Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
29. No, I'm not saying it's "OK."
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 01:07 AM
Jul 2014

You can't start a thread that damns, even faintly.

If someone else starts a thread in praise, and you don't agree with the specific phrase, you can object to the characterization.

Of course, you take your chances, as I said. A jury might not like the point you're making, but that's the way the system works. The thread won't get locked so long as your post isn't the thread starter.

K/R and I hope that the changes are successful! NYC_SKP Jul 2014 #1
But everyone is still banned from the BOG, right? Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #2
Now that only 30 people have access to the Hosts forum Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #3
that just confused the hell out of me smiley Jul 2014 #4
New Rules! pscot Jul 2014 #5
No Fair - I can't spy on the Host Forum anymore groundloop Jul 2014 #6
Conspiracy!!! ColesCountyDem Jul 2014 #7
Since this change puts even more power in the hands of juries BainsBane Jul 2014 #8
Of your suggestions, only 2(c) makes any sense muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #33
It is the role of the administrators BainsBane Jul 2014 #34
Hmmm. I feel your worries about juries are tending towards the Discussionist thread muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #36
that is very good, thank you for sharing uppityperson Jul 2014 #37
that is awesome. tammywammy Jul 2014 #42
Cry like a little girl? Really? n/t Ms. Toad Jul 2014 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Jul 2014 #49
I was not talking about alert stalking BainsBane Jul 2014 #45
If you're talking, *in a thread about hosts*, about juries being about 'popularity' muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #48
I shared my suggestions BainsBane Jul 2014 #52
What it's about was: muriel_volestrangler Jul 2014 #54
Nothing you have proposed is new. pintobean Jul 2014 #50
0-7 to Leave. FYI. Agschmid Jul 2014 #51
Lol. Thanks. pintobean Jul 2014 #53
But how else to explain Capt. Obvious Jul 2014 #55
I like the changes! pacalo Jul 2014 #9
I don't like that at all--that's a negative to me. MADem Jul 2014 #11
I thought about that, too, after I hit the reply button. pacalo Jul 2014 #13
If hosts are hiding individual posts, we're back to the old moderator system--in this case that MADem Jul 2014 #16
As always, you make very good, strong points pacalo Jul 2014 #21
I think things will get better once we find ourselves in general election season. MADem Jul 2014 #23
I took threads in the new guidelines to mean OPs BainsBane Jul 2014 #35
Skinner cleared this up yesterday at post twenty--all is sorted. nt MADem Jul 2014 #39
Thanks for pointing that out to me BainsBane Jul 2014 #40
Hosts only consider the OP. Does it meet the SOP or not, replies to the OP are up to a jury. Autumn Jul 2014 #43
I agree, MADem. The rules are, in some cases, complicated. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #18
Was that intentional (i.e.. differentiating thread from OP)? I'm wondering if we are over-reading. hlthe2b Jul 2014 #14
On edit, see Skinner's reply at #20. pacalo Jul 2014 #15
Ahh, ok. Thanks, pacalo hlthe2b Jul 2014 #27
Threads means OPs. Skinner Jul 2014 #20
Thanks for clearing that up, Skinner. pacalo Jul 2014 #22
Back to the old "moderator" system then....? nt MADem Jul 2014 #10
Regarding... AsahinaKimi Jul 2014 #12
You're on your own without a co-host....that would make you the GODDESS!!!!! MADem Jul 2014 #17
it seems like any hosting decision or discussion can simply take place as an OP in the group CreekDog Jul 2014 #46
not sure thats the answer i was looking for.. AsahinaKimi Aug 2014 #56
Yes, I know it isn't the solution you need, just a suggestion CreekDog Aug 2014 #57
So no constructive criticism of Democratic Underground is allowed. JEFF9K Jul 2014 #19
No starting threads to damn/criticize, is what it says. MADem Jul 2014 #24
So you think that "damning with faint praise," as Alexander Pope ... JEFF9K Jul 2014 #28
No, I'm not saying it's "OK." MADem Jul 2014 #29
you can always go to Ask the Administrators forum nt steve2470 Jul 2014 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Jul 2014 #31
Thanks, I will look for it. JEFF9K Jul 2014 #32
Only thing left to do is get rid of the juries and DU will be in good shape. Renew Deal Jul 2014 #26
The moderation simply hid a lot of problems, and it also created a "brook no dissent" mentality. MADem Jul 2014 #30
I think the jury concept has worked and not worked and has more potential CreekDog Jul 2014 #47
Thank you for putting me on the host list but I am retiring, letting my position go to the next pers uppityperson Jul 2014 #38
you made sure that in revamping host membership that diversity was maintained? CreekDog Jul 2014 #41
Curious: what happens if people on the waitlist get a hide, and drop below 100% petronius Aug 2014 #58
I got a post hidden (Unfairly) and so I took myself off the list itsrobert Aug 2014 #59
There is no appeal BainsBane Aug 2014 #60
Either way, I still did not get a response itsrobert Aug 2014 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2014 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2014 #63
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #64
Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Announcements»We made some changes to t...»Reply #29