Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Former White House counsel Don McGahn did not attend his House hearing. The hearing happened anyway. [View all]prodigitalson
(2,404 posts)39. It makes him look way more dangerous than the
word 'petulent.' This is about raw political power and how it relates to the balance of such between our branches of government.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Former White House counsel Don McGahn did not attend his House hearing. The hearing happened anyway. [View all]
pnwmom
May 2019
OP
At the moment, apparently, 'contempt' means nothing more than no dessert before bedtime tonight
groundloop
May 2019
#2
From what they have done, Dems have no desire to enforce the law, but are very good at whining to
keopeli
May 2019
#7
No, they are following the steps a judge will expect to see when they ask the judge
pnwmom
May 2019
#36
It does not make the Dems look weak. It does however, make Trump look petulant.
LanternWaste
May 2019
#38
...what comes after contempt citation, Nader? Another strongly worded letter?
beachbum bob
May 2019
#20
Interesting who chooses to turn this important development into yet another BS attack on Democrats.
FreepFryer
May 2019
#23
For those complaining the the Democrats are not doing enough - read this thread
csziggy
May 2019
#37