You care about this if (Reply #30) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: Hillary Clinton’s Use of Private Email at State Department Raises Flags [View all]

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 12:18 AM

30. You care about this if

We had the same level of outrage when Republicans used private e-mails to communicate. Hell, let's investigate that guy's( gop.com) untimely muder. Remember when Ken Blaclwell published the official rexSlts of OHIOl under the auspices of the gop.com server?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

109 replies	Author	Time	Post
Hillary Clinton’s Use of Private Email at State Department Raises Flags [View all]	choie	Mar 2015	OP
Out of tens of thousands of emails, only 55 000 were job related? Interesting.	merrily	Mar 2015	#1
But 55,000 is tens of thousands	starroute	Mar 2015	#29
It was a big deal here when the Bush administration was caught using personal email addresses.	arcane1	Mar 2015	#2
Yes, but that's VERY different.	merrily	Mar 2015	#5
Seems as if there are a lot of things that were a big deal when they were done by the Bush admin ...	markpkessinger	Mar 2015	#56
OF COURSE THIS IS GOING TO BE A BIG DEAL!	cynzke	Mar 2015	#73
Might have been what they did with them.	aquart	Mar 2015	#57
Everyone in the Bush administration had YAHOO accounts. They don't have ANY of that stuff.	MADem	Mar 2015	#3
Her people? What? She never heard about the Bush thing or the law?	merrily	Mar 2015	#4
The Clintons are above the law, everybody knows that	krawhitham	Mar 2015	#6
Yup yup, nothing to see here - be a good Democrat now and move along.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#38
Palin did this and we crucified her. Clinton doesn't	roguevalley	Mar 2015	#47
I don't think this will make her toast.	merrily	Mar 2015	#50
I don't know about that	brush	Mar 2015	#61
Republicans and media hammered Benghazi without affecting either her desire to run or her anointing.	merrily	Mar 2015	#71
I'm definitely open to others throwing their hats in the ring.	brush	Mar 2015	#77
Did you happen to read the story at the link?	merrily	Mar 2015	#83
I did read it but went back . . .	brush	Mar 2015	#97
Wasn't it an article in which Schumer was saying Democratic primaries are undesirable? Only his pic?	merrily	Mar 2015	#98
Yeah, that was the one	brush	Mar 2015	#99
Really?? I didn't see any slide show of pics of Dem Presidential hopefuls at that link.	merrily	Mar 2015	#100
There's a link in the middle of the copy to click on. nt	brush	Mar 2015	#104
And there's the problem. How much leeway will the press give her as more of this happens?	7962	Mar 2015	#68
If she remains the anointed, she will be the nominee regardless of what the press says because	merrily	Mar 2015	#87
isn't that the truth, merrily	roguevalley	Mar 2015	#91
The GOP will make a big deal, but it will just look like politics to the general public	7962	Mar 2015	#90
The media has a way of riling up the general public, esp. rw radio and it's internet counterparts.	merrily	Mar 2015	#94
So sick of this shady crap no matter who does it.	Sheelanagig	Mar 2015	#7
Well, when you're putting pressure on the Haitian government	OnyxCollie	Mar 2015	#8
+1	whereisjustice	Mar 2015	#40
Isn't that how they nailed Petraeus?	leveymg	Mar 2015	#9
NASA?	Kelvin Mace	Mar 2015	#23
Damn auto correct. NSA it is.	leveymg	Mar 2015	#48
Payola will be the bigger issue... nt	quadrature	Mar 2015	#10
i hope it irritates the right into an eye-bulging spittle-flying tic-riddled frenzy	Romeo.lima333	Mar 2015	#11
This is what the Walker John Doe was about. He set up a private router system in his office.	postulater	Mar 2015	#12
So you're assuming criminal activity?	uberblonde	Mar 2015	#32
You know, violating the "rules of the job" is at least unethical (corrupt)	Demeter	Mar 2015	#64
Scott Wankers activities were all on persoonal E-Mails	warrant46	Mar 2015	#75
Has it occurred to anyone..	uberblonde	Mar 2015	#13
Yes, the Obama administration knew about it. They would have to, in order	TwilightGardener	Mar 2015	#14
One reporter said his Chuck Hagel FOIA request was kicked back.	uberblonde	Mar 2015	#31
Then they all need to figure out why, and look into it.	TwilightGardener	Mar 2015	#35
The POTUS' gov't email account	CANDO	Mar 2015	#17
If she needs a Presidential pardon, she'll probably get one.	merrily	Mar 2015	#51
....	DeSwiss	Mar 2015	#45
Just because a President agrees with something, or doesn't raise objection	Demeter	Mar 2015	#65
