Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(52,185 posts)
10. Wrong wrong wrong!
Wed Nov 22, 2017, 10:02 PM
Nov 2017

Yes hillary could be made speaker as a non-member, but republicans will *never* agree to remove Donnie and pence *simultaneously*.

A new republican would be nominated and confirmed veep in between, as Gerald ford was.

That would require that the GOP lose the House in 2018. guillaumeb Nov 2017 #1
AND for the Dems to win 2/3 of the Senate shanny Nov 2017 #30
Too Much Ambition In The House Me. Nov 2017 #2
Pelosi comes to mind.... n/t dixiegrrrrl Nov 2017 #14
Yes... Mike Nelson Nov 2017 #3
What??? We have to win the house majority though, right? The Wielding Truth Nov 2017 #4
Yes, we would radical noodle Nov 2017 #5
OMFG Va Lefty Nov 2017 #6
How many times is this silly idea going to be trotted out? onenote Nov 2017 #7
Richard Painter is aware that the Speaker of the House is #3 in the order of succession, behind only pnwmom Nov 2017 #18
No, he's aware there is not a realistic scenario onenote Nov 2017 #19
In 2020 the R's might not be controlling the House any longer. I don't think anyone pnwmom Nov 2017 #38
what would be the point of an impeachment proceeding AFTER the 2020 elections? onenote Nov 2017 #39
I meant 2018, but the same principle applies. I obviously think the facts will be far more damning pnwmom Nov 2017 #42
I don't care what the fact show. The republicans will not agree to a strategy that puts a Democrat onenote Nov 2017 #44
Again, you don't think there will be the equivalent of dead bodies. I do. n/t pnwmom Nov 2017 #45
Dead bodies? Really? onenote Nov 2017 #47
I said "the equivalent" and I meant it with only slight exaggeration. pnwmom Nov 2017 #48
Nonsense. onenote Nov 2017 #49
Enough ordinary Americans will believe it that the R's will fear for their re-election chances. pnwmom Nov 2017 #50
The Republicans fear their base more than ordinary republicans onenote Nov 2017 #51
Technically that would work, except The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2017 #8
and for her to become president, several other highly unlikely events: onenote Nov 2017 #13
No, still isn't a way. brooklynite Nov 2017 #9
Pence is probably as vulnerable as Trump under Mueller's microscope. lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #41
Wrong wrong wrong! unblock Nov 2017 #10
Democrats are currently trying to distance themselves from the Clintons madville Nov 2017 #11
Do you have a source for that assertion? lapucelle Nov 2017 #32
Please stop. Ace Rothstein Nov 2017 #12
this not very well thought out idea forgets that............ Takket Nov 2017 #15
+1 onenote Nov 2017 #21
There is a way to get a Democrat in the White House before 1/20/21, but not necessarily HRC jmowreader Nov 2017 #16
In what universe would the Republicans allow this scenario? onenote Nov 2017 #20
Up that to one jmowreader Nov 2017 #34
Even so, they would work the timing so that they controlled who was his successor onenote Nov 2017 #36
Easiest way to get a Democratic President in 2018 is to get Yupster Nov 2017 #46
What more proof could anyone need that this Painter guy shouldn't be taken seriously melman Nov 2017 #17
Disagree...he's come up with good gems.. HipChick Nov 2017 #22
And yet he doesn't even know the Speaker doesn't have to be a House member onenote Nov 2017 #25
Thank goodness he's not a divider and at least R B Garr Nov 2017 #24
It seems you're not very familiar with who this guy actually is melman Nov 2017 #35
He sure has a good handle on priorities. R B Garr Nov 2017 #40
Yep, Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2017 #27
Yes, why on earth would anyone take a board member of this organization seriously? lapucelle Nov 2017 #33
Post removed Post removed Nov 2017 #23
Plans with low probability of success are a waste of time Loki Liesmith Nov 2017 #26
Plans with "no" probability of success ClarendonDem Nov 2017 #29
What's with the "sic" after "chuse"? former9thward Nov 2017 #28
OFFS Stinky The Clown Nov 2017 #31
Remember Nixon Agneau karynnj Nov 2017 #37
No. Lil Missy Nov 2017 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There IS a way for Hillar...»Reply #10