Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
17. Refusal to fight in corporate imperialist wars must be part of the pushback against the 1%
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:18 PM
Mar 2015

There are very few "just" wars, and no war is really just in the last analysis. World War II is often cited as a just war, but in that case it was only just for the allies. Otherwise, it was a war started by a mad man who had no excuse, just his hate-filled delusions. The Japanese were more conventional villains than the Nazis. The Japanese went to war to expand into an empire, to subjugate nations and seize their natural resources. Control of natural wealth and trade routes are why most wars are really waged.

US wars since 1945 have been of that Japanese model. The war against Iraq most certainly was. It was a war for oil. All other rationales were just window dressing to make a war rooted in corporate greed more palatable to the American public as making it appear to be an altruistic effort to destroy a bloody tyrant and enhance national security. The only truth in that was that Saddam really was a bloody tyrant. That he was a threat to American security, or even to his weakest neighbor, were bald faced lies. That the world is a better and safer place without Saddam in power is a mantra that the architects of the war have continued to use to justify their actions as all the other reasons have fallen apart under even the slightest scrutiny. Yet even this justification is brought into question by the rise of the terrorist regime of the Islamic State, which makes Saddam look like an enlightened despot by comparison.

The fossil fuel industry is on life support. Coal and oil are dirty, polluting and unhealthy sources of energy, and this is true even before we start talking about anthropogenic climate change, something that most certainly not a hoax. Yet the private enterprises that extract these resources from the earth are given tax breaks and government subsides to do so. Renewable energy is ready to come online and supplant fossil fuels in a matter of years. There is no excuse not to begin the process to begin the process of supplementing and finally supplanting fossil fuels with solar and wind power immediately.

Therefore, there is no need to fight wars in the Middle East. There is no need to spill the blood of America's future to secure more supplies of oil for ExxonMobil or Chevron.

We must not give our lives or the lives of our children or grandchildren to be sacrificed on the alter of the fossil fuel industries. We Americans must avoid military service until a rational energy policy is adopted by the government that supposedly derives its power and authority from We, the people, not They, the pollution pimps.

So what would be "the very bad deal?" spartan61 Mar 2015 #1
Has there been one member of the press that has asked these republicans what they would do? The still_one Mar 2015 #2
Exactly Merrigay Mar 2015 #15
War litouch Mar 2015 #20
One thing the press in this country does not have is superior intelligence still_one Mar 2015 #22
Let's see, opened up Cuba... this deal could possibly open up Iran... underpants Mar 2015 #3
A very bad deal for Republicans randr Mar 2015 #4
I was first inspired to vote for Senator Obama cilla4progress Mar 2015 #5
Wait, isn't HE running against Rahm? n/t eggplant Mar 2015 #8
huh? cilla4progress Mar 2015 #13
Jesus. eggplant Mar 2015 #16
Hah cilla4progress Mar 2015 #26
republicans would rather kick the dogs of war into action Sunlei Mar 2015 #6
This has nothing to do with the deal, everything to do with doubling down Strelnikov_ Mar 2015 #7
"Masters of War" Bob Dylan tomsaiditagain Mar 2015 #9
^^^ this cilla4progress Mar 2015 #14
Refusal to fight in corporate imperialist wars must be part of the pushback against the 1% Jack Rabbit Mar 2015 #17
I don't get why they oppose a deal treestar Mar 2015 #10
We'd be a far greater country without our massive war hardon. Gregorian Mar 2015 #11
A Dangerous Idiot Turbineguy Mar 2015 #12
Don't buyt anthing this con person sells!!! El Shaman Mar 2015 #18
Mitch's Plan B: War. Your kids, not his. Vinca Mar 2015 #19
how many centrifuges is acceptable? quadrature Mar 2015 #21
And McConnells alternative is to what? Bartlet Mar 2015 #23
McConnells alternative is to try and milk the fear and terror of Iran getting a nuke cstanleytech Mar 2015 #24
F*** you mcconnell!!!!!!!! heaven05 Mar 2015 #25
Here's what I don't get ... cilla4progress Mar 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP Senate leader: Obama ...»Reply #17