Latest Breaking News

0rganism

(23,944 posts)

4. he put *someone* in grave danger

Wed Nov 6, 2019, 05:04 PM

Nov 2019

might be the whistleblower, might not. now that person and everyone with a similar name and all their immediate families are at risk.
this enemies-list-style criminal bullshit needs to be stomped out pronto. unfortunately, no one can and/or will do it.
certainly not AG Barr.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Impeachment: Trump's son tweets name of alleged whistleblower [View all] MartyTheGreek Nov 2019 OP

FU*K Jr.,.. Junior just put the "whistleblower" in grave danger. Junior should be arrested. Stuart G Nov 2019 #1

he put *someone* in grave danger 0rganism Nov 2019 #4

worse yet DENVERPOPS Nov 2019 #12

an entire nation held hostage to an insatiable ego 0rganism Nov 2019 #13

And worse yet DENVERPOPS Nov 2019 #15

this impacts more than whistleblowers 0rganism Nov 2019 #17

STumpys kids would be like fish out of the water.. Maxheader Nov 2019 #11

Totally agree and the issue about taking the rusky dirt meeting. It led to this! MartyTheGreek Nov 2019 #25

So did he simply parrot it or did he confirm it? If he simply parroted it then its nothing but if he cstanleytech Nov 2019 #2

It would definitely be a crime by whoever gave Turd Jr the name. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #8

Unfortunately, according to the experts in this area, divulging the whistleblower's identity isn't onenote Nov 2019 #18

Maybe it's not a crime just to disclose the name, but what if disclosing the name The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #26

You would have to prove "intent".... AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #29

Of course; but it seems pretty obvious. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #30

I don't recall.."but it seems pretty obvious" as a standard for AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #32

Oh, hell, I know that. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #41

I know what the 4th means/says..as well as the 5th. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #42

No. I'd go into court with evidence supporting every element of the offense. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #43

You're on the wrong track jberryhill Nov 2019 #45

Yes. I looked up the statute earlier. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #46

Hence the use of the term "convention" in the OP. n/t Igel Nov 2019 #31

No it wouldn't be AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #28

"[The Whistleblower Protection Act] provides no protection. It's the worst-named statute..." lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #48

if a democrat did something like this , ohm my goodness. jaumpain jehosapahat AllaN01Bear Nov 2019 #3

Every year a lot of classified and confidential things get leaked. Igel Nov 2019 #33

If anything happens to the person he named, whether they are the whistleblower or not, Arkansas Granny Nov 2019 #5

Any Federal employee doing this would be committing a crime. lagomorph777 Nov 2019 #6

See post 18 onenote Nov 2019 #19

You could argue that the disclosure itself is a form of retaliation. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #27

The statute, unfortunately, has no teeth. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2019 #44

LOCK HIM UP!!! 40 YEARS HARD LABOR IN JAIL FOR JR. trueblue2007 Nov 2019 #7

For???? It's not a crime AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #35

I guess Junior is just as stupid as his father... Stuart G Nov 2019 #9

This message was self-deleted by its author AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #34

It's all just smoke and mirrors. It makes no difference at all who the whistleblower is. Nitram Nov 2019 #10

Not to thinking folks; but having a Dem scapegoat provides continuation of the witch hunt narrative. JudyM Nov 2019 #20

The minions really don't care what he does. Nitram Nov 2019 #21

Yep, they just need some colorable justification, however strained. Saw one of his minions asked JudyM Nov 2019 #38

Must be something in the water that produces these Trump Mutants.They have no values, no principles, Nitram Nov 2019 #39

. JudyM Nov 2019 #40

Yea because Trust fund brats are all above the law. pwb Nov 2019 #14

The name's been out on the internet Raine Nov 2019 #16

It has.... AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #36

Junior could've broke federal law by doing this sakabatou Nov 2019 #22

No...actually not. AncientGeezer Nov 2019 #37

The storm is already here. Who cares who forecasted it? elias7 Nov 2019 #23

Really need a snowstorm here . . . Aussie105 Nov 2019 #24

Its his brother olddad65 Nov 2019 #47