Trump faces backlash for blaming ex-President George W. Bush for 9/11

[7962]

78. ANY answers provided by anyone are dismissed as CIA lies, just read them

I'm not sure of what website you're talking about, but the missile theory is so very simple. There IS video of the jet hitting the bldg, there IS damage leading to the bldg which could NOT have been left by a missile, there are REAL people who saw the jet scream across the highway to the bldg & there ARE aircraft parts recovered at the scene.
As for the other sites, we hear people say "you cant prove "X" DIDNT happen". Well, its always hard to prove a negative. The best proof is that there is so little proof of the positives the CT people look for. Remote controlled jets? Disappearing people? A missile fired from "somewhere"? "Blowing" bldg 7 HOURS after the towers fell? Why wait? Wouldnt the PERFECT time to drop #7 be at the sane time as the other 2?? Of course! No one would suspect a thing! Excessive short selling of airline stocks? Nope, there wasnt. The JEws didnt come to work? Nope, didnt happen. But yet people STILL push that!! Phone calls from the passengers were faked? Really??And the "demolition" theory? I get a little personal with this one because of my experience 2 weeks before 9/11. There was an old double smokestack near where I worked to be torn down. For TWO WEEKS a demolition crew prepared those stacks for a controlled demolition. If the WTC had explosives inside, it would have taken WEEKS and a LOT of people to actually load the building. Not to mention the fact that EVERY tv showed the buildings dropping from the TOP DOWN, which would easily cause a pancake effect. Just go loo at it again. #2 was hit later but fell first. Why? Because it was hit LOWER and had more weight above to fail. Jet fuel cant "melt steel"? Maybe not, but it didnt HAVE to "melt" it. Jet fuel burns hot enough to weaken steel by well over 50% which is more than enough to fail a structure.
The only "theory" that hasnt been debunked is that the govt did not give enough credence to the intel they had and the reports they were given. And if the reports were right, which they were, how could there ALSO be this coordinated "plan" involving hundreds, if not thousands, of people?
Oh, one more thing. Why would Osama Bin Laden constantly claim responsibility for 9/11 if he wasnt involved? Why would he want all his work to be destroyed? He had taken control of a country and pretty much been left alone. There are plenty of people who dont make money giving speeches and writing books who have explained in detail just what happened.