Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
31. Sad. "We know that their primary goal is not anybody’s food security but their own bottom line."
Mon May 28, 2012, 07:04 PM
May 2012
http://www.alternet.org/environment/155559/how_the_us_sold_africa_to_multinationals_like_monsanto,_cargill,_dupont,_pepsico_and_others_?page=entire

AlterNet / By Jill Richardson

How the US Sold Africa to Multinationals Like Monsanto, Cargill, DuPont, PepsiCo and Others


The G8 scheme does nothing to address the problems that are at the core of hunger and malnutrition but will serve only to further poverty and inequality...


http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/05/21-5

Published on Monday, May 21, 2012 by Common Dreams

Don’t Put Monsanto in Charge of Ending Hunger in Africa

by Yifat Susskind


This past weekend, President Obama hid out from protesters at Camp David. He was hosting the leaders of the world’s eight wealthiest economies, known as the G8. As they readied to meet, on Friday, Obama put forward his New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition.

This occasion gave Rajiv Shah, the administrator of the US Agency for International Development, the chance to make an astonishing statement:
“We are never going to end hunger in Africa without private investment. There are things that only companies can do, like building silos for storage and developing seeds and fertilizers.”

That’s news to millions of women farmers in Africa. Their harvests feed their families and generate income that sustains local economies. For generations, they have been doing just those things: storing their harvests, protecting and developing seeds, using natural fertilizers.

Smallholder women farmers save and exchange seeds that help keep local crops viable. They demonstrate how to adapt to climate change by adjusting planting cycles, experimenting with new drought-resistant crops and more. They produce crucial food supplies using the small-scale, organic methods that are increasingly recognized as vital to the health of the planet—and everyone who lives on it.

There are differences, of course. Unlike big companies, small-scale women farmers do not grab millions of acres of land for monoculture plantations that destroy local biodiversity. They do not develop the terminator seeds that hold farmers hostage to the seed patent rights of corporations. They are not the inventors of chemical fertilizers that worsen climate change.

Those honors belong to the very companies that President Obama is inviting to oversee Africa’s food security. We know that their primary goal is not anybody’s food security but their own bottom line. That’s why it’s governments, and not corporations like Monsanto, that should bear responsibility for funding and developing agriculture. It is simply not true that only companies can build silos and develop seeds and fertilizers.

President Obama anticipated these criticisms when he addressed “whether this New Alliance is just a way for governments to shift the burden onto somebody else.” He was quick to assure that, even in hard economic times, his administration would continue to make investments in development aid. Let’s make sure that those investments work to prioritize the right to food over corporate profits.

Because here’s the truth: we’re never going to end hunger in Africa without upholding the rights of smallholder women farmers who feed the continent and care for its ecosystems.

Yifat Susskind is the Executive Director of MADRE, an international women's human rights organization. She has worked with women’s human rights activists from Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and Africa to create programs in their communities to address women's health, violence against women, economic and environmental justice and peace building. She has also written extensively on US foreign policy and women’s human rights and her critical analysis has appeared in online and print publications such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, Foreign Policy in Focus and The W Effect: Bush’s War on Women, published by the Feminist Press in 2004. Ms. Susskind has been featured as a commentator on CNN, National Public Radio, and BBC Radio.




