Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
127. That's similar to what Sarandon said about not voting for Hillary (helping Trump win).
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 08:37 PM
Oct 2017

It's not what "I" want, or "you" want. It's "we." We Democrats as a whole.

The Party has taken the position that in red districts, where there is a blue dog Democrat who can win, the Party will support that candidate. Because if it's not a blue dog, it's a Republican who will win.

I think "we" can all agree that it's always better for a blue dog Democrat to win than a Republican.

Wouldn't it be nice right now to have a few more Dems in Congress, even if they were blue dogs? They wouldn't automatically go along with the Republican agenda. And that's a good thing. Pragmatism is how you govern, if what I've read. If you hold out for perfection, you get nothing.

I disagree with this TOTALLY. There is plenty of room at the table for anyone who supports the group Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #1
He supported that Democrat candidates can/should be anti-abortion! Crash2Parties Oct 2017 #11
Got a link? n/t left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #26
Seriously? You've already erased Heath Mellow from your memory bank? emulatorloo Oct 2017 #36
She just asked for a link. Most people citing facts should be prepared to provide a link. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #68
What's controversial about the statement of well-known fact? emulatorloo Oct 2017 #94
The fact that two people disagree on it makes it a controversial statement. Duh. nt Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #101
An actual fact is controversial? I don't think so. emulatorloo Oct 2017 #131
Guess not for those pushing an agenda left-of-center2012 Oct 2017 #95
What agenda am I allegedly pushing? Fact based here. emulatorloo Oct 2017 #96
Heath Mello, Marcy Kaptur, Tom Perriello... MrsCoffee Oct 2017 #93
bernie is pro choice questionseverything Oct 2017 #29
Remember Heath Mello? Guess not n/t emulatorloo Oct 2017 #38
bernie's statement on that questionseverything Oct 2017 #43
so you saying perez is anti abortion too? questionseverything Oct 2017 #45
No, both Perez and Sanders are pro-choice. emulatorloo Oct 2017 #49
And that's okay that he did that. It's an area where that is the only viable option... Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #63
Some would call that, "thowing people with uteruses under the bus" to get what you want. Crash2Parties Oct 2017 #67
That's similar to what Sarandon said about not voting for Hillary (helping Trump win). Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #127
So it's okay to be pragmatic about choice.... LisaM Oct 2017 #126
So are 99% of the Democratic Senators, Governors, House members... brooklynite Oct 2017 #98
well since many prominent women turned down the invatation questionseverything Oct 2017 #123
Should? Disingenuous statement. KPN Oct 2017 #102
Room at the table. Not HEAD of the table. pnwmom Oct 2017 #13
Very Clear Distinction Me. Oct 2017 #53
He is "A" featured speaker. Not "the headliner." There can be several featured speakers. nt Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #64
Wrong. He is the LEAD SPEAKER. He is the HEADLINER. pnwmom Oct 2017 #65
Much ado about nothing. They were lucky to get him. Looks like Hillary & all other notable females Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #69
Wrong. Maxine Waters is a notable woman and she didn't turn them down. She's going to be there pnwmom Oct 2017 #70
Waters is the KEYNOTE SPEAKER. Bernie is opening the convention (not keynote speaker). Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #72
That's what they are saying now, after the backlash. pnwmom Oct 2017 #85
No. Maxine Waters is the KEYNOTE SPEAKER. Sanders is the opening act. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #73
Tamika Mallory walked back her statement about Bernie being the headliner pnwmom Oct 2017 #80
I don't think so. The convention is named in honor of Waters. "Reclaiming Our Time." Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #81
That SOUNDS logical, but when they appropriated Maxine's theme, they still hadn't announced pnwmom Oct 2017 #82
I agree. riversedge Oct 2017 #83
Every year our State Democratic Party holds a Women's Brunch (which is more than just eating).... George II Oct 2017 #19
Well, Emily's List can sponsor an event and pick their keynote speaker karynnj Oct 2017 #2
You may recall there was some kerfuffle with the organizers of the women's march in February. LisaM Oct 2017 #4
I don't get what your problem with who THEY have at THEIR conference is karynnj Oct 2017 #8
Well, it's actually advertised as "The Women's Conference"... LisaM Oct 2017 #9
Are the main people who organized it women? karynnj Oct 2017 #16
I suggest you not insinuate your fellow DU'ers are hypocrites because they disagree w you emulatorloo Oct 2017 #48
Men have historically been part of the women's movement in America. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #71
Wow, are you serious? LisaM Oct 2017 #104
Use your noggin & look up history. Who do you think gave women the vote? Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #105
WHAT????? LisaM Oct 2017 #108
It was exclusively hundreds of men who VOTED to give women the vote & pass the 19th amendment. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #111
I can't believe I'm even in this exchange. LisaM Oct 2017 #112
These are just facts. What's your beef with facts and reality? But for men, you would not be able to Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #114
I'm not going to alert you, even though I should. LisaM Oct 2017 #115
Men are not automatically anti-women's rights. But for them, we would not have the vote. Here it is: Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #113