More tempests, more teapots...better put in another order.	Fred Sanders	Mar 2015	#15
Put a fork in her political career...	CANDO	Mar 2015	#16
How do you conduct State Dept. business on non-government, unsecured	TwilightGardener	Mar 2015	#18
I don't know but Lawrence O seems to think that this is big.	jwirr	Mar 2015	#19
Yeah, I'm watching Lawrence also.	CANDO	Mar 2015	#21
No offense...	uberblonde	Mar 2015	#33
My, my, my what a quick little evidence-free bunny of condemnation you are.	aquart	Mar 2015	#58
My my my....	CANDO	Mar 2015	#70
"Innocent until proven guilty" here on DU? Oh please	Lurks Often	Mar 2015	#72
Time to get someone else to run	Adenoid_Hynkel	Mar 2015	#85
Something is off ...	sunnystarr	Mar 2015	#20
Apparently HRC used private acct exclusively.	CANDO	Mar 2015	#22
WHEN did the "current regulations" go into effect?	aquart	Mar 2015	#59
2 years after she left	thelordofhell	Mar 2015	#62
BS - the gov't email for official biz requirement predates the Bush Admin. It's a law.	leveymg	Mar 2015	#76
The law did not get updated to include e-mails until after Clinton left	thelordofhell	Mar 2015	#82
The 1950 Act has been interpreted to include machine readable messages since the 1970s.	leveymg	Mar 2015	#86
The statute has covered federal records since the 1950s. The definition was probably broad enough	merrily	Mar 2015	#88
Thanks.	leveymg	Mar 2015	#92
You are welcome.	merrily	Mar 2015	#95
Who thought this was a good idea? nt	geek tragedy	Mar 2015	#24
Clearly...	uberblonde	Mar 2015	#34
We don't need this	ripcord	Mar 2015	#25
I want to wait to hear more before making a judgement but you can see the glee of some.	hrmjustin	Mar 2015	#26
Mind you, she has not been my favorite	sadoldgirl	Mar 2015	#27
Senators all have official emails. Reps, too.	merrily	Mar 2015	#52
This message was self-deleted by its author	guyton	Mar 2015	#28
"I was expecting it to be [email protected]"	CrispyQ	Mar 2015	#79
You care about this if	Old and In the Way	Mar 2015	#30
Please note.	uberblonde	Mar 2015	#36
Didn't give his stupidity a second thought. That was his problem with his constituents.	Old and In the Way	Mar 2015	#37
Actually, there was a lot of outrage from Democrats when similar news about Bushco hit. Palin, too.	merrily	Mar 2015	#53
The latest is that the law governing this...	uberblonde	Mar 2015	#39
Doubtful. Official emails = federal record. The Federal Records Act was signed in 1950.	merrily	Mar 2015	#54
this is not fatal	DonCoquixote	Mar 2015	#41
She is a lawyer and I am sure new federal hires get notice of this.	merrily	Mar 2015	#55
16 Benghazi hearings	Nuh Uh	Mar 2015	#42
That's because they all use private email.	apnu	Mar 2015	#69
What really chaps my ass is the whole "One rule for thee and another for me"	Big_Mike	Mar 2015	#43
Manning did almost the opposite of what Berger did.	karynnj	Mar 2015	#80
You people just don't understand!	DeSwiss	Mar 2015	#44
That's a funny graphic.	merrily	Mar 2015	#60
Oh, man, thats gonna piss off a few folks!!	7962	Mar 2015	#93
You win the US Internet!	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#109
This went on for years.	Mz Pip	Mar 2015	#46
I think it would be proper to ask if it's the Obama administration who prefers	TwilightGardener	Mar 2015	#49
Gee, a warmongering corporate schill fails to comply	Android3.14	Mar 2015	#63
Well said.	CrispyQ	Mar 2015	#81
You did know those weren't the laws in place when she was in office?	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#89
Do you know when someone is manipulating you?	Android3.14	Mar 2015	#96
Yes and no. The law was in place since 1950 (actually much, much earlier, but we are now working	merrily	Mar 2015	#108
Benghazi, Benghazi!!	Sancho	Mar 2015	#66
moring joe hasbeen talking most of the hour about this. Many	riversedge	Mar 2015	#67
This looks bad for her, State Dept IT, and the administration	KeepItReal	Mar 2015	#74
For a Candidate in waiting this has the appearance of some serious baggage.	Ford_Prefect	Mar 2015	#78
We're on track to get a seriously, seriously flawed candidate	Adenoid_Hynkel	Mar 2015	#84
Daily Beast proves this story is false. See links below.	Agnosticsherbet	Mar 2015	#101
except for the facts set out by a state dept employee:	elleng	Mar 2015	#102
HRC broke No Laws	fredamae	Mar 2015	#103
Wrong	Android3.14	Mar 2015	#105
Do we know they were Not	fredamae	Mar 2015	#106
will the 55K emails have a 'sequence' number ? ...nt	quadrature	Mar 2015	#107

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.