Latest Breaking News

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)

187. Do hope so

Reply to psychopomp (Reply #180)

Thu May 26, 2016, 05:12 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

187 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State Dept. watchdog: Clinton violated email rules [View all] laserhaas May 2016 OP

Has Kerry been interviewed about this? Apparently he initiated the internal investigation at State JudyM May 2016 #1

I think everybody is starting to distance themselves (like Virgina Gov.) - from her laserhaas May 2016 #3

OMG!! Please! Laser102 May 2016 #22

Bingo. forest444 May 2016 #43

They are on board a modern day Titanic, and are spell bound by the music of lady may laserhaas May 2016 #46

"I don't belong to an organized political party," Will Rogers famously quipped. forest444 May 2016 #47

JFK - expanded on Rogers greatest, with the remarks, apropos, lambasting secrecy laserhaas May 2016 #55

"Herr" Allen Dulles and his entourage musn't have liked that speech one bit. forest444 May 2016 #122

Like Dulles being put in charge of Warren laserhaas May 2016 #127

Like Dulles being put in charge of Warren laserhaas May 2016 #128

Like Dulles being put in charge of Warren laserhaas May 2016 #129

Naturally. forest444 May 2016 #135

Ah ..Ha Ha...so apropos...I'm stealing this picture laserhaas May 2016 #141

Happy you liked it, Laserhaas. forest444 May 2016 #144

I know...part of keeping everybody partly content laserhaas May 2016 #146

Works with my girlfriend. forest444 May 2016 #157

I think Sanders has stayed in b/c he knew this was coming psychopomp May 2016 #180

Do hope so laserhaas May 2016 #187

I'd vote for her but her numbers against Trump really going down. 2 polls show her losing 2 Trump bjobotts May 2016 #82

More GOP hack job attacks on HRC45 Cryptoad May 2016 #45

That damn RW Associated Press! Ned_Devine May 2016 #77

This is getting to be a tired response to EVERYTHING about the Clintons... Moostache May 2016 #81

If u goijng to stand with GOP attacks Cryptoad May 2016 #88

Because every criticism of HRC is either a RW hack job or sexist. Yeah, we know... JudyM May 2016 #128

Yup...but dont dare call crtiques of Bernie laserhaas May 2016 #142

This pretty much sums up how I feel at this point. thucythucy May 2016 #183

Everything is always the fault of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. ... spin May 2016 #132

What specifically and objectively leads you to that belief? LanternWaste May 2016 #86

Pelosi is doing it too...and you dont see other politicos laserhaas May 2016 #98

In the full report the only current and past SOS who did not consent to in view was Clinton LiberalArkie May 2016 #4

Wondering about more public media interviews, sorry, my question was ambiguous. JudyM May 2016 #8

It says he was interviewed as part of the report. Hillary declined. nt IdaBriggs May 2016 #5

Right, I meant in the media. I haven't seen him. This might be the start... JudyM May 2016 #6

He will probably stay out of it. If he comes forward.... IdaBriggs May 2016 #10

Seems so, but since he's the 1 who started the ball rolling, the media is going to want him up front JudyM May 2016 #12

You can't sugar coat the fact that Hillary, nor her aides, had any right to delete laserhaas May 2016 #18

Boxer on CNN said she didn't do anything differently than prior SOSs - and that she apologized(!) JudyM May 2016 #134

I did mothing...I know nothing laserhaas May 2016 #164

Kerry has to stay out of it since this is an inspector generals investigation. He really LiberalArkie May 2016 #13

And the report is finished, and since he's the head of State... JudyM May 2016 #15

Damn, I read that story 3 times and each time I read it that the report was leaked to Politico, LiberalArkie May 2016 #24

Yeah, right?! 83 pages, done. Released midweek. I'm thinking Kerry is going to have to step out JudyM May 2016 #27

I think both will take a "it is what it is" and neither condemn nor apologize for her behavior. LiberalArkie May 2016 #30

