Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump issues pardons in war-crimes cases, despite Pentagon opposition to the move [View all]dware
(12,336 posts)16. The US is not a signatory to the ICC, therefore an indictment would be worthless and
unenforceable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_International_Criminal_Court
United States and the International Criminal Court
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The United States is not a State Party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute),[1] which founded the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002 as a permanent international criminal court to "bring to justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide", when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so.[2]
As of January 2019, 123 states are members of the Court.[3] Other states that have not become parties to the Rome Statute include India, Indonesia, and China.[3] On May 6th, 2002, the United States, in a position shared with Israel and Sudan, having previously signed the Rome Statute formally withdrew its signature and indicated that it did not intend to ratify the agreement.[3]
United States policy concerning the ICC has varied widely. The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not submit it for Senate ratification. The George W. Bush Administration, the U.S. administration at the time of the ICC's founding, stated that it would not join the ICC. The Obama Administration subsequently re-established a working relationship with the Court as an observer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The United States is not a State Party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute),[1] which founded the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002 as a permanent international criminal court to "bring to justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide", when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so.[2]
As of January 2019, 123 states are members of the Court.[3] Other states that have not become parties to the Rome Statute include India, Indonesia, and China.[3] On May 6th, 2002, the United States, in a position shared with Israel and Sudan, having previously signed the Rome Statute formally withdrew its signature and indicated that it did not intend to ratify the agreement.[3]
United States policy concerning the ICC has varied widely. The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not submit it for Senate ratification. The George W. Bush Administration, the U.S. administration at the time of the ICC's founding, stated that it would not join the ICC. The Obama Administration subsequently re-established a working relationship with the Court as an observer
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump issues pardons in war-crimes cases, despite Pentagon opposition to the move [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
OP
Evidently for Trump, war crimes are just fine and dandy. No surprise.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Nov 2019
#3
Right now, it is Trump condoning/pardoning war crimes, but in the long run, it will be America appro
keithbvadu2
Nov 2019
#5
I wonder how many pardons rump will grant when he is forced to leave office...can you ...
SWBTATTReg
Nov 2019
#7
The US is not a signatory to the ICC, therefore an indictment would be worthless and
dware
Nov 2019
#16
It's his big "fuck you" to America. He knows that non-MAGAts will be angered and appalled,
scarletwoman
Nov 2019
#15
I believe this is a stupid move that will appeal too a very limited number of voters. And lose a
Nitram
Nov 2019
#18
I may be wrong, but I believe anyone who supports that view is a hard core Tump supporter
Nitram
Nov 2019
#21
This is a warm up for Roger Stone and Rudy, if Barr allows Rudy's case to go on.
gab13by13
Nov 2019
#27
He made a public directive to basically ban the bullshit term "enhanced interrogation"
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#42
Have you not seen how difficult it is to prosecute just simple stuff right now
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#44