Latest Breaking News

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)

88. you declaring it fiction fits your MO of extensive hollow declaration use

Reply to George II (Reply #74)

Thu May 12, 2016, 08:50 PM

May 2016

which appears to be your ONLY discernable strong suit that the laughing/rolling emoticon defense only validates

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

132 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Charity Aided Clinton Friends [View all] Halliburton May 2016 OP

bernie votes for lockheed funding because it gets bennies for his friends in vermont nt msongs May 2016 #1

Because he is a Senator from VERMONT ! penndragon69 May 2016 #3

The F-35, as abortive as it is, was a done deal regardless. Returns some MIC taxes back to state. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #103

And that has what to do with the Clinton charity? AtomicKitten May 2016 #4

they don't understand that there are rules for charities that cannot be transgressed. roguevalley May 2016 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten May 2016 #31

That's Neoliberalism 101. Beowulf May 2016 #106

More than the OP has to do with a Clinton charity. beastie boy May 2016 #101

It's a tangled web of money laundering. AtomicKitten May 2016 #102

And you base this generality on the article quoted? beastie boy May 2016 #108

Shhhh. AtomicKitten May 2016 #109

That's a very mature response. beastie boy May 2016 #111

Really? ThirdWayToTheHighway May 2016 #105

Really. beastie boy May 2016 #110

CGI is a program administered by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation which is a charitible Luminous Animal May 2016 #114

You are aware that a charity organization can have non-charitable units, no? beastie boy May 2016 #115

From the foundations own documents Luminous Animal May 2016 #116

And?... A non-charitable unit operting as part of the foundation. What does this prove? beastie boy May 2016 #117

You can't do that. A noncharitable wing cannot combine assets with a charitable wing. Luminous Animal May 2016 #118

Of course they can. They are not a wing, they are a subsidiary. beastie boy May 2016 #119

I've done non-profit bookkeeping & accounting for 30 years. A not for profit "wing" of a charitable Luminous Animal May 2016 #123

Boy, am I glad you are not my accountant! beastie boy May 2016 #124

Constituents is the word I believe you were looking for. frylock May 2016 #5

Oh c'mon now! Plucketeer May 2016 #16

I so hear his voice. LOL! Love this, Plucketeer roguevalley May 2016 #22

Thanks for the chuckle! dchill May 2016 #76

I'm done with the pissing contest tymorial May 2016 #6

Be careful LW1977 May 2016 #63

Let them tymorial May 2016 #125

Acting like adolescents is what keeps us feeling young LiberalArkie May 2016 #81

And *that* is the goal of that particular hit and run poster ... Nihil May 2016 #113

Every representative tries to get funding for things that will help his/her state. thesquanderer May 2016 #9

But, but, but truedelphi May 2016 #12

Really a totally different issue than possible misuse of charitable funds. Yo_Mama May 2016 #50

Only Republican corruption appears to bother many Clinton suppoorters Red Knight May 2016 #82

lol THATS your response? CarrieLynne May 2016 #89

"Bennies?" I think Julie Tauber McMahon was getting something entirely different Attorney in Texas May 2016 #122

Gee, thanks for bringing us more rw nonsense... BootinUp May 2016 #2

Hillary brought this to us. 840high May 2016 #17

Thank you for supporting a RW candidate, truedelphi May 2016 #26

+1000000 SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #65

I donated to Scott Kleeb & voted for US Senate, his wife runs a liberal NE group Omaha Steve May 2016 #53

This message was self-deleted by its author Cryptoad May 2016 #7

The media really is turning on her CoffeeCat May 2016 #8

At some type of Univ of Chicago event, Jon Stewart came out against Hillary! truedelphi May 2016 #13

He's right. 840high May 2016 #20

I heard him say that if one looked inside her it was debatable that a real person would be inside roguevalley May 2016 #24

Just wait, she may have a "conviction" pretty soon. tularetom May 2016 #42

Bwahahah! A priceless remark! n/t truedelphi May 2016 #48

from your mouth to God's ears NJCher May 2016 #54

DUzy!! MissDeeds May 2016 #59

Hehe. SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #67

The idea of Slick Willy back in the White House negotiating trade agreements, CrispyQ May 2016 #120

HA! Who is saying that? CoffeeCat May 2016 #121

Thanks for the update on the RWNJ attack on HRC Cryptoad May 2016 #10

but.. grasswire May 2016 #15

How much must they spent to be legal? Cryptoad May 2016 #19

they can't work as a non profit with for profit. Seriously. Its the only really big rule and roguevalley May 2016 #27

Clintons put Nixon to shame. 840high May 2016 #23

It's WJC-HRC, Inc with the subsidiary of CVC-Mezvinsky, LLC GoneOffShore May 2016 #64

