Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
29. It would depend on whether Mitt had a financial interest in the specific deals.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 07:10 PM
Jul 2012

Think of Bain as an ocean liner with many watertight compartments. Each compartment is created as a LLC, corporation, partnership, etc. separate from the whole and separate from each other.

That way, if a particular deal makes money, some of it flows to the owners of the specific deal. If a particular deal goes sour, the losses affect only the capital furnished by participants in the specific deal. Even a spectacularly bad deal, e.g. you buy a company with what turns out to be an EPA superfund site, it doesn't sink Bain as a whole and it doesn't create an unlimited liability for the participants.

Romney has both an MBA and a JD from Harvard.

Setting up ownership structures to maximize control with minimum assets, limit liability, minimize taxes, and maximize returns is corporate law 101.

I know I'm not the most business savvy person alive, but madashelltoo Jul 2012 #1
Have to read the agreements, elleng Jul 2012 #6
But what would make partner a partner? Shares in the company. Atman Jul 2012 #11
Partners in waiting… targetpractice Jul 2012 #13
But he still listed himself as SOLE owner. Atman Jul 2012 #15
Yeah, he was sole owner until he wasn't anymore in 2002… targetpractice Jul 2012 #25
'Shares' do not make one a partner. elleng Jul 2012 #21
He might have been a partner after Romneys exit pschoeb Jul 2012 #16
Bain is the umbrella TeamPooka Jul 2012 #18
Bain Capital is a Limited Liabilty Company FarCenter Jul 2012 #19
Thanks for adding this element of clarity. elleng Jul 2012 #22
This is pretty damn bad if Conard is admitting it. n/t Raven Jul 2012 #2
He wasn't "an" owner of the firm. obxhead Jul 2012 #3
To Bain or not to Bain tooeyeten Jul 2012 #4
Conard said Romney's GREED was the sticking point ProgressiveEconomist Jul 2012 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jul 2012 #7
So it's Conard and the Canard?! tblue Jul 2012 #8
But only retroactively Jessy169 Jul 2012 #9
Oh My..Say it ain't so..Joe...nt Stuart G Jul 2012 #10
Now we need to know what kind of golden parachute Bain took JDPriestly Jul 2012 #12
The money gained from bain is hard to explain Botany Jul 2012 #14
Yeah, but this is making us look bad and Kingofalldems Jul 2012 #17
Everything is so complex because one cannot bonniebgood Jul 2012 #20
The mother ship is Bain Capital LLC FarCenter Jul 2012 #23
But This Opens A New Can Of Worms For Romney DallasNE Jul 2012 #24
Also Mittens used Bain Iliyah Jul 2012 #26
Mainstream media is spinning like fury to put Mr. Bain in a good light Rosa Luxemburg Jul 2012 #27
Did he profit from the deals done during those 3 years b/4 he was bought off? Dustlawyer Jul 2012 #28
It would depend on whether Mitt had a financial interest in the specific deals. FarCenter Jul 2012 #29
who is romney kidding? Harley Jacobson Jul 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former Bain Capital partn...»Reply #29