Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
40. please fund candidates directly
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:59 AM
Apr 2016

We learned the hard way that sending money to the county committee did not always result in funds going to the candidates.

Wouldn't that be something! packman Apr 2016 #1
Not to mention, if that happens, a left-leaning Supreme Court. ::swoon:: NT Grown2Hate Apr 2016 #113
Florida will not go Hillary, nor will the dem senate candidate win. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #2
That is true. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #7
Clinton or Sanders would have a chance of winning Florida against Trump Democat Apr 2016 #17
Democrats are unwilling to fight, then we could lose. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #44
Dems will win the GE but nothing will change all that much unless Sanders is the candidate bjobotts Apr 2016 #50
Absolutely sad and absolutely true Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #119
overcoming all the cheating in FL means twice as many must vote. bjobotts Apr 2016 #48
I doubt that the actual numbers reflect your sentiment. beastie boy Apr 2016 #8
Okay... Buddyblazon Apr 2016 #114
It's as if you didn't read my post. beastie boy Apr 2016 #116
How will it go with Bernie at the top of the ticket? Vincardog Apr 2016 #15
So you say anigbrowl Apr 2016 #103
Especially if it's Grayson Reter Apr 2016 #112
Taking down Grassley and McCain would certainly make for extra cherries on an election sundae. LonePirate Apr 2016 #3
Grassley would be a big one to take down NewJeffCT Apr 2016 #22
Funding downticket candidates won't do shit if people don't vote. Dawgs Apr 2016 #4
Funding downticket candidates doesn't mean paying their rent. beastie boy Apr 2016 #10
My point is that the Democrats WON'T do well on with downticket candidates with her as the nominee. Dawgs Apr 2016 #72
I wish I could share your pessimism. beastie boy Apr 2016 #75
I respectfully disagree. HeartoftheMidwest Apr 2016 #85
Said it much better than I did. Dawgs Apr 2016 #89
Her approval numbers to many are much more than right wing attacks. Dawgs Apr 2016 #88
Most admired woman for the record 20th time John K Apr 2016 #97
I wonder if the down ticket may have reverse coat tails for the top. gordianot Apr 2016 #19
What unliked, establishment candidate was atop the ballot in 2014? LonePirate Apr 2016 #41
The point is that you have to give people a reason to vote. Dawgs Apr 2016 #61
You're making excuses for bad behavior. Voting for the best candidate is always a reason to vote. LonePirate Apr 2016 #66
Ah, that's where you are missing the point. Dawgs Apr 2016 #70
I'm missing nothing. Their laziness/refusal to educate themselves has caused our dysfunction. LonePirate Apr 2016 #73
Understand, you're talking about something completely different now. Dawgs Apr 2016 #74
They already have a reason to vote. They simply refuse it while others prefer scapegoating for them. LonePirate Apr 2016 #76
Fine, what's "the reason"? n/t Dawgs Apr 2016 #81
To avoid SC justices like Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts. tblue37 Apr 2016 #83
Those are NOT reasons to vote FOR someone or something. Dawgs Apr 2016 #86
Well women and minorities and immigrants and Muslims have a reason, but Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #78
Those are reasons to vote AGAINST someone or something. Dawgs Apr 2016 #80
In the grown up world, that is often our only option. But as adults we have Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #82
Don't you mean, 'AS A DEMOCRAT, that is often our only option'? Dawgs Apr 2016 #87
Turn the Senate blue again pandr32 Apr 2016 #5
Voting for Third Way Democrats won't get any progressive legislation passed. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #9
That is such myopic garbage sharp_stick Apr 2016 #11
The Corporatist Dems are the ones making "the parties are the same" true. Don't blame the messenger Vincardog Apr 2016 #16
So true. Go, Bernie, go! GreenPartyVoter Apr 2016 #28
That's a very creative allegation LanternWaste Apr 2016 #69
Watching the DLC and Democratic sellouts for 30 years is is "faith-based belief system" right! What Vincardog Apr 2016 #106
FTFY. Chan790 Apr 2016 #29
Keep telling yourself that sharp_stick Apr 2016 #32
...you mean like Hillary? n/t Chan790 Apr 2016 #33
What a load of horseshit sharp_stick Apr 2016 #34
They're both fully owned by Wall St. and the brothers Koch. Chan790 Apr 2016 #35
And both Uber-hawkish NeoCons. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #68
+1 Unicorn Apr 2016 #90
Wrong... gregcrawford Apr 2016 #62
