Latest Breaking News

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)

128. Chicago Tribune mirrors the article

Reply to leveymg (Original post)

Tue Feb 23, 2016, 06:05 PM

Feb 2016

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-hillary-clinton-email-20160223-story.html

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

185 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. judge orders discovery to go forward over Clinton’s private email system [View all] leveymg Feb 2016 OP

What is the SAFEST thing to do for November's election? Herman4747 Feb 2016 #1

nothing strange going on and who is un-electable saturnsring Feb 2016 #2

HRC is unelectable. Kittycat Feb 2016 #6

what law has she broken? saturnsring Feb 2016 #8

I guess we will see, but she appears corrupt Kittycat Feb 2016 #10

means i guess we'll just keep digging til we find something if anything saturnsring Feb 2016 #13

I don't need to dig, I can read. Kittycat Feb 2016 #22

Yes they will. AND, they will pull the trigger after it too late to make any changes and Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #47

Yep! Duval Feb 2016 #53

it will never be too late to make changes. There's always the write-in option. nt grasswire Feb 2016 #59

good god. If they have her in herings and or court in NOvember, it would be a landslide for Trump Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #63

Great sig rnk6670 Feb 2016 #147

thank you grasswire Feb 2016 #157

And the only thing we have is a hollow "I told you so". Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #62

Whitewater and Vince Foster. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #54

This is the real bitch about it maindawg Feb 2016 #125

Investigating the Crap out of Her? LeFleur1 Feb 2016 #156

She's already her own worst enemy, R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #166

Which lies? TipTok Feb 2016 #182

And certainly... Plucketeer Feb 2016 #105

Says Judicial Watch. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #58

She Appears Corrupt itcfish Feb 2016 #78

Taking money from lobbyists Kittycat Feb 2016 #88

The heck with probable cause then, she appears corrupt! yellowcanine Feb 2016 #181

It's an election, not a court of law. jeff47 Feb 2016 #12

my reply was appropriate for the post saturnsring Feb 2016 #16

No, your reply attempted to redefine "unelectable" as only applying if convicted. jeff47 Feb 2016 #19

so no laws broken you just dont like how she handled it saturnsring Feb 2016 #24

:facepalm: jeff47 Feb 2016 #26

The Hillies are just going to flip and flop: R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #69

Earth to Saturn, Earth to Saturn - Come in, Saturn! Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #77

What makes you think no laws were broken? Why did the Judge grant discovery? leveymg Feb 2016 #80

Is FOIA a law? 6chars Feb 2016 #104

Of course FOIA is a law. leveymg Feb 2016 #113

One aspect is very easy. Do you believe in open government? Rilgin Feb 2016 #163

The FBI is investigating her for Espionage Act Sec. 793 violations. This is a separate case leveymg Feb 2016 #17

potential saturnsring Feb 2016 #133

The legal standard is probable cause, not potential. leveymg Feb 2016 #145

Perhaps she didn't break any laws, I guess we'll find out… tex-wyo-dem Feb 2016 #112

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #135

these RegexReader Feb 2016 #183

1st off she's not convicted of anything meaning innocent. secondly the feds are not looking at saturnsring Feb 2016 #184

Have you actually read any of it? complain jane Feb 2016 #122

Polls show Sanders beating the GOP front runners. Point is moot. 7962 Feb 2016 #30

You must not read DU much. Bernie is much more electable. Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #56

LOL you think they can't find something? treestar Feb 2016 #127

Yeah...Bernie is corrupt. Scandals just falling off trees. Not. libdem4life Feb 2016 #134

yes there will be something about Bernie they can use treestar Feb 2016 #154

They have new issues...and it's way past Whitewater or Benghazi. She's not been vetted libdem4life Feb 2016 #155

Being deposed does not mean there is automatically something wrong and it means a civil suit treestar Feb 2016 #158

Uh huh. Right. OK, then. libdem4life Feb 2016 #159

lol I made a point treestar Feb 2016 #160

Right. I couldn't find a point. Just a recitation of memes. libdem4life Feb 2016 #162

Button up your overcoat before leaving the house! Major Hogwash Feb 2016 #148

On October 3, 1984, Judge Sullivan was appointed by President Ronald Reagan saturnsring Feb 2016 #3

You left one more piece of info out. Wilms Feb 2016 #11

That's correct. Bill Clinton appointed him as US District Judge for DC leveymg Feb 2016 #20

LOVE IT! This Judge appointed by President Bill Clinton Divernan Feb 2016 #28

Notice how easy it is to totally change the message without lying? 7962 Feb 2016 #34