Yes . I posted 840high May 2016 #69

Didn't his hedge company just go under, too? Kittycat May 2016 #130

The really troubling part of it all... RiverNoord May 2016 #57

and don't forget that they added a Canadian "charity"... grasswire May 2016 #62

Canada is where his friend and board member Giustra is from. Kittycat May 2016 #131

yes nt grasswire May 2016 #132

Opacity? senz May 2016 #91

Isn't there not more than a smidge of irony in how truedelphi May 2016 #18

u have yet to prove Cryptoad May 2016 #25

First of all, you are mis-using the word "sting" truedelphi May 2016 #32

Thats why it was in quotes Cryptoad May 2016 #33

I hear ya, truedelphi. He created the EPA roguevalley May 2016 #28

Nixon also had just enough integrity to resign Cassiopeia May 2016 #55

Imagine what her Wall Street speeches would reveal left-of-center2012 May 2016 #11

Hey, what's a charity for? nt thereismore May 2016 #14

WSJ is not a reliable source. This article explains-- Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go? LiberalFighter May 2016 #29

Yet even if this is true, truedelphi May 2016 #34

It may be FactCheck but sources were from Charity Navigator and Center for Effective Philanthropy LiberalFighter May 2016 #43

Charity Navigator has dropped the Clinton Foundation because of their odd "business model". panader0 May 2016 #93

It's not true. On 2013 filings, the most recent available ... AtomicKitten May 2016 #44

"Clinton Foundation-veritable clearinghouse for cronyism masquerading as a charity." Divernan May 2016 #104

"Facilitating" industrial parks/commercial infrastructure/luxury hotels Divernan May 2016 #96

Everyday there is something like laundering and other discrepancies going on..with bkkyosemite May 2016 #30

And today at Facebook page "Election Fraud: 2016" -- there is the headline that truedelphi May 2016 #36

de-certified hmmm bkkyosemite May 2016 #37

Big Q is,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #35

She is NOT the nominee! bkkyosemite May 2016 #38

I didnt say she was the nominee ,,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #39

I know what you said but it's been said over and over by HRC supporters here and you bkkyosemite May 2016 #40

Famous Old Wives' Proverb truedelphi May 2016 #41

I didn't say "presumptive",,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #45

She isn't the nominee yet, and certainly it is better for negative info/allegations to Yo_Mama May 2016 #52

"Why does DU allow right wing attacks"? Hmmm I wonder. They also allow FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #58

When one has to resort to personal attacks Cryptoad May 2016 #80

Your response is ironic considering you have so many "hides" due to personal attacks! FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #87

Why is every criticism of Clinton "right wing" Scootaloo May 2016 #77

Were the companies qualified and do quality work? Anything else is BS. Hoyt May 2016 #46

No Way! RiverNoord May 2016 #47

You'd have to get an invite to Davos to find out. GoneOffShore May 2016 #66

Ah, yes. RiverNoord May 2016 #86

They want to go good for the world creeksneakers2 May 2016 #98

They want oodles of money OwlinAZ May 2016 #128

In other news, water is still wet. Cassiopeia May 2016 #49

Hm... we both might be really bad builders of metaphors :-) RiverNoord May 2016 #61

I saw that. Cassiopeia May 2016 #70

Crying out for holy vengeance? RiverNoord May 2016 #90

Faux Clinton bashing..... George II May 2016 #51

I don't understand your choice of singers greiner3 May 2016 #60

Sonny ended up being a right-wing Congressman from Palm Springs Art_from_Ark May 2016 #73

You guys can find something negative about anyone. I guess you didn't see Cher in that video? George II May 2016 #75

that you can neither dispute nor refute stupidicus May 2016 #71

Dispute or refute fiction? George II May 2016 #74

you declaring it fiction fits your MO of extensive hollow declaration use stupidicus May 2016 #88

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #56

A GOP contract? MsInformed May 2016 #78

Can't get behind the paywall. GoneOffShore May 2016 #68

wholly unsurprising, like this stupidicus May 2016 #72

Does this mean Sanders should return the $10,000 contribution Hillary raised and donated to Thinkingabout May 2016 #79

k&R nt silvershadow May 2016 #83

It really seems like they ( Energy Pioneer Solutions Inc.) were doing good stuff MsInformed May 2016 #84

bookmarked leveymg May 2016 #85

Kick warrprayer May 2016 #92

And in other news.. Amimnoch May 2016 #94

$140M in - $9M out -- sign me up for that scam (um, "charity"), please! nt IdaBriggs May 2016 #95

Private jets/5star hotels/posh international soirees Divernan May 2016 #97

Perhaps we can see 30 years of tax form from all the candidates. fleabiscuit May 2016 #99

The Clinton Global Initiative is NOT a charity organization. beastie boy May 2016 #100

Saw this on the network news this morning... oh dear! nc4bo May 2016 #107

And a kick for this. GoneOffShore May 2016 #112

Wow interesting xloadiex May 2016 #126

She's every Republican's dream Democratic nominee. forest444 May 2016 #127

One degree of separation? trudyco May 2016 #129