Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Secret Service revokes security clearances of 11 accused of misconduct [View all]HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)44. I suspect the fungus is distributed
amongst sundry calcetines. There are telling, sticky li'l fingerprints all over.
Glad I'm not MIRT. Have they gotten any sleep lately?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Secret Service revokes security clearances of 11 accused of misconduct [View all]
Poll_Blind
Apr 2012
OP
This is seriously f-ed up. I'm glad it happened so long before the election.
truthisfreedom
Apr 2012
#1
there are still plenty of private security/protection firms that will hire them up...
Blue_Tires
May 2012
#56
Perhaps for some sort of menial job, or as a mall cop. Even private security firms do not want
razorman
May 2012
#57
Well done. lady...I guess you told me..YESIREE... You sure put me in my place!
Liber-AL
Apr 2012
#35
There's so much wrong with your comment, it simply illustrates what I said in the first place.
MADem
Apr 2012
#37
If you are stupid enough to "get caught" doing something, then you don't belong in the service.
boppers
May 2012
#66
civilian law enforcement as well as many private security firms often require security clearances
Bacchus4.0
Apr 2012
#30
Well, it's all over but the termination letters, I'm guessing. And good enough for 'em.
MADem
Apr 2012
#26
There is no legal right to a security clearance. Download an SF-86 and read the things you answer
24601
Apr 2012
#34
You have no privacy, that's true. You're an instrument of the government, in essence.
MADem
Apr 2012
#38
So long Lie-ber-AL...it's been real, and it's been nice, but it hasn't been real nice.
MADem
Apr 2012
#40
Well, the biggest question really is going to be whether any of the women were under 18. If
24601
Apr 2012
#46
Apparently, they wanted Neiman-Marcus product at a K-Mart price--that's what did them in.
MADem
Apr 2012
#47
Right. Secret Service agents have EVERY RIGHT to get drunk and invite hookers to their hotel rooms
Nye Bevan
May 2012
#52