Latest Breaking News

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)

1. "The judge in Monday's decision, Carl Nichols, is a Trump appointee"

Reply to Gothmog (Original post)

Mon Nov 11, 2019, 02:57 PM

Nov 2019

Whoah. Amazing!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump can't sue New York State in DC federal court to stop release of tax returns, judge says [View all] Gothmog Nov 2019 OP

"The judge in Monday's decision, Carl Nichols, is a Trump appointee" lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #1

ha-ha-ha-ha-ha Marthe48 Nov 2019 #24

A Trump appointee - that should really piss Trump off. Jim__ Nov 2019 #2

He says that about Obama appointees, so i imagine he WILL say that. nt oldsoftie Nov 2019 #10

No doubt he's fuming, that "HIS" judge didn't show loyalty. bitterross Nov 2019 #33

Not just any judge, a Trump appointed judge. I was dewsgirl Nov 2019 #3

It doesn't make any difference who the judge was or who appointed him The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #7

It matters to Trump.. mountain grammy Nov 2019 #29

That's probably true. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #31

Mr. Trump has not met his burden of establishing personal jurisdiction Gothmog Nov 2019 #4

... which is Civil Procedure 101. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #5

Yep Gothmog Nov 2019 #14

Not that I know anything about law, I don't, defacto7 Nov 2019 #17

Looks like a delaying tactic. N/T Foolacious Nov 2019 #20

I don't think it was meant as a delaying tactic so much as that they'd hoped The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #22

Who says it was a mistake? LiberalFighter Nov 2019 #23

They're probably not getting paid as it is, so I doubt they want to do any more work The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #25

He filed in DC because he wanted the case to be assigned to the same judge onenote Nov 2019 #36

This message was self-deleted by its author lark Nov 2019 #6

No, that's not it at all. The judge dismissed the case without prejudice, The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #8

Isn't taking it to the federal courts at all misplaced? cstanleytech Nov 2019 #18

The federal court in DC had federal subject matter jurisdiction because The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #27

So is it likely to actually see the inside of a federal court or should it stay in the state courts? cstanleytech Nov 2019 #28

I'm guessing it will go to a state court, but The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #30

It would seem, at some point, that SOME followers would wonder why he's fighting SO hard. oldsoftie Nov 2019 #9

Or from whom mgardener Nov 2019 #11

All of the above, and then some. dmr Nov 2019 #12

Or If His Fortune Is Fraudulent ProfessorGAC Nov 2019 #41

Considering most of them have to be spoon-fed the answers to stuff I kind of doubt they're going to cstanleytech Nov 2019 #19

Hey traitor get on your B757-200 and fly to Russia because we the public are going to find out how turbinetree Nov 2019 #13

The range of a 757-200 is just a bit shy of the distance between DC and Moscow. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #15

Don't tell Trump that. LiberalFighter Nov 2019 #35

Finally his money and lawsuits are being challenged. pwb Nov 2019 #16

Imagine Prof Kingsfield dressing down Trump's lawyer BuffaloJackalope Nov 2019 #21

So now does he take it doc03 Nov 2019 #26

Sounds like an interesting law school exam question regarding jurisdiction and venue. Pepsidog Nov 2019 #32

Hand picked Federal Judge rules against fat-ass in the WH on his tax returns and NY State. Gothmog Nov 2019 #34

Trump appointed the judge to the court, but he was assigned to this case randomly. onenote Nov 2019 #37

So a Federal Court ruled that they have no standing.. Botany Nov 2019 #38

I really like the new NY AG Gothmog Nov 2019 #39

trump wants House to notify trump if Democrats ask for trump's tax returns Gothmog Nov 2019 #40