Latest Breaking News

doc03

(35,293 posts)

41. The talking heads I heard said the SCOTUS

Reply to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #34)

Mon Nov 18, 2019, 06:58 PM

Nov 2019

would not even take on the case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court temporarily halts court order requiring accountants to turn over Trump's tax returns t [View all] Polybius Nov 2019 OP

As expected, CJ Roberts issues temporary stay in Trump v. Mazars, meaning accounting firm doesn't... mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2019 #1

This isn't unexpected. djg21 Nov 2019 #9

Thanks. NT mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2019 #11

It means the SC will review the case, right? California_Republic Nov 2019 #12

No. djg21 Nov 2019 #14

They have a Twitter account too, as does Amy Howe, one of their prolific writers. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2019 #22

No, it means that they are getting ready to consider whether to review it. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #16

Oh boy DENVERPOPS Nov 2019 #30

Thanks for the heads up! Dennis Donovan Nov 2019 #15

I knew it his f----g court is his insurance policy. nt doc03 Nov 2019 #2

+1 ancianita Nov 2019 #17

Both sides indicated they were fine with exactly this order. It says nothing about onenote Nov 2019 #21

Justices Gorsuck and Boof are doing their jobs. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #33

Yes, along with all the other Justices. This is a routine administrative order The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #34

The talking heads I heard said the SCOTUS doc03 Nov 2019 #41

They shouldn't (but then, I didn't think they should or would hear Bush v. Gore, either). The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #42

Before the predictable hissy-fit about the evil Supreme Court is posted The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #3

Thx for weighing in!! Thekaspervote Nov 2019 #6

+1 Mike 03 Nov 2019 #8

Thanks. I was just about to say something similar (sans the tweet). ET Awful Nov 2019 #18

Too late. Some already are saying this shows the court is intent on saving Trump onenote Nov 2019 #23

Lots of knee-jerking is performed by folks who don't know how the process works, The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #28

And Justice Roberts has been sooooooo concerned about the politicization of the court... Raster Nov 2019 #4

See above. It's an administrative stay giving the lawyers time to file briefs. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #7

I see this and changed my post. Raster Nov 2019 #25

Better yet, that they don't take the case at all. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #26

Yes, that would be optimum, allowing the lower courts judgement to stand. Raster Nov 2019 #27

Did I just hear Pete Williams cilla4progress Nov 2019 #5

I haven't read it yet, but I believe the committee agreed to a 10 day stay beginning the 20th herding cats Nov 2019 #10

The Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was scheduled to take affect this Wednesday ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #20

Trump's lawyers already have filed onenote Nov 2019 #24

I agree, that's why I wrote ... aggiesal Nov 2019 #36

Congressional oversight is on the chopping block. Mz Pip Nov 2019 #13

Don't jump to conclusions. The court hasn't even agreed to hear the case yet. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #19

It IS on the chopping block ArizonaLib Nov 2019 #39

Not jumping to conclusions. Mz Pip Nov 2019 #40

I think they may refuse to hear it just to preserve the SC as seemingly impartial. truthisfreedom Nov 2019 #29

I hope so. dewsgirl Nov 2019 #31

"consider arguments" Maxheader Nov 2019 #32

This stay was supported by the House committee onenote Nov 2019 #35

I wonder if the court will interfere with the House which would be a violation of the Constitution. cstanleytech Nov 2019 #37

So do you agree with Judge Rao onenote Nov 2019 #43

Nope I don't agree as the court is supposed to be one of the checks and cstanleytech Nov 2019 #44

This is not a big deal Gothmog Nov 2019 #38