But to blame an entire industry on the actions of a few bad examples? evirus Sep 2012 #22
I DON'T WANT GMO FOOD - IT RISKS GLOBAL CATASTROPHE! AAO Sep 2012 #28
you are comparing Monsanto to the Democratic party? G_j Sep 2012 #36
I'm comparing GMO to the democratic party evirus Sep 2012 #50
Truth would be preferable arikara Sep 2012 #47
Tom Sanders Astrad Sep 2012 #20
It's only suprising if you believe in guilt by association. evirus Sep 2012 #23
I don't think his association Astrad Sep 2012 #25
Um . . . fruit is high in sugar 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #27
Coke doesn't use sugar, but HFCS. AAO Sep 2012 #31
HFCS is sugar 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #33
It is "a" sugar, but it is definatley not "sugar". n/t AAO Sep 2012 #38
That is scientifically inacurrate 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #41
You got me there. I still think GMO's should be banned. n/t AAO Sep 2012 #44
Agree to disagree then. 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #45
I love to agree to disagree - I wish we could all do that! Thanks... n/t AAO Sep 2012 #48
You are far too kind. HuckleB Sep 2012 #59
I've been told this is my only fault 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #60
LOL! HuckleB Sep 2012 #61
It's not fructose either... nebenaube Sep 2012 #79
So what? HuckleB Sep 2012 #58
Which has more artificial coloring bitchkitty Sep 2012 #32
Wow a 1000 times! 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #34
There are more than calories bitchkitty Sep 2012 #54
The actual quote we're responding to: 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #56
Who drinks a litre of apple juice a day? Maybe Johnny Appleseed, but come'on! n/t AAO Sep 2012 #29
+1,000,000,000,000 HuckleB Sep 2012 #52
Scientist: GM food safety testing is “woefully inadequate” JohnyCanuck Sep 2012 #24
Not so good for Monsanto riverbendviewgal Sep 2012 #26
All substances should be proven safe before they are allowed into the environment not byeya Sep 2012 #30
How do you "prove" something is safe? 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #35
I guess to err on the side of safety G_j Sep 2012 #39
Which means what in this context? 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #42
How about longer than 3 months? n/t AAO Sep 2012 #40
Give me a time period. 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #43
That is for scientists to quibble about. I guess we can agree to disagree once again! n/t AAO Sep 2012 #49
You don't accept what the scientists say now, so why you would accept something different? HuckleB Sep 2012 #62
Monsanto scientists? No I don't trust them. They are paid by Mosanto to produce an outcome. AAO Sep 2012 #72
So, you're saying that all GE Food research is paid for by Monsanto? HuckleB Sep 2012 #73
Well if you thnik it's a red herring, then the discussion is over. Agree to disagree... AAO Sep 2012 #75
You seem to be jumping from one thing to another without addressing the last points. HuckleB Sep 2012 #76
I disagree. n/t AAO Sep 2012 #82
Genetic Roulette FULL Movie G_j Sep 2012 #37
Poor rats! Quantess Sep 2012 #46
Monsanto Whistleblower Says Genetically Engineered Crops May Cause Disease JohnyCanuck Sep 2012 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author JohnyCanuck Sep 2012 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author JohnyCanuck Sep 2012 #66
We have the right to know what we are eating. limpyhobbler Sep 2012 #55
Looks like Russia isn't going with the consensus. HuckleB Sep 2012 #57
Just out of curiousity what's your reaction to the Stanford organics study? JackRiddler Sep 2012 #63
The one where they said that there is no difference between organic and genetically modified food? darkangel218 Sep 2012 #64
Peer review and scientific consensus makes it appear to be quite sound. HuckleB Sep 2012 #70
Scientists Under Attack (when their research shows health related problems with eating GMOs) JohnyCanuck Sep 2012 #67
enlightening G_j Sep 2012 #71
Quite an article. GM promoters aren't just anti-science, they're anti-people. Prometheus Bound Sep 2012 #80
His research was debunked. HuckleB Sep 2012 #81
Soon US crops won't be bought and disaster in the making lovuian Sep 2012 #68
The irony is absurd. LanternWaste Sep 2012 #69
"Lamarckism" is not all dead and all wrong tama Sep 2012 #74
The Guardian: The GM debate is growing up HuckleB Sep 2012 #77
K&R n/t Smickey Sep 2012 #78
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia Suspends Use of Ge...»Reply #11