Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
34. The prosecutor always has discretion whether and for what to charge.
Sat May 12, 2012, 02:24 PM
May 2012

At least that's the law in CA. Do you know of some law that takes away prosecutorial discretion in FL?

the 1 percent is trying to get us to go at each other leftyohiolib May 2012 #1
Something similar just happened in Collin County Texas cpamomfromtexas May 2012 #2
Someone correct me if Im wrong, but I do believe the "Prosecutors" for these two separate cases are Pachamama May 2012 #3
Someone please come and deliver us from this evil! Baitball Blogger May 2012 #5
...Seriously? Christ on a flaming pogo stick. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #10
The CNN introduction ("Saying he had ...for firing a waring shot) is inconsistent with the described AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #4
What I don't understand is why anyone would get 20 years Chemisse May 2012 #6
CNN is not reliable. She went into the house with her gun and shot at her husband. AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #9
Oh. That's different. slackmaster May 2012 #15
We have a 10 20, life law in FL, Kencorburn May 2012 #17
20 years for an abuse case makes no sense PatrynXX May 2012 #18
Because Florida has a law with a mandatory 20 year minimum specifically for this. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #22
Good to know info Texano78704 May 2012 #32
Very informative post, thanks! nt Cass May 2012 #36
She tried to leave through the garage. The garage door was not working. Cerridwen May 2012 #12
I wonder why the jury didn't see it that way. AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #13
The family said she went to have him sign insurance papers. Cerridwen May 2012 #14
She got burned for being an honest person. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #26
Because the jury is instructed that a warning shot is prima facie evidence you are not in fear for y AtheistCrusader May 2012 #23
she went into the house to retrieve her property, apparently. n/.t tru May 2012 #21
Stand Your Ground (if you're white) FreeBC May 2012 #7
+100 baldguy May 2012 #29
You gotta be kidding me tawadi May 2012 #8
WTF! L0oniX May 2012 #11
Details are missing. Bladian May 2012 #16
"Details are missing" -- and you seem to be filling them in. pacalo May 2012 #19
He's still alive. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #24
Wow, that's the first I've heard that. pacalo May 2012 #28
20 years is insane, and the prosecutor way over-charged. SunSeeker May 2012 #20
The prosecutor has no choice. The Judge has no choice. The jury has no choice. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #25
The prosecutor always has discretion whether and for what to charge. SunSeeker May 2012 #34
There is nothing wrong with the prosecutor on this case. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #27
Well, she is a second-class citizen after all. valerief May 2012 #30
To the people reading this thread Lurks Often May 2012 #31
Past time! Jury nullification education should be given to every juror. lonestarnot May 2012 #33
sorry, wrong thread! Skittles May 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Marissa Alexander) Flori...»Reply #34