Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Secretary Clinton does not need $, but I would still donate to her legal fund, if she had one catrose Jan 2020 #1
me too!! samnsara Jan 2020 #4
here's a donation. limbaugh praised gabbard with a caller, a gabbard fan claiming to be a certainot Jan 2020 #47
I'm pretty sure, I saw where she meant the GOP was grooming her. dewsgirl Jan 2020 #2
oh boo hoo someones feefees got hurted.. samnsara Jan 2020 #3
So you're OK with slander if your idol does it? n/t Odoreida Jan 2020 #49
Tulsi is a public figure jberryhill Jan 2020 #52
Not a "public figure" in the context of libel/slander law, but a "public official". lastlib Jan 2020 #70
Hillary never mentioned Gabbard by name. And Gabbard is a public figure running for President. Squinch Jan 2020 #60
Sounds like Tulski is MontanaMama Jan 2020 #5
Seriously? This Again? Me. Jan 2020 #6
Wonder who is behind this. 50 Shades Of Blue Jan 2020 #7
I am wondering the same thing. hamsterjill Jan 2020 #15
the desperate flailings of someone flaming out. nt Javaman Jan 2020 #8
Vlad sues Hillary. sarcasmo Jan 2020 #9
Exactly seta1950 Jan 2020 #10
Woo! Talk about some major butthurt! 2naSalit Jan 2020 #11
Is it really defamation Dopers_Greed Jan 2020 #12
Also, truth is a valid defense in defamation cases lagomorph777 Jan 2020 #13
Especially when she said it was the REPUBLICANS who were grooming someone rsdsharp Jan 2020 #16
Public figure / political speech.... jberryhill Jan 2020 #54
Good luck with that, Tulsi... paleotn Jan 2020 #14
I agree Rebl2 Jan 2020 #23
+1 K&R onetexan Jan 2020 #71
50 million? That's some serious grifting. nt chowder66 Jan 2020 #17
I don't believe Hillary mentioned Tulsi by name ... aggiesal Jan 2020 #18
Even Tulsi knows the case is bullshit Blue_Tires Jan 2020 #26
Ding! Ding! Ding! Winnah!!! Raster Jan 2020 #34
Hillary used "her" to describe...which could mean at140 Jan 2020 #58
Oh, boy!! Can I help with the discovery request by the Clinton legal team? TygrBright Jan 2020 #19
Why on earth is she... Wuddles440 Jan 2020 #20
Maybe this is a "WWTD" kinda thang solara Jan 2020 #21
That makes sense. They are pretty much cut christx30 Jan 2020 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author BannonsLiver Jan 2020 #22
Maybe she could get a few notes from Devin Nunez. BlueIdaho Jan 2020 #24
Wonder which right winger is financing this bullshit. While Clinton didn't expliciting mention still_one Jan 2020 #25
Fortunately, the good folks in Hawaii's 2nd CD. . . DinahMoeHum Jan 2020 #27
Tulsi Gabbard... MarianJack Jan 2020 #28
Maybe Gabbard needs to sue NBC which reported on Russia's interest in her delisen Jan 2020 #29
trying to stay relevant... stillcool Jan 2020 #30
Gabbard is a tool Rorey Jan 2020 #31
She's following the Devin Nunes playbook calguy Jan 2020 #32
from the Hoarse Whisperer Gothmog Jan 2020 #33
That's a good one! mr_lebowski Jan 2020 #36
So... her argument is tht Sec. Clinton prevented her from cashing in? Stryst Jan 2020 #35
Seems her lawyers have no idea what the term 'actual damages' actually means ... mr_lebowski Jan 2020 #37
How much is $50 M in rubles? underpants Jan 2020 #38
My guess is that some Conservative organization or person is backing this. Recall Paula Jones? Midnight Writer Jan 2020 #39
Maybe all the folks pushing the "Dems were unified until she raised her hand" BS Grokenstein Jan 2020 #40
I'm ok with Rep. Gabbard taking steps to defend herself and respond to defamation Devil Child Jan 2020 #41
Hillary didn't use her name. And Tulsi is a public figure -- the bar is set very high for pnwmom Jan 2020 #44
Bingo - been trying to explain that to people. . . ET Awful Jan 2020 #48
The "didn't use her name" part is not relevant jberryhill Jan 2020 #55
There is also the fact that newspaper issued a correction on the initial report. pnwmom Jan 2020 #59
The Complaint is a joke jberryhill Jan 2020 #61
Yeah, that complaint was just a big P.R. job. I wonder who's paying for it. nt pnwmom Jan 2020 #63
I know. It was weird enough when the hack Nunes hired did it onenote Jan 2020 #68
Her spokesperson said if the nesting doll fits JonLP24 Jan 2020 #83
Big deal. Tulsi Gabbard is a public figure and the bar is set very high. nt pnwmom Jan 2020 #84
I said so myself JonLP24 Jan 2020 #85
My quick research indicated that NY has a narrow and weak anti-SLAPP law. onenote Jan 2020 #76
The fact that she is a public figure is why she has a hard case JonLP24 Jan 2020 #82
Of course you are. Nice avatar you have there, too. Hekate Jan 2020 #45
Thanks!! Devil Child Jan 2020 #46
Forgot my sarcasm smiley Hekate Jan 2020 #56
It's all good, I forgive you! Devil Child Jan 2020 #64
How was she defamed? BuddhaGirl Jan 2020 #50
Seriously...don't think this will go anywhere. Tulsi need to grow the f up. nt iluvtennis Jan 2020 #42
Interesting. KnR Hekate Jan 2020 #43
There is/was a campaign? guillaumeb Jan 2020 #51
Apparently one member in this thread Wawannabe Jan 2020 #79
I saw that. guillaumeb Jan 2020 #81
That should be dismissed immediately treestar Jan 2020 #53
What lawyer would take this nonsense accusation? mahina Jan 2020 #57
One who has received an adequate retainer jberryhill Jan 2020 #62
And who sees a chance to get some publicity treestar Jan 2020 #65
Obvious desperation. Hillary didn't even say that. Eugene Jan 2020 #66
Please go away, Tulsi. orangecrush Jan 2020 #67
Seriously Tulsi just admit you're a republican mdbl Jan 2020 #72
representing enid602 Jan 2020 #73
Yawn. truthisfreedom Jan 2020 #74
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Jan 2020 #75
Neither of them will be president. Gore1FL Jan 2020 #77
Moo! Wawannabe Jan 2020 #78
Gabbard merely proves her incompetence and stupidity Yeehah Jan 2020 #80
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rep. Tulsi Gabbard sues H...»Reply #79