The State Department IG should be at the cameras. I think both Kerry and Obama are in Vietnam. karynnj May 2016 #53

I think Kerry has handled it exactly correctly Yupster May 2016 #25

Totally agree. Totally professional in all respects. As are most public servants. LiberalArkie May 2016 #31

What part of he handed it over to the SD IG did you miss? That is the sense in which it is said that karynnj May 2016 #64

Interviewed by the media. But thanks for the "tone." JudyM May 2016 #120

I have a list of email news that were "Yuuuge" Douseeme May 2016 #2

.. frylock May 2016 #14

I love you, frylock dorkzilla May 2016 #90

Ha ha.... laserhaas May 2016 #99

Oh, you! frylock May 2016 #106

Reminds me of a really old felix_numinous May 2016 #104

She chop, she chop... dorkzilla May 2016 #119

Yep, grade-A fresh off the shelf Brockoli! n/t Jester Messiah May 2016 #110

Complying to FOIA is for little people. bahrbearian May 2016 #7

Another much ado about nothing. leftofcool May 2016 #9

The fact that you are so obtuse to how sad that state of affairs is - vexes the entire nation laserhaas May 2016 #11

OMG Pearl clutching! leftofcool May 2016 #17

If being obtuse is contagious, I best put someone on ignore ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #34

Nothing criminal. Just sloppy. Oh dear. What are we to do now? I know. Let's go to the next scandal. Laser102 May 2016 #16

I think Bernie supporters already have. Vince Foster, Monica leftofcool May 2016 #19

Oh please! Duval May 2016 #54

Yes, the DOJ is full of Bernie supporters. Derr! Ned_Devine May 2016 #79

Say What!....Sorry Ned...I'm calling bullchit on this one. laserhaas May 2016 #101

Sorry, I don't know how to use the sarcasm thingy Ned_Devine May 2016 #102

Ha ha...its at the bottom of the smileys...tap the 3 dots laserhaas May 2016 #115

Done! Ned_Devine May 2016 #123

This report is something new - a lambaste critique laserhaas May 2016 #67

Back to Benghazi we go. L. Coyote May 2016 #23

Great defense for a president. "I wasn't criminal, just incompetent." (n/t) thesquanderer May 2016 #26

You can't point out - how dark the cave is - to the willfully blind laserhaas May 2016 #35

I am willing to bet that could be applied to almost every President at time or another cstanleytech May 2016 #76

She chose not to comply. That's not sloppiness, that's not accidental, that's on purpose. panader0 May 2016 #40

I'm not so sure about the mens rea/scienter of this particular issue; but do concur with the laserhaas May 2016 #41

"Vote Clinton, she's Not Criminal!" yeah ok go with that. yodermon May 2016 #107

Or a certain future of 999 other politicis pulling similar stunts laserhaas May 2016 #170

Care to bet on that? DisgustipatedinCA May 2016 #29

I think criminal obstruction is already established; but I'd make a wager laserhaas May 2016 #36

Why not - because it's Clinton? 840high May 2016 #69

Becasue fuck ethics! nt Gore1FL May 2016 #92

Been that way...for a while laserhaas May 2016 #103

If that is the biggest concern, this is bigger than Benghazi! And that is Yooouuuuge! L. Coyote May 2016 #20

Still going through the motions. No crimes. No indictments. Sorry, 'Not Hillary' Party. nt onehandle May 2016 #21

"Hillary Clinton did not comply with the agency’s policies on records" blackspade May 2016 #33

Its not "her turn" yet CountAllVotes May 2016 #48

State Department report on Clinton's email practices LiberalArkie May 2016 #28

It Begins Worldly Traveler May 2016 #32

Her diehards will just blame it on Bernie laserhaas May 2016 #39

H. Clinton is lawyered up and "remaining silent." tabasco May 2016 #37

For sure. Trump (or Mitt - or who ever) will not play as nice as Bernie has laserhaas May 2016 #38

