Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progressoid

(49,917 posts)
63. Yep. Moderate usually means the little guy gets screwed.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 02:08 PM
Mar 2016

Would like to know what his stance is on anti-trust law. Apparently he taught it and wrote a book about it.

I'm a bit surprised at that. I thought he'd nominate the person that was confirmed 97-0. PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #1
Thought so houston16revival Mar 2016 #2
Let's hope that President Obama now Nominates Srinivasan to Chief Justice AND Ketanji Brown Jackson Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #3
He probably can't do that FBaggins Mar 2016 #17
The Chief Judge is not nominated by the President. former9thward Mar 2016 #21
Noted, thank you for the clarification. Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #23
Unless you are Shrub Rosco T. Mar 2016 #25
SCOTUS is different from the federal bench in that respect. Chan790 Mar 2016 #42
Roberts joined the court and soon became the Chief Justice karynnj Mar 2016 #26
No and no. former9thward Mar 2016 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author Reter Mar 2016 #72
Let me add so that I don't have to edit my original OP. Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #4
Break that down for me. apnu Mar 2016 #6
In the long scheme of things houston16revival Mar 2016 #8
Very simple iandhr Mar 2016 #9
It just cost them the Senate majority. Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #12
The Senate majority was lost before Scalia died, simple demographics. L. Coyote Mar 2016 #20
I think the presumption is that the Republicans won't hold hearings and it will cost them PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #13
Because the varies republican senators painted themselves into a corner and point blank said cstanleytech Mar 2016 #14
It might force them to hold hearings The Green Manalishi Mar 2016 #19
From wiki / BTW please republicans try to block this guy Botany Mar 2016 #5
That's quite the resume. Arkana Mar 2016 #38
check ... salinsky Mar 2016 #7
Exactly Sunsky Mar 2016 #11
Yes, indeed. potone Mar 2016 #15
unless this is exactly what the GOP wanted all along Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #27
You haven't been paying attention ... salinsky Mar 2016 #43
In that case, we still win. Chan790 Mar 2016 #47
Exactly billhicks76 Mar 2016 #64
I'm not so sure... beac Mar 2016 #40
Might not be the number one choice? Babel_17 Mar 2016 #10
If Republicans don't approve this centrist houston16revival Mar 2016 #16
Trump would almost certainly nominate his sister. Chan790 Mar 2016 #49
Live video mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2016 #18
Let's all cheer a moderate rather than a Progressive SHRED Mar 2016 #22
Right? CrispyQ Mar 2016 #34
They're fine with the status quo. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #36
A moderate would still be an improvement considering its a replacement for Scalia cstanleytech Mar 2016 #48
+1 Myrina Mar 2016 #53
It's called a tactical move ... salinsky Mar 2016 #58
Obama Playing Chess Argument Again? billhicks76 Mar 2016 #65
Especially since it won't do ANYTHING to the GOP Doctor_J Mar 2016 #61
Yep. Moderate usually means the little guy gets screwed. progressoid Mar 2016 #63
If he isnt as extreme as Scalia its a step in the right direction imo. cstanleytech Mar 2016 #69
a step in the RIGHT directon is the problem Skittles Mar 2016 #73
If the nominee was someone like Janice Rogers Brown yes, it would be to the right cstanleytech Mar 2016 #74
Watching Judge Garland's speech now: a very good nominee The Blue Flower Mar 2016 #24
Could it be that... Else You Are Mad Mar 2016 #28
Obama had to know Garland's gun record would not shift the GOP stance at all Blasphemer Mar 2016 #29
Well he did in his previous picks. Two women iandhr Mar 2016 #30
Right... I think he would have continued making similar picks... nt Blasphemer Mar 2016 #31
Well the SCOTUS is the only branch of the US government with no WASPS. iandhr Mar 2016 #33
Senate Republicans houston16revival Mar 2016 #32
And oil wells and strip mines Punx Mar 2016 #51
This is a good pick Johnny2X2X Mar 2016 #35
And the court is still more liberal than it was with Scalia on the bench. Arkana Mar 2016 #39
Please proceed, Senator Hatch! yellowcanine Mar 2016 #37
Hatch has already said ... salinsky Mar 2016 #41
I Can't Believe RobinA Mar 2016 #44
Republicans nominate sulphurdunn Mar 2016 #45
Sacrificial lamb Crepuscular Mar 2016 #46
Obama disappoints again (and again). lark Mar 2016 #50
Agreed billhicks76 Mar 2016 #66
Goody, another old white guy from Harvard ... Myrina Mar 2016 #52
dem pundits, leaders should make hay out of this and the 7 years of wiggs Mar 2016 #54
Excellent choice, Garland is "one of the most respected jurists in the country". Sunlei Mar 2016 #55
And then this... SHRED Mar 2016 #57
Obama: salinsky Mar 2016 #56
Another old, white, conservative male on the court! Woo-hoo! Doctor_J Mar 2016 #59
If Orrin Hatch likes him that's good enough for me! Doctor_J Mar 2016 #60
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #62
Hillary And Orin Hatch billhicks76 Mar 2016 #67
Ugh, not progressive enough. Odin2005 Mar 2016 #70
Never heard of him. romanic Mar 2016 #71
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: Obama to Nomina...»Reply #63