Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nitram

(24,119 posts)
7. I can't say I've done an exhaustive review of the aviailable literature, but what I've seen is
Tue Oct 23, 2018, 09:52 AM
Oct 2018

that while there are very low levels of metabolites of broken down glyphosate in some foods, they are considered to be at levels that are not harmful. I have seen no strong evidence that glyphosate causes any "health problems" to humans "when properly applied." Bacteria break down glyphosate and render it harmless in the soil.

Your caveat regarding the phrase "when properly applied" is of concern particularly in third world countries with no regulations or oversight on the use of agricultural chemical products. What we should really be worrried about is the application of pesticides that are banned in the US on crops we import from other countries. Some of these are known carcinogens, and can have multiple harmful effects on human health. Application of such pesticides in large quantities are believed to kill hundreds of thousands of songbirds that migrate to Central and south America in the winter. Their effects on agricultural workers outside the US have not been documented, but they can't be good.

This will be appealed Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #1
This WAS an appeal. Part of the evidence the jury considered was testimony that the company was pnwmom Oct 2018 #2
Thanks for the added info PatSeg Oct 2018 #4
Yeah, I'm sorry, but junk science is still junk science Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #10
Monsanto lost because of their own emails from their own employees. pnwmom Oct 2018 #11
They lost because of scientific illiteracy Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #14
If that happened, that was wrong. But it was also wrong for Monsanto to suppress data pnwmom Oct 2018 #15
I agree with you about Bayer (not Monsanto BTW)... Steven Maurer Oct 2018 #17
Many thought the judge would totally reverse the decision, so I see this as still a win. 7962 Oct 2018 #3
The application of glyphosate makes it possible to forego the use of a number of highly toxic Nitram Oct 2018 #5
There are other options that work as well. Glyphosate is more problematic 7962 Oct 2018 #6
I can't say I've done an exhaustive review of the aviailable literature, but what I've seen is Nitram Oct 2018 #7
And more importantly, the bees. A growing problem. 7962 Oct 2018 #8
True, that. Nitram Oct 2018 #9
NO! Of concern also to first world countries where applicators just dont give a rip - Im currently Kashkakat v.2.0 Oct 2018 #16
from a link in the Guardian article scipan Oct 2018 #12
Thanks for digging deeper! n/t pnwmom Oct 2018 #13
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge upholds verdict tha...»Reply #7