Latest Breaking News

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)

50. Are you familiar with the men who he appointed to his cabinet?

Reply to JackRiddler (Reply #43)

Wed Jan 2, 2019, 10:58 PM

Jan 2019

And his advisors?

Do you throw snark at everyone you disagree with?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

96 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ocasio-Cortez rips Democratic leadership over hesitancy on Green New Deal [View all] brooklynite Jan 2019 OP

Ahh, another of my predictions comes true. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #1

That was an easy one NastyRiffraff Jan 2019 #2

Does this NEW GROUP have enough votes to do to the D party what the Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #3

So she is equivalent to a Tea Party Repub? HopeAgain Jan 2019 #53

Yep. JackRiddler Jan 2019 #57

F Earth theaocp Jan 2019 #4

I have an idea, why dont you create a new thread where you outline Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #5

Begin in the OP and and go from there, theaocp Jan 2019 #8

Sadly, what the Party thinks is "too controversial" is not nearly radical enough in light of Magoo48 Jan 2019 #24

Uh huh...She is an expert already on how government works I guess. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #25

Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #38

What happened to unconditional support? melman Jan 2019 #92

civics 101, zero chance of any democratic legislation ever going into law beachbum bob Jan 2019 #35

God forbid anyone should strike a position! JackRiddler Jan 2019 #39

having symbolic votes is fine, wasting public money's on worthless positions is not, we do not beachbum bob Jan 2019 #68

It's real, not "symbolic" and your point makes no sense JackRiddler Jan 2019 #79

stunning Locrian Jan 2019 #81

Yes JackRiddler Jan 2019 #82

meanwhile - back in reality Locrian Jan 2019 #84

The only person calling them "too controversial" is Cortez.... George II Jan 2019 #7

It's all clickbait. violetpastille Jan 2019 #12

Not one day on the job and already knows more about HOW to make shit happen. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #26

How much shit has been done so far? JackRiddler Jan 2019 #40

Geez Louise, you're crabby. kstewart33 Jan 2019 #63

Gaslighting JackRiddler Jan 2019 #71

I cant keep up with the number of times this poster has personally attacked me. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #86

Eliot, yours is a wise rule. kstewart33 Jan 2019 #87

They're not personally attacking you melman Jan 2019 #91

This message was self-deleted by its author Cetacea Jan 2019 #6

I read the article. violetpastille Jan 2019 #9

I am sorry....I know she is a Democrat.... chillfactor Jan 2019 #10

The little bit I have read if accurate does outline some issues any reasonable person Eliot Rosewater Jan 2019 #11

Post removed Post removed Jan 2019 #13

"I know she is a Democrat, but..." theaocp Jan 2019 #14

Constructive criticism of Democrats is part of the TOS emulatorloo Jan 2019 #21

Can't bash Democrats on here I thought... HopeAgain Jan 2019 #54

Will cat now haz their tongue? guruoo Jan 2019 #15

She is beginning to get on my nerves katmondoo Jan 2019 #16

Geez, she is on her way to political oblivion. kstewart33 Jan 2019 #17

I would guess even fewer voted in the primary. brush Jan 2019 #31

This is extreme Lincoln abuse. JackRiddler Jan 2019 #43

Are you familiar with the men who he appointed to his cabinet? kstewart33 Jan 2019 #50

Are you familiar with the Civil War? JackRiddler Jan 2019 #55

Jack, we simply disagree. kstewart33 Jan 2019 #61

No personal insults were made and your post is a lie. JackRiddler Jan 2019 #72

A good idea's a good idea; shouldn't matter who says it. She's gotta sell a ways and means to them ancianita Jan 2019 #18

how is this news? nt msongs Jan 2019 #19

She's a meanie!!! QC Jan 2019 #20

She's not wrong on this. Voltaire2 Jan 2019 #22

Agreed. NickB79 Jan 2019 #23

It's more powerful than the committee from the last Congress. George II Jan 2019 #27

But weaker than the one from the last Democratic Congress Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #37

Yeah, don't you remember how the committee from the last Congress... JackRiddler Jan 2019 #44

Tick-tock, tick-tock . . . hatrack Jan 2019 #48

Exactly Raine Jan 2019 #66

Why is everyone on this thread trying to rip her down? Soph0571 Jan 2019 #28

b/c it's planned that way. It just does not appear out of thin air. juxtaposed Jan 2019 #30

Sometimes the best way to support someone calguy Jan 2019 #32

Hell no - If when in my 20's I has listened to that.... Soph0571 Jan 2019 #33

Stay in your lane?!? NickB79 Jan 2019 #36

Incredibly revealing. JackRiddler Jan 2019 #41

Oh god I love her! Keep it up. juxtaposed Jan 2019 #29

"No fossil fuel money on the climate committee." lapucelle Jan 2019 #34

Yeahbut... George II Jan 2019 #42

This page is a lot more revealing. JackRiddler Jan 2019 #46

You can only see a list of those donors if the candidate voluntarily discloses the information. lapucelle Jan 2019 #49

Which ones and please document your statement. JackRiddler Jan 2019 #56

Please clarify your questions and document why you think they may or may not lapucelle Jan 2019 #62

Total dodge melman Jan 2019 #73

Dodge indeed JackRiddler Jan 2019 #74

Please document your assertion after you've finished the other tasks. lapucelle Jan 2019 #85

Do we have to wait until millions and millions of people perish before doing something? ProgLibDem Jan 2019 #45

Obviously that's what some here seem to think. JackRiddler Jan 2019 #47

So doing something means shaping the committee like she wants? GulfCoast66 Jan 2019 #51

Do you know where the power comes from to generate and run the electric transportation industires? still_one Jan 2019 #58

It is unreasonable to broad brush everybody on the left. Cortez's complaint has nothing to do with JCanete Jan 2019 #64

I did not "broad brush" those on the left. I said there were just enough self-identified still_one Jan 2019 #67

COMBAT CLIMATE CHANGE, BUILD A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY, AND SECURE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE hatrack Jan 2019 #75

Your points are good, but the bottom line elections have consequences, and while the Democrats in still_one Jan 2019 #78

its not a question of what has been taken in the past. Its a new day. What we decide our politicians JCanete Jan 2019 #94

I don't know anybody on the 'left' who voted for trump... ProgLibDem Jan 2019 #90

I don't believe anyone on the left voted for trump. They either voted third party, still_one Jan 2019 #95

Wow. Not sure why or how you brought up 2016... ProgLibDem Jan 2019 #88

As long as those people Sgent Jan 2019 #59

Careful, you sound like a Tea Partier HopeAgain Jan 2019 #70

Had me going there for a second! ProgLibDem Jan 2019 #89

So Salon can't bash Hillary anymore, let's go after Pelosi, and while they are at it see if they can still_one Jan 2019 #52

Good. shanny Jan 2019 #60

Good for AOC Raine Jan 2019 #65

She is a lightning rod for every news media. We all need to remember that and... WhoWoodaKnew Jan 2019 #69

Well, her #1 was always going to be a nonstarter Blue_Tires Jan 2019 #76

she is making herself less relevant and needs to mature a bit beachbum bob Jan 2019 #77

She was elected to challenge status quo AlexSFCA Jan 2019 #80

Shouldn't element #3 be #1? Also, why isn't a "sample" already drafted? ucrdem Jan 2019 #83

I don't agree with number 1 jmowreader Jan 2019 #93

I can't find the part where AOC supposedly rips Dem leadership. Kaleva Jan 2019 #96