Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
K&R Arctic Dave Apr 2012 #1
the police industrial complex and its commander in chief will not like this or go along - cuts into msongs Apr 2012 #2
Yep - the status quo serves the for-profit prison complex AND big pharma. polichick Apr 2012 #73
Such a no-brainer. Webster Green Apr 2012 #3
I watched one of the virtual people on tv the other night trying to rationalize the administration's jtuck004 Apr 2012 #4
Smart move, best to keep your powder dry and gun ready for bigger game...... MindMover Apr 2012 #5
My questions about the meme about prohibition having ended mob rule are these: JDPriestly Apr 2012 #13
Here's a graph of the homicide rate in the USA.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #16
Interesting the second peak in homicides felix_numinous Apr 2012 #46
That's an excellent graph RainDog Apr 2012 #51
Here you go.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #53
thanks! n/t RainDog Apr 2012 #54
We don't outlaw everything that is bad for people. And alcohol is far worse for people than pot is. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #18
Setting aside the fact that marijuana is probably not as damaging to our health JDPriestly Apr 2012 #58
Are you really that uninformed? uwep Apr 2012 #19
More than that, the start (not end) of Prohibition *increased* alcohol consumption among women. ieoeja Apr 2012 #39
likewise waddirum Apr 2012 #68
Question away, of course, but those weren't expected outcomes of the prohibition jtuck004 Apr 2012 #20
Portugal seems to have had a better outcome with decriminalization RainDog Apr 2012 #23
THANK you. i was about to go google for this link, which tells the whole story 99th_Monkey Apr 2012 #44
Thanks. "a confluence of treatment and risk reduction policies." That's good news. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #59
In the case of hard drugs, dispensing needles to addicts RainDog Apr 2012 #61
there's also data from the Dutch policy RainDog Apr 2012 #24
The U.S. imprisons more people per capita than China RainDog Apr 2012 #25
And very expensively, too. nt bemildred Apr 2012 #33
Doesn't china execute their drug dealers? lupulin Apr 2012 #37
Probably JonLP24 Apr 2012 #48
the apt comparision would be drug USE, not dealing RainDog Apr 2012 #49
True - it is not a comparison lupulin Apr 2012 #65
The issue was arrests, not use. You then made the issue dealing, not arrests RainDog Apr 2012 #66
my point was merely lupulin Apr 2012 #67
my remark was veering into snark RainDog Apr 2012 #69
Do you know anyone whose parole violation duhneece Apr 2012 #71
no lupulin Apr 2012 #75
Very good points. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #60
The War on Drugs has hurt millions duhneece Apr 2012 #70
You might want to check out the Drug Policy Forum RainDog Apr 2012 #26
My questions are more along the lines of: 4th law of robotics Apr 2012 #38
the answer to that one is clear to me RainDog Apr 2012 #50
The reality is that anything that prohibits personal choice is a burden on the economy. Gregorian Apr 2012 #6
Here's the problem. TheWraith Apr 2012 #7
Hopeless and obsessed...... MindMover Apr 2012 #8
Is that really true? It would make an interesting polling question Comrade Grumpy Apr 2012 #10
I doubt it. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #17
Yes, the problem is $$$... IthinkThereforeIAM Apr 2012 #35
This isn't about "liking drugs" or not RainDog Apr 2012 #27
I have made the same argument. And it is worse. ieoeja Apr 2012 #40
Ryan Grimm was a lobbyist for MPP RainDog Apr 2012 #57
It's an election year. truthisfreedom Apr 2012 #9
It will be part of the national conversation; it's on the ballot in two states. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2012 #11
Our 3 Dem. gubernatorial candidates were asked about it in the first televised Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #14
Yeah, NC. Meanwhile, 16 States plus DC already passed Medical Marijuana laws with Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #29
And in Washington State pscot Apr 2012 #30
Well, I was responding to the prvious poster who said it won't even be part of the Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #77
I was curious and dug up the actual list of signers... bluedigger Apr 2012 #12
along with economists from Yale, Stanford and Cornell RainDog Apr 2012 #52
Did I touch a nerve or something? bluedigger Apr 2012 #55
that was my own post RainDog Apr 2012 #56
VCSU doesn't seem to be a community college Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #62
Your list is breath-taking! duhneece Apr 2012 #72
Thanks for the kind remark RainDog Apr 2012 #74
30 helens... Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #15
It only takes one lobbyist with a fat wallet that disagrees with them to keep it Dragonfli Apr 2012 #21
500 economists agreed during the Bush administration as well. RainDog Apr 2012 #22
President responds: Uh, ummm., ahhhhh....God is in the Mix! Bluenorthwest Apr 2012 #28
By their acts you shall know them pscot Apr 2012 #31
Job security is at stake: bemildred Apr 2012 #34
Ending the drug war saves US billions if not trillions of dollars anti-alec Apr 2012 #32
Kicked and recommended for common sense, logic, compassion and sanity. Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #36
Aw, Jeez, not this shit again. The Stranger Apr 2012 #41
I know what you mean, people demanding freedom, privacy, and logic based common sense policies Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #43
Too bad this will be ignored... FlyByNight Apr 2012 #42
Legalzie now! sarcasmo Apr 2012 #45
And about 530 federal level politicians disagree.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #47
Finally, 300 economists I agree with. n/t rayofreason Apr 2012 #63
Or another way to put it.....300 economists agree on something....WOW !!!!!! MindMover Apr 2012 #64
298 also want potato chips, and can we put on some Earthless? sofa king Apr 2012 #76
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Over 300 Economists Agree...»Reply #5