Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: State Dept. watchdog: Clinton violated email rules [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)161. To tell you the truth, I think a deal has already been reached. They've had since March 2015 to
do succession planning for her candidacy. All she has to do is agree to release her delegates, to never again run for public office, and the President will pardon her at the end of his term. The AG runs out the clock until then. The FBI may not ever make a recommendation, but will list her acts that mishandled classified information and the laws implicated, and will state it is up to the DoJ to determine whether to indict her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
187 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Has Kerry been interviewed about this? Apparently he initiated the internal investigation at State
JudyM
May 2016
#1
I think everybody is starting to distance themselves (like Virgina Gov.) - from her
laserhaas
May 2016
#3
They are on board a modern day Titanic, and are spell bound by the music of lady may
laserhaas
May 2016
#46
"I don't belong to an organized political party," Will Rogers famously quipped.
forest444
May 2016
#47
JFK - expanded on Rogers greatest, with the remarks, apropos, lambasting secrecy
laserhaas
May 2016
#55
"Herr" Allen Dulles and his entourage musn't have liked that speech one bit.
forest444
May 2016
#122
I'd vote for her but her numbers against Trump really going down. 2 polls show her losing 2 Trump
bjobotts
May 2016
#82
Because every criticism of HRC is either a RW hack job or sexist. Yeah, we know...
JudyM
May 2016
#128
In the full report the only current and past SOS who did not consent to in view was Clinton
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#4
Seems so, but since he's the 1 who started the ball rolling, the media is going to want him up front
JudyM
May 2016
#12
You can't sugar coat the fact that Hillary, nor her aides, had any right to delete
laserhaas
May 2016
#18
Boxer on CNN said she didn't do anything differently than prior SOSs - and that she apologized(!)
JudyM
May 2016
#134
Kerry has to stay out of it since this is an inspector generals investigation. He really
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#13
Damn, I read that story 3 times and each time I read it that the report was leaked to Politico,
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#24
Yeah, right?! 83 pages, done. Released midweek. I'm thinking Kerry is going to have to step out
JudyM
May 2016
#27
I think both will take a "it is what it is" and neither condemn nor apologize for her behavior.
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#30
The State Department IG should be at the cameras. I think both Kerry and Obama are in Vietnam.
karynnj
May 2016
#53
Totally agree. Totally professional in all respects. As are most public servants.
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#31
What part of he handed it over to the SD IG did you miss? That is the sense in which it is said that
karynnj
May 2016
#64
The fact that you are so obtuse to how sad that state of affairs is - vexes the entire nation
laserhaas
May 2016
#11
Nothing criminal. Just sloppy. Oh dear. What are we to do now? I know. Let's go to the next scandal.
Laser102
May 2016
#16
Great defense for a president. "I wasn't criminal, just incompetent." (n/t)
thesquanderer
May 2016
#26
I am willing to bet that could be applied to almost every President at time or another
cstanleytech
May 2016
#76
She chose not to comply. That's not sloppiness, that's not accidental, that's on purpose.
panader0
May 2016
#40
I'm not so sure about the mens rea/scienter of this particular issue; but do concur with the
laserhaas
May 2016
#41
If that is the biggest concern, this is bigger than Benghazi! And that is Yooouuuuge!
L. Coyote
May 2016
#20
Still going through the motions. No crimes. No indictments. Sorry, 'Not Hillary' Party. nt
onehandle
May 2016
#21
Concur! - But we shouldn't have to buckle up - this crap should have been written off - already
laserhaas
May 2016
#56
You are embarrassing yourself, whether you know it or not. Drank too much kool-aid? Read the report.
JudyM
May 2016
#138
Why is Politico using the word "Review" instead of calling it what it is; an INVESTIGATION? nt
99th_Monkey
May 2016
#49
Hey, she may still skate by to the nomination, and get into the WH, by (whatever) type of election
laserhaas
May 2016
#57
It's exceedingly odd, after the FBI itself goes out of its way to scream "stop using 'review'"
99th_Monkey
May 2016
#61
Evidently, you don't know who I am - and how much my whistleblowing, against RICO Romney
laserhaas
May 2016
#65
I don't know about that. He's got issues, including misogny - that will be banging away at a woman
laserhaas
May 2016
#59
Why no mention that this kind of sloppy practice was a long-standing problem at the State Dept?
stopbush
May 2016
#52
On this item, I concur, this report could actually be a well thought out - Test the Waters dynamic
laserhaas
May 2016
#60
If it were anybody else, even Bill or Obama (much less Kerry) - this would NOT be okay
laserhaas
May 2016
#63
Nothing will happen because her practices were no worse than multiple Secretaries before her.
pnwmom
May 2016
#70
That is untrue. There has been no evidence that anything on her server was classified
pnwmom
May 2016
#96
I believe Clinton did not even have a state.gov account so explain what you mean by she used secure
hollowdweller
May 2016
#178
She used the SCIF system for classified emails. That was the only secure system
pnwmom
May 2016
#179
Neither Hillary nor Powell used a .gov account for non-classified. And both of them
pnwmom
May 2016
#95
You have a fundamental misunderstanding. Hillary, like Powell, used the secure SCIF system
pnwmom
May 2016
#133
That information was retroactively classified. And she could and did access the secure SCIF system.
pnwmom
May 2016
#139
No, it was not. The IG has already stated he found 4 e-mails that were classified at the time
Press Virginia
May 2016
#140
You keep making false assertions with zero evidence. She had the full authority to decide
pnwmom
May 2016
#148
As someone who worked for a contracter that built SCIFS, I can say without a doubt
Press Virginia
May 2016
#150
The contents of the Sid "Keep 'em Coming" Blumenthal emails were NSA documents
leveymg
May 2016
#156
Some people are going to be really surprised when she's actually charged with a crime
Press Virginia
May 2016
#159
To tell you the truth, I think a deal has already been reached. They've had since March 2015 to
leveymg
May 2016
#161
Do you really think she's going to give up? The one thing the Clinton's don't do
Press Virginia
May 2016
#162
This is a lot bigger than marital infidelity, and she has made many enemies, including at NSA
leveymg
May 2016
#163
It's the HRC defense. Sure Hillary had a nonsecure server in her basement
Press Virginia
May 2016
#116
"Did Not Comply"... "Chose Not To Cooperate"... Didn't she proclaim full/complete cooperation?
AzDar
May 2016
#75
Clinton’s actions were unlawful under either federal records preservation laws or criminal laws
Justice
May 2016
#149
The Aspens look like a forest, yet they're cloned from one tree, grown from the roots.
Octafish
May 2016
#185