I go through that all day around here. Wilms Feb 2016 #37

deceit by omission dana_b Feb 2016 #60

what law has been broken by omitting important info?? R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #73

. tk2kewl Feb 2016 #61

Awesome! Wilms Feb 2016 #71

LOL tk2kewl Feb 2016 #72

Of course she did farleftlib Feb 2016 #4

"They Write Their Own Rules" gordyfl Feb 2016 #57

it's not the "top secret" stuff that's problematic. it's the Clinton Foundation pay-to-play nashville_brook Feb 2016 #5

^^ this ^^ Kittycat Feb 2016 #9

It doesn't have to be either-or. jeff47 Feb 2016 #14

good point. nashville_brook Feb 2016 #23

Exactly! How can "loyal Democrats" NOT be concerned re: SoS<>Clinton Foundation tomfoolery? 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #15

She has so many legal and ethical problems, any one could sink her and probably already has. leveymg Feb 2016 #21

appreciate your input here today. grasswire Feb 2016 #64

Thank you. leveymg Feb 2016 #74

When the Bushes used private email, DU was unanimous in opposition to it. arcane1 Feb 2016 #32

same with Rick Scott here in Florida. nashville_brook Feb 2016 #116

The braiding of personal enrichment, CGI donors, State Dept. schedules and HRC campaign donors... modestybl Feb 2016 #131

She's a ticking time bomb... AzDar Feb 2016 #7

That's the fourth probe into this mess Jarqui Feb 2016 #18

discovery will be fun. during the campaign? yes, discovery will be very fun. nashville_brook Feb 2016 #25

Dog knows what snarky comments are in her personal emails. Divernan Feb 2016 #39

yikes. she said that half of the emails. nashville_brook Feb 2016 #115

They can't preemptively pardon for the very reasons you say Jarqui Feb 2016 #48

you can bet that EVERY registered Republican voter despises her. grasswire Feb 2016 #81

Going Going Hopefully Gone Soon. Politicalboi Feb 2016 #27

Only a matter of time until the shoe drops. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #29

Using her SOS position to approve huge weapons deals to Clinton Found. "donors" Divernan Feb 2016 #33

Yep. Pay to play. A long-standing Clinton tradition. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #44

I soooo hope I'm the one that gets to post the LBN that she has been indicted. I'll leave the Purveyor Feb 2016 #31

You SHOULD be right, but I wouldnt hold my breath. nt 7962 Feb 2016 #41

LOL. Unless it happens soon I probably won't be posting here at all. Rapture and all, you know. nt Purveyor Feb 2016 #45

HAAA! 7962 Feb 2016 #76

side note dana_b Feb 2016 #68

Me too! Hydra Feb 2016 #142

You should hope to be so fast. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #84

that day will be a relief for the Democratic Party. grasswire Feb 2016 #94

Drip/drip/drip becoming deluge/deluge/deluge! Divernan Feb 2016 #35

Sullivan, btw, is a Bill Clinton appointee. nt magical thyme Feb 2016 #36

they did all this thinking they wouldn't have a primary challenge: they could weather MisterP Feb 2016 #38

I despise "we can't hurt the candidate" arguments. winter is coming Feb 2016 #119

yeah, especially not after the family's been bought out by Diageo MisterP Feb 2016 #132

This is a complete embarrassment for the Democratic Party. TheLogicalSong Feb 2016 #40

Oh Please! Outside the DU bizzarro world, no one cares about this except Rethuglicans leftofcool Feb 2016 #43

Outside the DU bizzarro world, I've yet to meet a single soul that proclaims support for hillary. Purveyor Feb 2016 #51

I know one, and she has no idea what Hillary does for a living Hydra Feb 2016 #143

For someone who thinks so little of this place, you sure spend a lot of time here lately leveymg Feb 2016 #52

some say that she is running precisely to avoid indictment.. grasswire Feb 2016 #90

May have that perverse effect. What does that say about her character? leveymg Feb 2016 #99

hmmmm grasswire Feb 2016 #101

No doubt, the victimization part is tactical. leveymg Feb 2016 #107

some say that she is running precisely to avoid indictment.. Angel Martin Feb 2016 #139

Wrong you are, again, as usual. Cobalt Violet Feb 2016 #83

looked at any social media lately? nt grasswire Feb 2016 #92

No. That's what Republicans want it to be treestar Feb 2016 #126

I'm glad that if Clinton testifies she won't need to R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #42

