Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Uh---a minor point about Ms. Tweeden's veracity--- [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)104. It goes directly to her character, and thus her credibility.
She is not only appearing on Fox, whose product is literally 24/7 lies and deception, but in agreeing to serve as a distraction from what congress is doing she is actively involved in perpetrating this incredibly evil crime against America.
I couldn't trust her to feed my cat. With all these warnings of bad character, anything that happened would be my fault.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you have hundreds of photographs of you not touching things that you wound up touching afterward?
George II
Nov 2017
#91
The photo proves it was a gag..a joke. Now whether one finds it funny or not is another story.
Kirk Lover
Nov 2017
#63
There would, indeed, be a flaw in my reasoning IF I had suggested that the photo
Atticus
Nov 2017
#69
If you're reduced to arguing "his hands weren't on her breasts, they were hovering over them,"
Denzil_DC
Nov 2017
#26
If she is reduced to saying that a photo shows what it clearly does not, SHE IS NOT HELPING and
Atticus
Nov 2017
#83
Are we selling Al Franken's superpowers short? Maybe he has to ability to
bagelsforbreakfast
Nov 2017
#34
Well, Al is making light of "groping" in that photo. It's certainly not a crime, but I wouldn't
Hoyt
Nov 2017
#47
If I had room, I would have put "at a minimum, he's making a joke of something inappropriate."
Hoyt
Nov 2017
#64
There are at least two witnesses. The man sitting to the right, and the photographer.
pnwmom
Nov 2017
#79
A picture is less than one second in time. Less than a second later he could have been touching her.
boston bean
Nov 2017
#55
Listening to Leeann Tweeden's account during her press conference and some phrases stuck out...
CincyDem
Nov 2017
#59
No, he's not touching her. It's a joke. The gang would punk each other when asleep.
Honeycombe8
Nov 2017
#66
Been reading various threads on DU about this topic for the past few hours
ClarendonDem
Nov 2017
#76
I would say that the whole story was cooked up around that one photo by
The_Casual_Observer
Nov 2017
#102