Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
4. Lot of irrelevant information there, Nick.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 07:57 PM
Jun 2012

What you wrote is an attempt to justify nuclear (which you strongly support) and it has nothing to do with the actual problem.

First, Noda is claiming they need to restart 2 reactors, not 48GW worth.

Second, it didn't take Germany 30 years to install their renewable base - they started in earnest only 14 years ago concentrating on wind, and most of the capacity has been installed in the last 5.

As for solar, of the 25GW in place, they installed 7.5GW in 2011 alone, and are on track to add another 8GW this year.

They want to restart the nuclear plants to set a precedent allowing them to restart most if not all of their fleet of reactors. Their 'nuclear village' simply doesn't want to take the financial loss, no matter the risk to the rest of the country. It has dick-all to do with actual necessity, maintaining the quality of life or national security.


Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Japan’s Prime Minister Se...»Reply #4