Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
6. Yeah, it's a short jaunt across the river here
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jul 2012

And I would agree with Tahiti Nut that it would likely be a lot of actual commuters most of the time.

I could also see some use for getting to the casinos or weekend nights on the town. That's probably the main tourism draw between Detroit and Windsor - a change of scene for the locals and suburbanites. In both cities most casinos and a lot of nightlife are close to where this boat terminal is.

Detroit's riverfront has changed for the better in the last few years. In this case the terminal is already there. My first instinct at the headline was 'cool!'.

I would need to know more about what is behind this (and I am too lazy/distracted to research at the moment, LOL) before having a real strong opinion - goodness knows Detroit is being bought cheap and nasty in some ways right now by developers and others with pure profit motive, so I am skeptical of just about everything (eg the new bridge).

But there may be some logic to doing this, aside from some private profit situation.

Be wary, residents of Detroit... Earth_First Jul 2012 #1
Rochester-T.O.: 95 mi (154km) KamaAina Jul 2012 #2
Perhaps... Earth_First Jul 2012 #3
Yeah, it's a short jaunt across the river here Cal Carpenter Jul 2012 #6
I seriously doubt any "tourism" dollars would justify it. TahitiNut Jul 2012 #4
That will be convenient for attending the "Windsor Ballet". bluedigger Jul 2012 #5
Why would I line up for a ferry... roamer65 Jul 2012 #7
Crickets. GeorgeGist Jul 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. wants Detroit-Windso...»Reply #6