Is anyone else reading this mansplaining manifesto? LisaM Oct 2017 #117
This started when I pointed out that men have historically played a key part in women's rights. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #119
Please stop. LisaM Oct 2017 #120
The first WOMEN's convention in 40 years shouldn't be headlined by a MAN, pnwmom Oct 2017 #14
It is NOT the first women's convention in 40 years! karynnj Oct 2017 #18
The organizers are billing it as the first national Women's Convention in 40 years: George II Oct 2017 #21
Well, by their choice of their headline speaker, they have inadvertently made it NOT be pnwmom Oct 2017 #30
This whole thing is maddening. LisaM Oct 2017 #118
It is called a "Women's Convention" sheshe2 Oct 2017 #20
It's Tamika Mallory. 'Nuff said. As a POC myself, she does not speak for me. This was a mistake, Tarheel_Dem Oct 2017 #40
I know. eom sheshe2 Oct 2017 #44
And Nina Me. Oct 2017 #54
Exactly. nt Tarheel_Dem Oct 2017 #66
And Nomiki emulatorloo Oct 2017 #99
Intersting GaryCnf Oct 2017 #128
I don't know what to tell ya. Find better friends? Tarheel_Dem Oct 2017 #129
Lol GaryCnf Oct 2017 #130
I think Sanders could have declined being the headliner and say he would gladly be a speaker. riversedge Oct 2017 #116
He's not the headliner melman Oct 2017 #124
I had forgotten that at first. deurbano Oct 2017 #10
Yeah, it was really a divisive move. LisaM Oct 2017 #12
It's not Emily's List's convention. But the group can choose its keynote, and its MAXINE WATERS. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #74
Thanks. karynnj Oct 2017 #89
I'll just drop this here... Purveyor Oct 2017 #3
THANK YOU. LisaM Oct 2017 #6
boy, that Bernie Sanders just can't do anything right, can he? ProfessorPlum Oct 2017 #5
Glad they're speaking out.... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #7
I'm sorry, did he force his way in to speak ? kacekwl Oct 2017 #15
Sanders polls as the most popular politician in America today. Irish_Dem Oct 2017 #17
No he doesn't. George II Oct 2017 #22
Truth. Thank you. NurseJackie Oct 2017 #24
Just so you know... OilemFirchen Oct 2017 #31
Hah, good one, thanks! I actually thought it was Stolichnaya that would be replaced by Smirnoff. George II Oct 2017 #35
... emulatorloo Oct 2017 #42
Joementum cadmium Oct 2017 #23
wow, that is a flat out untruth ProfessorPlum Oct 2017 #106
That lie has been debunked more times than I care to count. n/t Tarheel_Dem Oct 2017 #41
It will be up to Bernie Sanders if he wants to opt out..he has time..Oct 27..today Oct 12.. Stuart G Oct 2017 #25
This is nothing more than a Bernie for POTUS in '20 advertisement. Tamika Mallory is not to be.... Tarheel_Dem Oct 2017 #46
Might want to check your facts. Don't automatically believe what you THINK you read. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #75
Depends on how you look at it Philistein Oct 2017 #27
Interesting way to look at it, & after seeing at least 200+ concerts in my life I get your point! NT CaptainTruth Oct 2017 #34
According to "Women's March", Hillary Clinton is NOT speaking. And they've been very vague.... George II Oct 2017 #121
I guess Bernie is warming up for Maxine. Philistein Oct 2017 #122
First, Maxine Waters needs no "warming up". And it's a women's convention, one would think.... George II Oct 2017 #125
Post removed Post removed Oct 2017 #28
Poor choice for a headline speaker. brer cat Oct 2017 #32
I don't know all the details but if this is a Women's Convention I feel the opening/keynote/first... CaptainTruth Oct 2017 #33
So, organizers of a Women's Convention can't CHOOSE who they ask to speak? FailureToCommunicate Oct 2017 #37
Then you failed to read my post 20, FailureToCommunicate. sheshe2 Oct 2017 #47
Of course they can. Sorry, don't see a single post that says "this is Bernie's doing" emulatorloo Oct 2017 #51
After reading this thread, it's asy to understand why democrank Oct 2017 #39
Democrats lost seats because they voted for the stimulus and Obamacare emulatorloo Oct 2017 #50
+1. nt Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #76
no shit. Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #90
Can't help but wonder Jake Stern Oct 2017 #52
Something tells me it would be odd to have any man open a women's convention emulatorloo Oct 2017 #55
Tone deaf. Justice Oct 2017 #56
Somebody tried to smear folks as "hypocrites" up thread as well emulatorloo Oct 2017 #58
I see no problem with a man being an opening act for the keynote speaker, who is female... Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #79
I doubt the outcome of any US elections will be decided based on this thread emulatorloo Oct 2017 #97
It's an attitude & lack of pragmatism & focus on the big picture that'll cost. Susan Sarandon effect Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #100
The keynote speaker at a women's convention should be a woman. Beacool Oct 2017 #59
It's amazing and very discouraging that some progressives cannot understand this. n/t pnwmom Oct 2017 #61
Yes, it is. Beacool Oct 2017 #62
+1. nt Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #77
It wasn't, though, was it? treestar Oct 2017 #87
I agree with this tweet from Peter Daou. Beacool Oct 2017 #57
Well, it's 2016-17 in a nutshell! pnwmom Oct 2017 #60
But those things are unrelated. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #78
Sadly, so true. riversedge Oct 2017 #84
Makes no sense treestar Oct 2017 #86
I agree with Emily's list. Wondering about these organizers... Madam45for2923 Oct 2017 #88
maybe they recognize a popular ally ProfessorPlum Oct 2017 #107
Nah! We gots to agree to disagree on this one, won't we? Madam45for2923 Oct 2017 #109
This message was self-deleted by its author JonLP24 Oct 2017 #91
Damn right it does. The tone deafness continues. MrsCoffee Oct 2017 #92
Yep! Tone deafness is right. Madam45for2923 Oct 2017 #103
K&R Gothmog Oct 2017 #110
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EMILY's List: Sanders hea...»Reply #127