Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dware

(12,336 posts)
16. The US is not a signatory to the ICC, therefore an indictment would be worthless and
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 09:35 PM
Nov 2019

unenforceable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_International_Criminal_Court

United States and the International Criminal Court
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The United States is not a State Party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute),[1] which founded the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002 as a permanent international criminal court to "bring to justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind – war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide", when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so.[2]
As of January 2019, 123 states are members of the Court.[3] Other states that have not become parties to the Rome Statute include India, Indonesia, and China.[3] On May 6th, 2002, the United States, in a position shared with Israel and Sudan, having previously signed the Rome Statute formally withdrew its signature and indicated that it did not intend to ratify the agreement.[3]
United States policy concerning the ICC has varied widely. The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not submit it for Senate ratification. The George W. Bush Administration, the U.S. administration at the time of the ICC's founding, stated that it would not join the ICC. The Obama Administration subsequently re-established a working relationship with the Court as an observer
Dictators, War Crimes, Putting Babies in Cages... madaboutharry Nov 2019 #1
why the hell DENVERPOPS Nov 2019 #9
He is practicing. dewsgirl Nov 2019 #2
Yep, this is the warmup. JudyM Nov 2019 #4
Evidently for Trump, war crimes are just fine and dandy. No surprise. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #3
Right now, it is Trump condoning/pardoning war crimes, but in the long run, it will be America appro keithbvadu2 Nov 2019 #5
he's kissing up... stillcool Nov 2019 #6
I wonder how many pardons rump will grant when he is forced to leave office...can you ... SWBTATTReg Nov 2019 #7
OK...thought experiment... sdfernando Nov 2019 #8
Interesting post Red Mountain Nov 2019 #10
All good questions sdfernando Nov 2019 #22
The US is not a signatory to the ICC, therefore an indictment would be worthless and dware Nov 2019 #16
Yes I would guess that is true sdfernando Nov 2019 #23
Yes burrowowl Nov 2019 #24
It's also why Cheney NEVER leaves the country. Haggis for Breakfast Nov 2019 #35
Yes they could, but the chances of that happening are minimal. dware Nov 2019 #29
During bush/cheney, of course. calimary Nov 2019 #26
Pres. Clinton signed it but didn't submit it to the Congress, dware Nov 2019 #31
Faux News told him to do this... RainCaster Nov 2019 #11
trump feels better when he frees fellow guilty rats. mpcamb Nov 2019 #12
Our thug (p)Resident Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2019 #13
Just another reason to hate the bastard bluestarone Nov 2019 #14
It's his big "fuck you" to America. He knows that non-MAGAts will be angered and appalled, scarletwoman Nov 2019 #15
Distraction and red-meat to base. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2019 #17
I believe this is a stupid move that will appeal too a very limited number of voters. And lose a Nitram Nov 2019 #18
I think so also. dware Nov 2019 #19
I seriously doubt he'd lose military votes over this. Calista241 Nov 2019 #20
I may be wrong, but I believe anyone who supports that view is a hard core Tump supporter Nitram Nov 2019 #21
I have a pretty good idea, dware Nov 2019 #32
Pardoning Murderers Now... B Stieg Nov 2019 #25
This is a warm up for Roger Stone and Rudy, if Barr allows Rudy's case to go on. gab13by13 Nov 2019 #27
As a veteran BigOleDummy Nov 2019 #28
Only one was convicted of murder, dware Nov 2019 #33
Trump Betrays the Military demmiblue Nov 2019 #30
Bravo Zulu, demmiblue. Haggis for Breakfast Nov 2019 #36
Yeah, who needs military discipline? Yeehah Nov 2019 #34
"'completely dishonors' tens of thousands of American service members" pat_k Nov 2019 #37
Sorry but BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #38
Any administration that makes pat_k Nov 2019 #39
You have conflated his "we" BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #40
Effectively... pat_k Nov 2019 #41
He made a public directive to basically ban the bullshit term "enhanced interrogation" BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #42
Which is why failure to prosecute was so egregious. pat_k Nov 2019 #43
Have you not seen how difficult it is to prosecute just simple stuff right now BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #44
Give me a break... pat_k Nov 2019 #45
I have "read up" and watched panel discussions and hearings at the time. BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump issues pardons in w...»Reply #16