Glad the report is out -- let's get the slap of the hand overwith Politicub May 2016 #42

You think this is the ONLY report? merbex May 2016 #50

Concur! - But we shouldn't have to buckle up - this crap should have been written off - already laserhaas May 2016 #56

That post reminds me of the Affluenza kid. n/t Jester Messiah May 2016 #112

Except for the fact...they cant run....anywhere laserhaas May 2016 #171

Oh NO,,,,,, Emails,,,, Oh the horror of it all! Drink! Cryptoad May 2016 #44

You are embarrassing yourself, whether you know it or not. Drank too much kool-aid? Read the report. JudyM May 2016 #138

Yup...you and Kerry should never dare... laserhaas May 2016 #143

I knew abt the counting disabilty Cryptoad May 2016 #153

I'll say it slower: Powell. And. Rice. Had. Different. Rules. JudyM May 2016 #154

I try it slower,,,,,,,report says no such thing Cryptoad May 2016 #155

. JudyM May 2016 #158

Ha...this one is Spot On true..but the other one with fox in laserhaas May 2016 #165

Why is Politico using the word "Review" instead of calling it what it is; an INVESTIGATION? nt 99th_Monkey May 2016 #49

Hey, she may still skate by to the nomination, and get into the WH, by (whatever) type of election laserhaas May 2016 #57

It's exceedingly odd, after the FBI itself goes out of its way to scream "stop using 'review'" 99th_Monkey May 2016 #61

Evidently, you don't know who I am - and how much my whistleblowing, against RICO Romney laserhaas May 2016 #65

Ok vadermike May 2016 #51

I don't know about that. He's got issues, including misogny - that will be banging away at a woman laserhaas May 2016 #59

Why no mention that this kind of sloppy practice was a long-standing problem at the State Dept? stopbush May 2016 #52

On this item, I concur, this report could actually be a well thought out - Test the Waters dynamic laserhaas May 2016 #60

There isn't any exculpatory evidence for Hillary in the DOS Report. leveymg May 2016 #71

She isn't going to be president? stopbush May 2016 #78

Rice is mentioned 13x, Powell 17x, Hillary 125x in the report. riderinthestorm May 2016 #73

Er, could the mentions be high for Hillary stopbush May 2016 #80

I was responding to the "others did it too" statement only riderinthestorm May 2016 #85

With oligarchs..the wheels grind super slow laserhaas May 2016 #118

Even then, all the Rice counts simply are listing her in various places karynnj May 2016 #91

I`m really curious.... democrank May 2016 #58

If it were anybody else, even Bill or Obama (much less Kerry) - this would NOT be okay laserhaas May 2016 #63

Nothing will happen to Clinton hollowdweller May 2016 #62

Sad state of affairs that your reflection - is possibly - Spot On laserhaas May 2016 #68

Nothing will happen because her practices were no worse than multiple Secretaries before her. pnwmom May 2016 #70

Which former SOS routed 100% of their emails Press Virginia May 2016 #83

Colin Powell exclusively used his AOL account for non-classified govt. emails, pnwmom May 2016 #87

That is untrue. Press Virginia May 2016 #93

That is untrue. There has been no evidence that anything on her server was classified pnwmom May 2016 #96

Sigh. Still makin' stuff up. Here's your evidence. Android3.14 May 2016 #105

Yup...Luv the babbling banter obfuscating ...incongruous laserhaas May 2016 #121

You apparently aren't capable of reading and understanding your own links, pnwmom May 2016 #136

I believe Clinton did not even have a state.gov account so explain what you mean by she used secure hollowdweller May 2016 #178

She used the SCIF system for classified emails. That was the only secure system pnwmom May 2016 #179

No. Nothing will happen because the money and power are behind her. hollowdweller May 2016 #177

So? youceyec May 2016 #66

Yes. And the bottom line is that Clinton's set up was no worse than multiple pnwmom May 2016 #72

Powell didn't decline to use a SD E-mail because of privacy Press Virginia May 2016 #94

