Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
7. The count seems to be 9 Hillary electors and that same Pub from TX who already denounced Trump
Mon Dec 12, 2016, 01:23 PM
Dec 2016

Don't get your hopes up, the pub electors do not appear to be breaking ranks.

Sounds like a first MFM008 Dec 2016 #1
Write to EC at http://www.asktheelectors.org wordpix Dec 2016 #20
thanks for the link wordpix NoMoreRepugs Dec 2016 #31
Sorry to Throw a Wet Blanket on This Leith Dec 2016 #55
Look yours up on facebook sarah FAILIN Dec 2016 #58
DOT 'ORG' is not a DOT GOV website. please don't give them any personal information. Sunlei Dec 2016 #61
Thank YOU. riversedge Dec 2016 #65
Here's a clue about n whether Trump is fit to serve as President: world wide wally Dec 2016 #2
Excellent. blue neen Dec 2016 #3
They may also want to be briefed on any criminal inquiries! Coyotl Dec 2016 #4
subpoena AlexSFCA Dec 2016 #5
for sure Ghouly was at least one link between Trump camp and Russia wordpix Dec 2016 #22
Thats why 'Ghouly' had to refuse the 'job' because extensive background security check required. Sunlei Dec 2016 #62
Not the CIA. Well, not legally anyway. Angleae Dec 2016 #59
Good! hamsterjill Dec 2016 #6
The count seems to be 9 Hillary electors and that same Pub from TX who already denounced Trump Amishman Dec 2016 #7
They sure don't. Electors from 5 states only at this point. Hortensis Dec 2016 #8
Is it true that electors in 29 states are obliged to vote for the winner in that state? secondwind Dec 2016 #9
It's an untried law, from what I've read, but Hortensis Dec 2016 #11
terrible; however nothing in Amendment XII states electors must vote a certain way wordpix Dec 2016 #24
Kind of like the difference between delegates and superdelegates right? Calista241 Dec 2016 #44
To the best of my knowledge, Calista. If any break Hortensis Dec 2016 #50
Even so, the penalties are slight and the laws requiring them to so so may be unconstitutional. PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #40
Yep awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #16
Silly question for today: If enough electors change or refuse to vote Trump into office, Ford_Prefect Dec 2016 #10
Congress could refuse to certify some votes NYC Liberal Dec 2016 #13
Amendment XII - getting most EC votes wins presidency and if a tie, q goes to the House wordpix Dec 2016 #25
Not getting "most" -- getting a majority. onenote Dec 2016 #39
It gets kicked to the House of Reps. This is the process. I would riversedge Dec 2016 #33
If no one gets 270 electoral votes (and remember electors can vote for anyone)... PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #41
it is a silly question. it makes no sense to think the electors would act but still mopinko Dec 2016 #53
Pointless zipplewrath Dec 2016 #12
Fine by me. I'm all for doing anything to weaken any NYC Liberal Dec 2016 #14
Drain the Swamp zipplewrath Dec 2016 #15
That too. Every hit counts. NYC Liberal Dec 2016 #17
Don't trip over ourselves zipplewrath Dec 2016 #23
I agree. But I don't think this is a meaningless controversy. NYC Liberal Dec 2016 #32
Not for Trump zipplewrath Dec 2016 #52
It doesn't matter if he has a mandate or not. Calista241 Dec 2016 #45
Defeatism is why we lose Jean-Jacques Roussea Dec 2016 #30
Get ready to watch zipplewrath Dec 2016 #51
Doing everything we can to make him illegitimate is a win in my book adigal Dec 2016 #47
TWO years. Ugh. Pretty soon the 'cycle" will be non stop. nt 7962 Dec 2016 #54
At the very least, I am CERTAIN this will make the Orange Rectum pucker. BigDemVoter Dec 2016 #18
weatherman says expect a tweetstorm wordpix Dec 2016 #26
Im interested who he will go,after tonight in his Nuremberg Tour, Part III adigal Dec 2016 #48
Funny you asked! BigDemVoter Dec 2016 #49
ray of hope AlexSFCA Dec 2016 #19
this 12/19 date could be moved back, geesh. Will they melt if the vote is in Jan? wordpix Dec 2016 #29
even better AlexSFCA Dec 2016 #34
I just tweeted this to Podesta. Move back the date! wordpix Dec 2016 #37
Congress sets the date. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #42
Red pilling the electors is a must Jean-Jacques Roussea Dec 2016 #36
CNN just reported that Podesta is calling for this too! Glimmer of Hope Dec 2016 #21
podesta says Clinton campaign backs effort to get Electoral College voters intel briefing on Russian riversedge Dec 2016 #27
msnbc is reporting on Clinton camp approval--and politico story riversedge Dec 2016 #28
very nice, HRC still has some fight. You go, girl! wordpix Dec 2016 #35
In light of the orig. article posted re: leaderless Dems in Congress, here's hoping HRC wordpix Dec 2016 #38
And when the request is denied, as it will be, then what? onenote Dec 2016 #43
For the sake of America and democracy, this must happen Achilleaze Dec 2016 #46
There is little doubt that humbled_opinion Dec 2016 #56
if 36 voters or 7% change their votes the fun will really begin. Kablooie Dec 2016 #57
correction AlexSFCA Dec 2016 #60
Thank you, NYC Liberal! Cha Dec 2016 #63
Christine Pelosi-the elector who, along with other electiors, was just on msnbc. She riversedge Dec 2016 #64
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Electors demand intellige...»Reply #7