Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rogue emissary

(3,148 posts)
57. It pissed me off how GOP would down play the falling number.
Fri May 3, 2019, 04:43 PM
May 2019

I just didn't think they'd be so hypocritical to now boast about the same numbers.

About 76 of those months were during & due to Obama's terms & economic recovery. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #1
Exactly. BumRushDaShow May 2019 #2
at this point, no data is beleivable that comes out of the trump admin, if the job market is SO beachbum bob May 2019 #3
The very definition of "jobs" has changed. Yavin4 May 2019 #4
Not really FBaggins May 2019 #28
"If all you look at is the headline U3 figure, that could be true." But that's what gets reported Yavin4 May 2019 #34
"Employment, as defined by the BLS, does not have the same meaning as it once did." progree May 2019 #37
No... that's just the headline FBaggins May 2019 #41
On second thought progree May 2019 #47
And that stat, the U6 figure at the link, is at 7.3% which does not get reported in the media. Yavin4 May 2019 #50
Where? In the Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #5
since only the top .1% are reaping rewards, seem like 2020 should be a cakewalk IF beachbum bob May 2019 #7
Doncha know they vote for tRump cause gubmnt the only thing keeping em from being millionaires. . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2019 #8
30% of america level of hate will never change beachbum bob May 2019 #9
From the report: mahatmakanejeeves May 2019 #12
That number can be skewed idahoblue May 2019 #17
That's why I look at production and non-supervisory employees number progree May 2019 #19
Your CEO & the like arent considered "average hourly employees" oldsoftie May 2019 #24
$15 an hour wages abound here in CO. gldstwmn May 2019 #25
Paltry. Yavin4 May 2019 #35
"where are the pay raises?" BumRushDaShow May 2019 #6
Pay up 2% - inflation up 3% LogicFirst May 2019 #15
Sorry, that's not what they are reporting. progree May 2019 #18
Yes, I agree! I think they are cookin' the books! Can't believe ANYTHING that comes out of Trump's.. machoneman May 2019 #20
One million+ legal immigrants every year are willing at140 May 2019 #51
103 straight months. Phenomenal FBaggins May 2019 #10
Seems like forever. LogicFirst May 2019 #16
Good morning. The WaPo did that with their headline about the GDP last Friday too. mahatmakanejeeves May 2019 #11
TGIF and glad you made it in this morning! BumRushDaShow May 2019 #14
Links to earlier reports mahatmakanejeeves May 2019 #13
Just watch! These great numbers will be reduced next month, proving they are cookin'.... machoneman May 2019 #21
Love how these figures are legit and a perfect representation of the labor market. rogue emissary May 2019 #22
Haha moose65 May 2019 #42
It pissed me off how GOP would down play the falling number. rogue emissary May 2019 #57
Shouldn't be a surprise moose65 May 2019 #65
The numbers are what they are. We use the same stats for every president. Thats the way it is. oldsoftie May 2019 #23
Umm... OldBaldy1701E May 2019 #26
From the report: mahatmakanejeeves May 2019 #29
10,000 lies--But the Economic Numbers are True roman1219 May 2019 #27
19 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God's wrath, for it is written: "It ... marble falls May 2019 #55
Lots of aberrant stastistics of the month: Employed: -103,000; Labor force: -490,000 progree May 2019 #30
Thank you for that deeper dive of the data info!!! BumRushDaShow May 2019 #31
You're welcome. Glad to help. Source of my data progree May 2019 #32
Question llmart May 2019 #33
Not In Labor Force -- there are 96,223,000 of us. progree May 2019 #36
How do they determine this information? llmart May 2019 #44
They call a randomly selected 60,000 households each month and ask a bunch of questions progree May 2019 #45
I suspect Cheeto's having the BLS BS a little sandensea May 2019 #56
96,223,000 -- 96,223,000 -- 96,223,000 at140 May 2019 #53
How so? Baby boomers retiring for one thing. I'm one of the 96,223,000 . progree May 2019 #58
I am assuming that 96k number relates to working age 19-65 at140 May 2019 #60
The unemployment rate, LFPR, etc. is based on everyone 16 and over, even centenarians progree May 2019 #61
Good and substantive post! K&R nt at140 May 2019 #62
Thanks. I appreciate it. nt progree May 2019 #64
"Check out the trend you inherited...." mahatmakanejeeves May 2019 #38
I love the pre-2017 Benedict Donald quotes on the graph progree May 2019 #39
Just that reply tweet and its graphic in the first one you posted was spot on BumRushDaShow May 2019 #40
Additional links: mahatmakanejeeves May 2019 #43
Still have signs here to start at Mikey D's for 7.75 per hour........... Bengus81 May 2019 #46
Some news agency needs to list what jobs they count and do not count... full and part-time, double NotHardly May 2019 #48
The media could sure do a lot better job of this progree May 2019 #49
I'm old enough to remember when Blue_Tires May 2019 #52
Am I the only who looks more to types of jobs as opposed to numbers? JustFiveMoreMinutes May 2019 #54
The media tends to highlight the average hourly earnings progree May 2019 #59
That's what happens when millions of baby boomers retire. N/T Sparky 1 May 2019 #63
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATE: U.S. unemployment...»Reply #57