Neither Hillary nor Powell used a .gov account for non-classified. And both of them pnwmom May 2016 #95

Again. That is untrue. Press Virginia May 2016 #100

You have a fundamental misunderstanding. Hillary, like Powell, used the secure SCIF system pnwmom May 2016 #133

Then how did TS/SAP information end up on her server. Press Virginia May 2016 #137

That information was retroactively classified. And she could and did access the secure SCIF system. pnwmom May 2016 #139

No, it was not. The IG has already stated he found 4 e-mails that were classified at the time Press Virginia May 2016 #140

You keep making false assertions with zero evidence. She had the full authority to decide pnwmom May 2016 #148

As someone who worked for a contracter that built SCIFS, I can say without a doubt Press Virginia May 2016 #150

There was construction on her house that was done for the SCIF. pnwmom May 2016 #152

good to know. Press Virginia May 2016 #160

Yawnn...facts scmacks...gimmie more millions laserhaas May 2016 #166

The contents of the Sid "Keep 'em Coming" Blumenthal emails were NSA documents leveymg May 2016 #156

Some people are going to be really surprised when she's actually charged with a crime Press Virginia May 2016 #159

To tell you the truth, I think a deal has already been reached. They've had since March 2015 to leveymg May 2016 #161

Do you really think she's going to give up? The one thing the Clinton's don't do Press Virginia May 2016 #162

This is a lot bigger than marital infidelity, and she has made many enemies, including at NSA leveymg May 2016 #163

And the Secret Service and (possibly ) Obama laserhaas May 2016 #169

This wo7ld be plausible...if she already stepped down laserhaas May 2016 #168

Yup..^^.this + 1000 ^^ laserhaas May 2016 #167

And so did Condoleezza . nt leftyladyfrommo May 2016 #108

Rice claims not to have used e-mail Press Virginia May 2016 #109

Not at all? leftyladyfrommo May 2016 #114

That's the claim. I don't know if it's true or not. Press Virginia May 2016 #117

In January NBC and CNN leftyladyfrommo May 2016 #124

yeah but only one person was using a personal server. Press Virginia May 2016 #126

Powell destroyed "millions" of emails? yodermon May 2016 #111

It's the HRC defense. Sure Hillary had a nonsecure server in her basement Press Virginia May 2016 #116

OMG...is that why he didnt run for President? laserhaas May 2016 #175

But no consequences. nt valerief May 2016 #74

"Did Not Comply"... "Chose Not To Cooperate"... Didn't she proclaim full/complete cooperation? AzDar May 2016 #75

she's evolved on this issue Press Virginia May 2016 #113

I think we are all...being tested...by this P.R. laserhaas May 2016 #125

I think the media is going to do their best to bury the story Press Virginia May 2016 #131

Its possible...its possible laserhaas May 2016 #172

We also find out there were, at least, 2 hacking attempts Press Virginia May 2016 #84

She violated rules, but is too big of a name to be prosecuted fbc May 2016 #89

They weren't rules they were federal regulations and laws SusanLarson May 2016 #97

Former USAG Mukasey said the same bout § 2071 laserhaas May 2016 #173

"Clinton declined to be interviewed" Babel_17 May 2016 #145

She pled the.....umm...I have the right to laserhaas May 2016 #147

Clinton’s actions were unlawful under either federal records preservation laws or criminal laws Justice May 2016 #149

Oligarchs are only unlawful....if the puss off other oligarchs laserhaas May 2016 #151

By the way..thanks for Bloomberg link laserhaas May 2016 #174

... FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #176

My perfect world of Bernie v Romney..just may happen laserhaas May 2016 #181

Thanks for the heads-up, laserhaas! Octafish May 2016 #182

So much wrong..and so little we can do about it laserhaas May 2016 #184

The Aspens look like a forest, yet they're cloned from one tree, grown from the roots. Octafish May 2016 #185

Whoa laserhaas May 2016 #186