Latest Breaking News

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)

80. When one has to resort to personal attacks

Reply to FailureToCommunicate (Reply #58)

Thu May 12, 2016, 08:21 PM

May 2016

means they have nothing to say! Its a Democratic Forum,,,,,, nobody should be allowed to post RWNJ attacks of any possible nominee of the Party, much less any likely nominee.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

132 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Charity Aided Clinton Friends [View all] Halliburton May 2016 OP

bernie votes for lockheed funding because it gets bennies for his friends in vermont nt msongs May 2016 #1

Because he is a Senator from VERMONT ! penndragon69 May 2016 #3

The F-35, as abortive as it is, was a done deal regardless. Returns some MIC taxes back to state. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #103

And that has what to do with the Clinton charity? AtomicKitten May 2016 #4

they don't understand that there are rules for charities that cannot be transgressed. roguevalley May 2016 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten May 2016 #31

That's Neoliberalism 101. Beowulf May 2016 #106

More than the OP has to do with a Clinton charity. beastie boy May 2016 #101

It's a tangled web of money laundering. AtomicKitten May 2016 #102

And you base this generality on the article quoted? beastie boy May 2016 #108

Shhhh. AtomicKitten May 2016 #109

That's a very mature response. beastie boy May 2016 #111

Really? ThirdWayToTheHighway May 2016 #105

Really. beastie boy May 2016 #110

CGI is a program administered by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation which is a charitible Luminous Animal May 2016 #114

You are aware that a charity organization can have non-charitable units, no? beastie boy May 2016 #115

From the foundations own documents Luminous Animal May 2016 #116

And?... A non-charitable unit operting as part of the foundation. What does this prove? beastie boy May 2016 #117

You can't do that. A noncharitable wing cannot combine assets with a charitable wing. Luminous Animal May 2016 #118

Of course they can. They are not a wing, they are a subsidiary. beastie boy May 2016 #119

I've done non-profit bookkeeping & accounting for 30 years. A not for profit "wing" of a charitable Luminous Animal May 2016 #123

Boy, am I glad you are not my accountant! beastie boy May 2016 #124

Constituents is the word I believe you were looking for. frylock May 2016 #5

Oh c'mon now! Plucketeer May 2016 #16

I so hear his voice. LOL! Love this, Plucketeer roguevalley May 2016 #22

Thanks for the chuckle! dchill May 2016 #76

I'm done with the pissing contest tymorial May 2016 #6

Be careful LW1977 May 2016 #63

Let them tymorial May 2016 #125

Acting like adolescents is what keeps us feeling young LiberalArkie May 2016 #81

And *that* is the goal of that particular hit and run poster ... Nihil May 2016 #113

Every representative tries to get funding for things that will help his/her state. thesquanderer May 2016 #9

But, but, but truedelphi May 2016 #12

Really a totally different issue than possible misuse of charitable funds. Yo_Mama May 2016 #50

Only Republican corruption appears to bother many Clinton suppoorters Red Knight May 2016 #82

lol THATS your response? CarrieLynne May 2016 #89

"Bennies?" I think Julie Tauber McMahon was getting something entirely different Attorney in Texas May 2016 #122

Gee, thanks for bringing us more rw nonsense... BootinUp May 2016 #2

Hillary brought this to us. 840high May 2016 #17

Thank you for supporting a RW candidate, truedelphi May 2016 #26

+1000000 SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #65

I donated to Scott Kleeb & voted for US Senate, his wife runs a liberal NE group Omaha Steve May 2016 #53

This message was self-deleted by its author Cryptoad May 2016 #7

The media really is turning on her CoffeeCat May 2016 #8

At some type of Univ of Chicago event, Jon Stewart came out against Hillary! truedelphi May 2016 #13

He's right. 840high May 2016 #20

I heard him say that if one looked inside her it was debatable that a real person would be inside roguevalley May 2016 #24

Just wait, she may have a "conviction" pretty soon. tularetom May 2016 #42

Bwahahah! A priceless remark! n/t truedelphi May 2016 #48

from your mouth to God's ears NJCher May 2016 #54

DUzy!! MissDeeds May 2016 #59

Hehe. SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #67

The idea of Slick Willy back in the White House negotiating trade agreements, CrispyQ May 2016 #120

HA! Who is saying that? CoffeeCat May 2016 #121

Thanks for the update on the RWNJ attack on HRC Cryptoad May 2016 #10

but.. grasswire May 2016 #15

How much must they spent to be legal? Cryptoad May 2016 #19

they can't work as a non profit with for profit. Seriously. Its the only really big rule and roguevalley May 2016 #27

Clintons put Nixon to shame. 840high May 2016 #23

It's WJC-HRC, Inc with the subsidiary of CVC-Mezvinsky, LLC GoneOffShore May 2016 #64

