http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2012/06/chris_christies_transportation.html
Chris Christie's transportation bond bill: Read it and weep
Published: Sunday, June 24, 2012, 8:19 AM Updated: Sunday, June 24, 2012, 3:39 PM
By Paul Mulshine/The Star Ledger
Back when he was a candidate for governor, Chris Christie characterized his predecessors penchant for borrowing as unconscionable. He promised his policy would be We should go pay-as-you-go with current budget funds. So I was shocked last week when I got a call from George Humphris of Toms River.
<...>
That was Christies campaign promise to let New Jerseyans vote on all future bonding.
The bill in question would permit the state to borrow $3.4 billion to refill the Transportation Trust Fund -
without a referendum on the November ballot.
<...>
I thanked Humphris for the call and promised Id read the bill in question. I called up bill S-2020 (
http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bills/BillView.asp ) on my computer and read all 24 pages. I read it again. And again.
I couldnt make the slightest bit of sense out of it. It had been a long day. The next morning I put on a pot of coffee and read the bill again. I still couldnt penetrate the prose, so I put in a call to Steve Lonegan.
Hes the former Bogota mayor who unsuccessfully challenged Christie for the GOP gubernatorial nomination back in 2009. Lonegan has been obsessed with out-of-control borrowing since the administration of the first governor named Christie. In 2000 he filed a lawsuit to stop the Whitman administration from bonding without voter approval. That suit failed but a later suit was a success. And then in 2008 voters passed a constitutional amendment banning bonding without voter approval.
I read Lonegan passages from the bill like the one that created a Subaccount for Prior Bonds and a Subaccount for Debt Service for Transportation Program Bonds.
What the heck? he said.
I read him the passage about how the revenue would come from a tax amended by section 18 of P.L.1992, c.23, and repealed by section 56 of P.L.2010, c.22 and now imposed pursuant to 1[R.S.54:39-103] section 3 of P.L.2010, c.22 (C.54:39-103)1.
Huh? he said.
On Thursday morning I drank an extra cup of coffee and headed for Trenton. Once there, I ordered another cup of coffee and pulled the bill up on my laptop. I showed it to legislators and to lobbyists. Not a single one could figure out the dodge that made this borrowing legal.
<...>