:::snort:::: nt grasswire Feb 2016 #87

They're still going with this "Top Secret" tripe vdogg Feb 2016 #46

Were you to have paid attention, you would have realized that the law is very clear on this. Maedhros Feb 2016 #55

Umm vdogg Feb 2016 #65

Read subsections (e) and (f) of Sec. 793 of the Espionage Act. Neither require intent. Both felonies leveymg Feb 2016 #85

It doesn't matter madville Feb 2016 #82

As someone who knows angrychair Feb 2016 #111

Wait, I'm confused vdogg Feb 2016 #49

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #137

And the Clinton haters and their freeper pals now Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #50

Perhaps we all want 840high Feb 2016 #66

As if Judicial Watch is interested in the truth. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #89

It is not Judicial Watch that will determine truth. grasswire Feb 2016 #96

If you love the Democratic Party more than HRC, pay attention to what's about to happen. leveymg Feb 2016 #67

we're voting our conscience dana_b Feb 2016 #75

This message was self-deleted by its author R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #100

?? dana_b Feb 2016 #103

Deleted. I was reading more than one post and replied R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2016 #108

perhaps all we want is an uncorrupted candidate. grasswire Feb 2016 #86

See post #89. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #93

Well, there's really a very easy way to prevent things like this happening... Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #152

What's New and why it matters doxyluv13 Feb 2016 #70

K&R Many thanks for this OP leveymg. bobthedrummer Feb 2016 #79

Glad I was here to catch it today. leveymg Feb 2016 #91

If this really was a right wing conspiracy, JoeyT Feb 2016 #95

It'd be quite a right-wing conspiracy to get a Clinton appointee to agree to this jfern Feb 2016 #140

Bernie may not give a damn about her email, but Trump will pound this, and if there is any cover up EndElectoral Feb 2016 #97

It's a fucking time bomb and it's not going away Arazi Feb 2016 #98

Yep, Matthew28 Feb 2016 #106

I have not yet seen anything to get worked up over concerning her e-mails passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #102

Read them here: complain jane Feb 2016 #123

“There has been a constant drip, drip, drip..." randome Feb 2016 #109

The judge is a Bill Clinton appointment - so the partisan smear doesn't work eom Arazi Feb 2016 #110

Ohhhh NO,,, EMAILS,,,,, Oh the horror of it all! Cryptoad Feb 2016 #114

Oh good god ... this again? NurseJackie Feb 2016 #117

Ouchy! Nominate Hillary and get Trump in the WH. Helen Borg Feb 2016 #118

Trump has already said he'd prosecute her if elected Calista241 Feb 2016 #120

Benghazi!! Vince Foster!! Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #121

You do drive-by posts very well Gore1FL Feb 2016 #161

Aww, aren't you funny. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #164

Based on the apparent desire to derail the thread by saying provoking things I'd say you are. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #165

This is DU and I am allowed to respond. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #167

I am allowed to respond too. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #168

You are actually trolling me. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #169

No. I am actually replying to your posts and continuing a topic. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #170

Believe me I am not looking for any of your posts. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #171

The easiest way to do that is to be civil. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #172

I will continue to use sarcasm and blunt language when I sense republican Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #173

I am sorry for assuming you had more to offer. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #175

Put me on ignore then. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #177

Nope. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #178

Good for you. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #179

I only make criticisms from the left so it won;t be necessary. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #185

So much for not being illegal d_legendary1 Feb 2016 #124

Chicago Tribune mirrors the article Babel_17 Feb 2016 #128

Why do such a thing? boobooday Feb 2016 #129

Can we ask this judge to do something about the damn Wall Street speech transcripts? Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #130

This country, I swear. JackRiddler Feb 2016 #136

My Main Man Jack, I think you may have something there (Think Snowden) mrdmk Feb 2016 #138

LOL ! thanks ! nt Angel Martin Feb 2016 #141

Objectively, our country is way off the rails Hydra Feb 2016 #144

Even if HRC loses, the Clintons laugh all the way to the (Big) Bank(s) Divernan Feb 2016 #146

Yeah, but she broke the rulez. Major Hogwash Feb 2016 #149

Kicking nt LiberalElite Feb 2016 #150

I think we're past drips and onto a nervous trickle by now. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #151

Addressing emails once again Clinton is not being truthful dr60omg Feb 2016 #153

Yeah because cell phones are sooo big Bjornsdotter Feb 2016 #176

In 2008 when the news broke about kiva Feb 2016 #174

We're waiting. n/t bobthedrummer Feb 2016 #180