Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
30. After reading the article, these items are used on military aircraft
Wed May 15, 2019, 01:37 PM
May 2019

Even a little pin can be a critical item in the aircraft design. Without seeing the actual IG finding, it's hard for me to say what exactly is the situation here, but it does look like this is some sort of omnibus contract, perhaps a BOA (basic ordering agreement) or DVD (direct vendor delivery) with the prime vendor. CICA (competition in contracting act) is the law of the land so DLA would have had to advertize for proposals before awarding the contract. If DLA did a sole source award, they would have had to justify it in writing.

Also, DLA was never set up to manage parts unique to military aircraft. They were built for bulk purchasing of hardware - nuts, bolts, etc. But years ago, the individual services were ordered to transfer many parts that had complex management issues to them. It created a lot of problems and appears if that might still be the case.

We desperately need to audit the Pentagon. They are a money pit. walkingman May 2019 #1
They want more money? mahannah May 2019 #2
Pricing policy: BootinUp May 2019 #3
They want to "contribute" to a border wall? mahannah May 2019 #4
In the '80s it was $600 toilet seats and $300 hammers sandensea May 2019 #5
The armed forces move personnel every two years. cate94 May 2019 #6
Career civilians, not military, handle 99% of DoD spare parts contracting DeminPennswoods May 2019 #14
Wonder whatever happened to that procurement whistleblower, Bunnatine Greenhouse, who made headlines JudyM May 2019 #7
She won OnlinePoker May 2019 #10
Yeah! That's great. Now if only we could just address getting those "better laws" on the books. JudyM May 2019 #23
This will likely die on someone's desk quietly in the middle of the night... EarthFirst May 2019 #8
They want to cut medicaid, medicare, the ACA, social security, education..on and on. YOHABLO May 2019 #9
And the GOP... SergeStorms May 2019 #12
we need to starve this beast- mopinko May 2019 #11
We tried to levitate the damned place... SergeStorms May 2019 #13
i am just old enough to remember that. mopinko May 2019 #19
I often retell this tale to the youngsters TomVilmer May 2019 #24
The problem with stories like this one DeminPennswoods May 2019 #15
I can't speak for anyone else MissMillie May 2019 #17
I was a mechanic in the army Woodwizard May 2019 #18
Ask yourself if every case of different and unique specs is required bitterross May 2019 #26
After reading the article, these items are used on military aircraft DeminPennswoods May 2019 #30
You have to take into account the overheads, too. Ghost Dog May 2019 #29
What then are the rational reasons this specific unit almost 10,000% over cost? LanternWaste May 2019 #31
The agency that manages these parts DeminPennswoods May 2019 #33
"review found potential excess profits for 98 of 100 parts sampled". Audit, ya think? Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #16
My father was quoting dock boards for a naval weapons facility--the highest-priced supplier won! TheBlackAdder May 2019 #20
I'll bet that at that rate of overcharging DFW May 2019 #21
How does this happen under FAR & TINA? tammywammy May 2019 #22
Because sometimes auditors have an agenda DeminPennswoods May 2019 #25
When I saw the heading saying "9,400% in excess profit for a half-inch metal pin", area51 May 2019 #27
For certain things melm00se May 2019 #28
Capitalism is rife with ... GeorgeGist May 2019 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pentagon contractor's 9,4...»Reply #30