Yes . I posted 840high May 2016 #69

Didn't his hedge company just go under, too? Kittycat May 2016 #130

The really troubling part of it all... RiverNoord May 2016 #57

and don't forget that they added a Canadian "charity"... grasswire May 2016 #62

Canada is where his friend and board member Giustra is from. Kittycat May 2016 #131

yes nt grasswire May 2016 #132

Opacity? senz May 2016 #91

Isn't there not more than a smidge of irony in how truedelphi May 2016 #18

u have yet to prove Cryptoad May 2016 #25

First of all, you are mis-using the word "sting" truedelphi May 2016 #32

Thats why it was in quotes Cryptoad May 2016 #33

I hear ya, truedelphi. He created the EPA roguevalley May 2016 #28

Nixon also had just enough integrity to resign Cassiopeia May 2016 #55

Imagine what her Wall Street speeches would reveal left-of-center2012 May 2016 #11

Hey, what's a charity for? nt thereismore May 2016 #14

WSJ is not a reliable source. This article explains-- Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go? LiberalFighter May 2016 #29

Yet even if this is true, truedelphi May 2016 #34

It may be FactCheck but sources were from Charity Navigator and Center for Effective Philanthropy LiberalFighter May 2016 #43

Charity Navigator has dropped the Clinton Foundation because of their odd "business model". panader0 May 2016 #93

It's not true. On 2013 filings, the most recent available ... AtomicKitten May 2016 #44

"Clinton Foundation-veritable clearinghouse for cronyism masquerading as a charity." Divernan May 2016 #104

"Facilitating" industrial parks/commercial infrastructure/luxury hotels Divernan May 2016 #96

Everyday there is something like laundering and other discrepancies going on..with bkkyosemite May 2016 #30

And today at Facebook page "Election Fraud: 2016" -- there is the headline that truedelphi May 2016 #36

de-certified hmmm bkkyosemite May 2016 #37

Big Q is,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #35

She is NOT the nominee! bkkyosemite May 2016 #38

I didnt say she was the nominee ,,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #39

I know what you said but it's been said over and over by HRC supporters here and you bkkyosemite May 2016 #40

Famous Old Wives' Proverb truedelphi May 2016 #41

I didn't say "presumptive",,,,, Cryptoad May 2016 #45

She isn't the nominee yet, and certainly it is better for negative info/allegations to Yo_Mama May 2016 #52

"Why does DU allow right wing attacks"? Hmmm I wonder. They also allow FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #58

When one has to resort to personal attacks Cryptoad May 2016 #80

Your response is ironic considering you have so many "hides" due to personal attacks! FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #87

Why is every criticism of Clinton "right wing" Scootaloo May 2016 #77

Were the companies qualified and do quality work? Anything else is BS. Hoyt May 2016 #46

No Way! RiverNoord May 2016 #47

You'd have to get an invite to Davos to find out. GoneOffShore May 2016 #66

Ah, yes. RiverNoord May 2016 #86

They want to go good for the world creeksneakers2 May 2016 #98

They want oodles of money OwlinAZ May 2016 #128

In other news, water is still wet. Cassiopeia May 2016 #49

Hm... we both might be really bad builders of metaphors :-) RiverNoord May 2016 #61

I saw that. Cassiopeia May 2016 #70

Crying out for holy vengeance? RiverNoord May 2016 #90

Faux Clinton bashing..... George II May 2016 #51

I don't understand your choice of singers greiner3 May 2016 #60

Sonny ended up being a right-wing Congressman from Palm Springs Art_from_Ark May 2016 #73

You guys can find something negative about anyone. I guess you didn't see Cher in that video? George II May 2016 #75

that you can neither dispute nor refute stupidicus May 2016 #71

Dispute or refute fiction? George II May 2016 #74

you declaring it fiction fits your MO of extensive hollow declaration use stupidicus May 2016 #88

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #56

A GOP contract? MsInformed May 2016 #78

Can't get behind the paywall. GoneOffShore May 2016 #68

wholly unsurprising, like this stupidicus May 2016 #72

Does this mean Sanders should return the $10,000 contribution Hillary raised and donated to Thinkingabout May 2016 #79

k&R nt silvershadow May 2016 #83

It really seems like they ( Energy Pioneer Solutions Inc.) were doing good stuff MsInformed May 2016 #84

bookmarked leveymg May 2016 #85

Kick warrprayer May 2016 #92

And in other news.. Amimnoch May 2016 #94

$140M in - $9M out -- sign me up for that scam (um, "charity"), please! nt IdaBriggs May 2016 #95

Private jets/5star hotels/posh international soirees Divernan May 2016 #97

Perhaps we can see 30 years of tax form from all the candidates. fleabiscuit May 2016 #99

The Clinton Global Initiative is NOT a charity organization. beastie boy May 2016 #100

Saw this on the network news this morning... oh dear! nc4bo May 2016 #107

And a kick for this. GoneOffShore May 2016 #112

Wow interesting xloadiex May 2016 #126

She's every Republican's dream Democratic nominee. forest444 May 2016 #127

One degree of separation? trudyco May 2016 #129