The so called "third way Democrats" are actually the mainstream and the majority of the party. beastie boy Apr 2016 #65
Pretty sure they called themselves that... gregcrawford Apr 2016 #95
Just so there's no confusion Bradical79 Apr 2016 #100
I am aware of the think tank, and they have as much to do with the mainstream Democrats as beastie boy Apr 2016 #105
Your post is not true in a few different ways Bradical79 Apr 2016 #109
Just because the term "Third Way" has been used before, doesn't mean it hasn't been co-opted by beastie boy Apr 2016 #111
Again, you are wrong Bradical79 Apr 2016 #115
If you say so. beastie boy Apr 2016 #118
No kidding Stuckinthebush Apr 2016 #84
Republicans and Democrats are the same? Democat Apr 2016 #18
Same Iraq war Hillary voted for? HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #23
The one Bernie turned right around and voted to fully fund pandr32 Apr 2016 #92
So you want a war zalinda Apr 2016 #98
+1 snort Apr 2016 #107
Many states are lucky to field a single Dem candidate for Senate, let alone more than one. LonePirate Apr 2016 #37
+1, out with 3rd way trash harun Apr 2016 #38
Sure, like Democrats haven't been working to do progressive things for decades. pandr32 Apr 2016 #91
The have only been working to do SOCIALLY progressive things zalinda Apr 2016 #99
We Can't Pander To Wall Street And Take Back The Senate At The Same Time - Sorry scottie55 Apr 2016 #6
Sorry, but if we don't take back the Senate, we guarantee the perpetuation beastie boy Apr 2016 #14
The argument is nonsensical. Chan790 Apr 2016 #31
If you are into mutilation, this analogy would be more accurate: beastie boy Apr 2016 #36
No...it's more like being garrotted or a beheading. Chan790 Apr 2016 #39
It's irrational posts like this one which make me yearn for Skinner to clean up DU. LonePirate Apr 2016 #42
Good for you. Chan790 Apr 2016 #47
So you're voting Trump or third party in November? LonePirate Apr 2016 #51
Nope. Chan790 Apr 2016 #52
So, you're helping to elect Trump. Thanks for clearing that up for us. LonePirate Apr 2016 #56
If you say so. Chan790 Apr 2016 #59
Do you seriously see no difference between President Clinton and President Trump? beastie boy Apr 2016 #45
...as opposed to be being strangled with the nomination of fake Democrats? Chan790 Apr 2016 #49
Thankfully, you do not decide who is a real Democrat and who isn't. beastie boy Apr 2016 #53
But I do get to decide who I don't consider a Democrat. :) Chan790 Apr 2016 #58
You absolutely get to decide whether you want to cut your nose despite your face! beastie boy Apr 2016 #60
I'm voting downticket regardless... Chan790 Apr 2016 #63
Mazel tov! beastie boy Apr 2016 #64
If Republicans keep the senate, then those billionaires win Democat Apr 2016 #20
The billionaires know the odds Plucketeer Apr 2016 #25
I hate Grassley. stopbush Apr 2016 #12
If Grassley said the sky's blue Plucketeer Apr 2016 #26
The U.S. Senate's average IQ will rise 10% if Patty wins. /nt NCjack Apr 2016 #13
A Trump Nomination + SCOTUS Obstructionism = fred v Apr 2016 #21
There is no problem with the US or our people that traditional conservative ideas can now remedy hollowdweller Apr 2016 #24
Who's countin' the votes? curiouso Apr 2016 #27
Payback's a Mitch Blue Owl Apr 2016 #30
please fund candidates directly oldandhappy Apr 2016 #40
This analysis piece doesn't belong in LBN. PSPS Apr 2016 #43
This would be fabulous! redstatebluegirl Apr 2016 #46
The proof is in the pudding houston16revival Apr 2016 #54
Thank you Hillary for all those fund raisers you have attended. Fla Dem Apr 2016 #55
And thanks for lining your pockets with corporate money. snort Apr 2016 #108
What better argument to go with the candidate who has positive coattails (Sanders)? Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #57
^^THIS^^ n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #67
GOOD NEWS libodem Apr 2016 #71
No problem "turtleman" will just pull his head back into his... usaf-vet Apr 2016 #77
Beating GrASSley would put a huge smile Funtatlaguy Apr 2016 #79
Maybe if Obama was running. Calista241 Apr 2016 #93
Thank you Soxfan58 Apr 2016 #94
And why shouldn't they? Republicans are terrible at governing. ffr Apr 2016 #96
but I heard that the republicans have a god on their side Angry Dragon Apr 2016 #101
Getting the Senate to a filibuster proof would be a great start. Hillary has raised money to fund Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #102
When you stand for nothing, not surprising you have nothing to defend. Justice Apr 2016 #104
snake in the Grassley needs to go#! dicksmc3 Apr 2016 #110
Good news GOPblows431 Apr 2016 #117
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Republican Senate Maj...»Reply #40