Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Condom used as evidence in Assange sex case 'does not contain his DNA' [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)This is the 100 page document the article is referring to, I believe:
http://www.nnn.se/nordic/assange/docs/memoria.pdf
The condom part starts on page 79/100, on page 85 is a short note taken on 20 October by the officer in charge of the investigation which explains which condoms were produced and what they found.
"MÄ2" (Sofia Wilén) is the one who was drowsy, "half asleep", and allegedly didn't notice that a condom was missing while she had sex with Assange. (Why she even brought a condom to the police is a mystery to me, but THIS is the one where no DNA was found.)
"MÄ1" (Anna Ardin*) is the one who claims the condom was deliberately ripped apart. Although she didn't know when she was interviewed if the condom was still to be found somewhere in her flat, and hadn't examined yet if it was actually broken (8 days after the fact), she delivered a torn** condom to the police station on 25 August 2010. This is the condom with DNA, from Ardin and from a man, the same DNA from a man was found in vaginal swops (vaginaltops) taken from Ardin (don't know at what point).
* It seems apparent from the final remark in this note that "MÄ1" is Ardin, it is a short summary of Ardin's allegation (it was dark and she couldn't see the condom but heard a sound like from a balloon, found condom under the bed).
** on page 81 the forensic report says the condom looks like it has been damaged by a knife or scissors