Which # 2 (Reply #14) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: Al-Qaeda says ‘meticulously executed’ Benghazi attack ‘revenge’ for number two’s death [View all]

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 12:23 AM

fun n serious (4,451 posts)

14. Which # 2

of all the #2?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

30 replies	Author	Time	Post
Al-Qaeda says ‘meticulously executed’ Benghazi attack ‘revenge’ for number two’s death [View all]	DonViejo	Sep 2012	OP
Yeah, they gunned down harmless diplomats. Really brave. nt/	Akoto	Sep 2012	#1
Same could be said of US drone attacks which kill innocent civilians.	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#12
Most do.	joshcryer	Sep 2012	#16
Nothing excuses murdering diplomats. Two wrongs do not = right. n/t	Akoto	Sep 2012	#18
"Not all of Libya supports their government." Of course not, but if the attackers were foreigners	pampango	Sep 2012	#19
These are the jihadists we called 'revolutionaries' when NATO claimed to be	sabrina 1	Sep 2012	#2
Sabrina 1, I tend to agree with your take on the situation. The same might be said about	lumpy	Sep 2012	#26
If true, points to AQ reconstitution inside post-regime change Libya - bad omen for US ops in Syria.	leveymg	Sep 2012	#3
The "jihadist groups" were and remain a small minority in Libya.	joshcryer	Sep 2012	#15
The jihadist groups disproportionately made up the fighters who took down Ghadaffi, which is why	leveymg	Sep 2012	#23
Do you have a citation for that?	joshcryer	Sep 2012	#25
Chris Stevens set up camp in Benghazi not in Misrata or the Berber areas.	leveymg	Sep 2012	#27
Sure. But you contended that they "disproportionately made up the fighters...	joshcryer	Sep 2012	#30
"Regime change comes with costs." The fall of dictators, tsars and kings does come with costs.	pampango	Sep 2012	#21
I wouldn't view Libya so much a revolution as a change in US/NATO installed gov't.	leveymg	Sep 2012	#24
i wonder what those who say it was because of the stupid movie will say about this.	uppityperson	Sep 2012	#4
That stupid movie was shown to a grand audience of 10 people. IT was and is only a pathetic	Vincardog	Sep 2012	#5
It was the narrative of its contents	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#6
Funny that. I heard that the violence was in response to the killing of the #2 AQ. The "movie"	Vincardog	Sep 2012	#7
The protest was a diversion from the real attack. That was planned and coordinated in	leveymg	Sep 2012	#9
If the Salaafist clerics on an Egyptian broadcast had not done the broadcast	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#11
Forced choice.	Igel	Sep 2012	#13
"Claiming responsibility" is the sort of bluster all terriorist / insurgent groups engage in...	reACTIONary	Sep 2012	#8
Is Al-Qaeda actually responsible or just taking credit?	Tucsonric	Sep 2012	#10
Which # 2	fun n serious	Sep 2012	#14
There'll be a new #2 next week.	Frank Cannon	Sep 2012	#22
Now people can shut the fuck up about dismantling the First Amendment. nt	Comrade_McKenzie	Sep 2012	#17
It was pretty obvious..	sendero	Sep 2012	#20
I was listening to Amb. Rice this morning	glacierbay	Sep 2012	#28
I sure hope they have their facts right or walk this back really fast.	dkf	Sep 2012	#29

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.