Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
14. I kind of doubt there would be electoral consequences here, as long as . . . .
Thu May 17, 2012, 03:05 PM
May 2012

Obama acts competently and the situation doesn't spiral completely out of control. Both Obama and Mittster would try so hard to gain any advantage that I think it would be a wash.

However, if Obama managed to make the situation demonstrably worse or didn't show decent leadership (contradictory statements, not appearing concerned, making a really unpopular decision and/or changing policies mid-stream, etc.) then there could be an opening for Romney. Of course the reverse is true too. If Mitt stumbles or seems indecisive/unsure of what to do, he could take a hit as well. My guess is that neither would make a serious mistake, though there would be more pressure on Obama since he's the CIC and would actually have to make decisions with real consequences.

What a bunch of assholes. arikara May 2012 #1
No Nukes RobertEarl May 2012 #29
A very, very nervous K&R. riderinthestorm May 2012 #2
exactly my thought. magical thyme May 2012 #3
So, what's the reason for this again? KansDem May 2012 #4
IIRC it was FogerRox May 2012 #6
We should abrogate our treaties with Israel and let them do what they have to do without Us. xtraxritical May 2012 #5
What makes you think this would be worse than Syria or Iraq? ieoeja May 2012 #7
Hezbollah, for one. Comrade Grumpy May 2012 #9
3 strikes and you're out magical thyme May 2012 #15
"Why they want to start WWIII Armageddon I can't figure." I bet that is exactly what teddy51 May 2012 #8
Highly unlikely RZM May 2012 #13
In the short-term, it would probably ignite a regional war and spike oil prices NickB79 May 2012 #20
What makes you think this will start WWIII? AverageJoe90 May 2012 #30
If they do that, I say not another dime in aid and an end to any sinkingfeeling May 2012 #10
Whew! good thing, because the price of gas was coming down. Javaman May 2012 #11
I don't know that it would be Armageddon Jackpine Radical May 2012 #12
I kind of doubt there would be electoral consequences here, as long as . . . . RZM May 2012 #14
you're more optimistic about Mittens than I am magical thyme May 2012 #16
That's entirely possible RZM May 2012 #18
"The sky is falling, the sky is falling." - Chicken Little Behind the Aegis May 2012 #17
Hawks on the attack and buzzards circling... Brooklyn Dame May 2012 #19
If Israel was truly serious abount launching an attack, we wouldn't hear about it until afterwards. Angleae May 2012 #21
Yep. People have been saying one is imminent for a decade now. 9nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #22
Very true. Perhaps this is just more posturing. AverageJoe90 May 2012 #31
... American military plans to strike Iran "ready" and option "fully available" Ghost Dog May 2012 #23
" . . window of opportunity is before the U.S. presidential election in November . . " Strelnikov_ May 2012 #24
The way (our) world ends Strelnikov_ May 2012 #25
Part 1 - Operation Muah'dib Strelnikov_ May 2012 #26
Part 2 - The Spice Processing Facilities Strelnikov_ May 2012 #27
Part 3 - The Spice Trade Strelnikov_ May 2012 #28
Why don't they attack Pakistan instead which has nukes Rosa Luxemburg May 2012 #32
Who are they kidding? They can't do jack without US support. n/t invictus May 2012 #33
I find that Israel is absolutely in self destruct mode lovuian May 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran Attack Decision Near...»Reply #14