It's hard to have symptathy for idiots who attack publically funded research institutes. enki23 May 2012 #1
It's not hare for me. zeemike May 2012 #3
And atuism nuts "feel" that vaccines are evil. So what? enki23 May 2012 #4
No one forces you to take the vaccine zeemike May 2012 #5
I wasn't aware "public funded institutions" were such a monolith. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #7
It doesn't kill aphids - it's like an aphid 'alarm' phermone muriel_volestrangler May 2012 #27
Plants produce all kinds of defensive chemicals. Scientists study them for effects on human health. yellowcanine May 2012 #49
Your factually grounded argment is persuasive. n/t EFerrari May 2012 #6
100% agree. n/t rayofreason May 2012 #9
+1 (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #13
Oh, please, don't mislead. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #17
This research is in the UK. What does the FDA and Washington DC NickB79 May 2012 #23
Big business, altruism? Read this reporting, though it sounds like a fictional political thriller. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #25
NOTE: Posts #23 and #25 refer to Dr. Arpad Pusztai's work in the UK described in post #18. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #45
Suppression of science free of conflict of interest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arpad_Pusztai proverbialwisdom May 2012 #18
Another grossly misleading oversimplification. Not up to speed? FORBES on the CDC here. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #20
Keep your pollen out of my fields! Jeffreytaos May 2012 #10
Welcome Jeffery... zeemike May 2012 #12
So can I sue my neighbors for their grass pollen? Igel May 2012 #15
Bingo, but only if you own the pollen patent. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #34
Correction: they could sue YOU for their pollen on your property if they own the pollen patent. proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #57
Yep. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #8
Research? Jeffreytaos May 2012 #11
Is all bold the new all caps? (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #14
I was wondering the same thing... KansDem May 2012 #50
DU is not ready for the massive power of bold + caps. (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #52
Science that some people don't support = not really science? 4th law of robotics May 2012 #26
The Grahamites are staging a field burning. Someone inform AgriGen Scootaloo May 2012 #2
Bring your kink-spring guns. NickB79 May 2012 #24
I was hoping it wouldn't fly over everyone's head! Scootaloo Jun 2012 #55
Read the headline.... James48 May 2012 #16
More here: http://taketheflourback.org/ proverbialwisdom May 2012 #19
Obama to unveil plan for helping African farmers may3rd May 2012 #22
Sad. "We know that their primary goal is not anybody’s food security but their own bottom line." proverbialwisdom May 2012 #31
Again, "Unlike big companies, small-scale women farmers do NOT grab millions of acres of land proverbialwisdom May 2012 #32
He can't have it both ways. Either help Africa or help agribusiness, but they're mutually exclusive WriteWrong May 2012 #43
Is this a Monsanto lab experiment destined to african farmers? may3rd May 2012 #21
Says enhanced to fight aphids, hence it makes its own bug spray, hence, yeah Monsanto, bemildred May 2012 #28
No, it makes the natural bug "ew, don't eat this" scent that 400 other plants already do. boppers May 2012 #29
I think a lot of people are not interested in the science 4th law of robotics May 2012 #30
A lot of people had poor science educations. boppers May 2012 #33
Nice summary of absence of consensus among FDA scientists described in 2001 legal brief at link. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #35
FUD boppers May 2012 #40
Fear, uncertainty, doubt? How about independent FDA scientists being overruled by bureaucrats? proverbialwisdom May 2012 #41
Kooks don't get to run the show. boppers May 2012 #42
They already are running the show ... Nihil May 2012 #44
Selection is a slow method to find vertical mutations, variants, and interesting gene transfers. boppers May 2012 #46
I apologise. Nihil May 2012 #47
We argue in many ways. boppers May 2012 #54
You really want to go there? How's the health ofAmerica's children since the introduction of gmos? proverbialwisdom May 2012 #48
The kids are fat, happy, and able to survive a famine. boppers May 2012 #53
Not really selection vs injection. yellowcanine May 2012 #51
Roundup-ready crops do NOT fight weeds. They resist being poisoned by a broad-spectrum herbicide WriteWrong May 2012 #38
You are correct about "Roundup(c)(TM)" crops being resistant to an herbicide. boppers May 2012 #39
Senate defeats attempt to study genetically engineered salmon. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #36
That's what they get for confusing a protest with an action WriteWrong May 2012 #37
5/23/12 Press Release: American Medical Association Considers GMO Labels proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #56
The cavalry is coming. proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #58
"...AMA delegates decided to refer this resolution to a committee that would review recent science." proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Anti-GM protesters kept f...»Reply #31