Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jazzgirl

(3,744 posts)
6. Why should she respond?
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 11:47 AM
Mar 2015

The repukes used private servers the whole time they were in power and weren't asked to explain. They moved our vote over those same aeevers and nobody questioned them. Screw their questions.

I'm wondering where the Department of Justice with their grand jury indictments....... android fan Mar 2015 #1
Republicans work in numbers. Baitball Blogger Mar 2015 #5
Yes, I to would welcome the idea of her support for the Presidents efforts. As to the issue of her jwirr Mar 2015 #2
Why should she respond? Jazzgirl Mar 2015 #6
Because it is becoming a political issue - a few words from her and she can stop it in it's tracks. jwirr Mar 2015 #9
Swift Boat - that's why groundloop Mar 2015 #11
As a former Sec. of State this idea is a non starter Botany Mar 2015 #3
Exellent father founding Mar 2015 #4
Hillary isn't required to sign or not sign anything Renew Deal Mar 2015 #7
She almost has to make a statement about this during her 1:30 presser today. If she doesn't make a leveymg Mar 2015 #8
What happens if she doesn't condemn the racist bus incident? Renew Deal Mar 2015 #12
Too obscure. leveymg Mar 2015 #13
I don't agree Renew Deal Mar 2015 #14
She was Obama's Secretary of State - she has to support him on this. leveymg Mar 2015 #17
her public response should be: 'i'm not a traitor and i love America unlike those who have signed samsingh Mar 2015 #10
this dumbfuck is so far out of his league frylock Mar 2015 #15
I just sent him an e-mail lebkuchen Mar 2015 #26
Clinton does not have to say shit about shit and making this about her saying anything is ludicrous. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #16
Not so ludicrous. Others, including the GOP, are sure to point this out if she doesn't make leveymg Mar 2015 #18
Yes, she rather needs to acknowledge the letter as ridiculous and dangerous. Orsino Mar 2015 #19
Her statement today is at the UN - If she says nothing about the letter, what message does that send leveymg Mar 2015 #21
Yep. She can be dismissive if she wants... Orsino Mar 2015 #22
Just a few words would do: "I do not agree with the Senate letter, and won't sign it" leveymg Mar 2015 #24
A conditonal response is appropriate Geronimoe Mar 2015 #20
A nonconditional response is the one and only way to approach this. leveymg Mar 2015 #23
Mark Kirk is a Republican John Poet Mar 2015 #25
Thanks for pointing that out. n/t leveymg Mar 2015 #27
trashing thead #26 about Clinton. Pathwalker Mar 2015 #28
Too many happy to join the GOP bandwagon of shame...just for the attention. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #29
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #30
If Hillary signed the letter the GOP would be filming a commercial the next day. Vinca Mar 2015 #31
That one might resonate on a couple levels. leveymg Mar 2015 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOPer invites Hillary Cli...»Reply #6