Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: US economy creates 96,000 jobs but figure disappoints [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)62. How many of those ...
Retired?
(I know at my employer, over the last year, 89% of those separating - 72 people - did.)
How many of those are (recent) high-school graduates that opted for advanced education full-time?
(I know at my daughter's school, they had a graduation class of 1,100 - 97% left for college, full-time, in August.)
I significant portion of that LMPR number is NOT unemployed, discouraged workers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How is that better??? The Labor Force Participation Rate is 63.5! Lowest since 1981!
Roland99
Sep 2012
#28
You know what? I don't give a rat's ass about optics. I want the people that I
SlimJimmy
Sep 2012
#49
You're not living in reality. A sound bite isn't going to get the President re-elected. People
SlimJimmy
Sep 2012
#95
And do you seriously think that's going to happen between now and Nov. 6th?
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2012
#99
What a bunch of naysayers. Uneployment dropped from 8.3 to 8.1! Can't find any thing good in
demosincebirth
Sep 2012
#41
The people in the labor force knows whether they are participating or not.
former9thward
Sep 2012
#45
Oh, so, since 90% of the people don't know what the LFPR is then that's a good thing?
Roland99
Sep 2012
#69
What I meant to say is what I said, not what you think I said or implied. eom
demosincebirth
Sep 2012
#102
And no one is graduating schools and entering the work force while those people retire, eh?
Roland99
Sep 2012
#70
The 300,000 a month that are retiring does not cover the nearly 60,000 deficit this month
SlimJimmy
Sep 2012
#97
Exactly. And don't think for a minute that the Romney campaign won't point that
SlimJimmy
Sep 2012
#50
Obama needs someone who can negotiate with congress or he has to improve this skill and fast.
dkf
Sep 2012
#56
"LMPR" - I don't recognize that acronym. Aside from that, I'm going to have
coalition_unwilling
Sep 2012
#71
It would be much lower if the republicans had not been trying to "tank the economy" .....
Botany
Sep 2012
#8
Like Gov. O'Malley (D-MD) just said on Joe Scar, when the studio audience cheered at the news:
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2012
#9
And if those public workers still had jobs their spending would have created even ...
Botany
Sep 2012
#14
Would make a nice bumper sticker with five more green bars representing 30 months growth.
julian09
Sep 2012
#39
I have a hard time cheering a lowered rate when its because a lot of people gave up looking for work
cigsandcoffee
Sep 2012
#22
At this crucial juncture in the campaign, even this tiny drop is welcome.
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2012
#26
Excellent point, 1SBM! I was going to bring this up earlier, but then forgot...
Surya Gayatri
Sep 2012
#80
Only 96K jobs added in August... Labor force participation rated lowest in decades...
totodeinhere
Sep 2012
#73
Please use the article title as the subject line and credit the correct source per LBN rules.
Rhiannon12866
Sep 2012
#101