Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump Taxes: Appeals Court Rules President Must Turn Over 8 Years of Tax Returns [View all]crazytown
(7,277 posts)30. And
"There is no obvious reason why a state could not begin to investigate a President during his term and, with the information secured during that search, ultimately determine to prosecute him after he leaves office"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump Taxes: Appeals Court Rules President Must Turn Over 8 Years of Tax Returns [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2019
OP
So it is thought this accounting firm has ALL documents, his real tax returns for X years
Eliot Rosewater
Nov 2019
#4
It was reported that they had already begun the process of gathering the information and said they
vsrazdem
Nov 2019
#11
Yup, he's got zero chance that RGB would allow this dirt on the SCOTUS floor.
berni_mccoy
Nov 2019
#13
By Trump lawyers, you refer to the republican appointed SCOTUS members, right?
ArizonaLib
Nov 2019
#43
The 2nd Circuit made clear it was not deciding if a sitting president might be immune against....
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2019
#22
Here's the nut of the 2d Cir. decision allowing a NY grand jury to subpoena non-private....
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2019
#25
Just as predicted. Trump's position in this case was doubly defective: improper invocation of....
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2019
#28
Several times I've mentioned US v Nixon (Watergate tapes subpoena) & this decision cites it.
CaptainTruth
Nov 2019
#34