Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
31. If you get health care from your employer, you don't see yourself paying for premiums...
Thu Sep 14, 2017, 09:50 AM
Sep 2017

...it's a line on your paycheck, but you don't see it as part of your income that you're paying out.

The big problem with a switch-over is that there's no guarantee that the new taxation will be less than what you/your employer are covering today.

Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #1
No, it is not. guillaumeb Sep 2017 #2
Did he really say premiums would go away? Control-Z Sep 2017 #3
Yes he did there should be a video soon wasupaloopa Sep 2017 #4
Premiums would be replaced by big tax increases. Probably worth it, but I keep thinking about Hoyt Sep 2017 #6
Just a couple of quibles Egnever Sep 2017 #8
As I understand it, the necessary tax hike was more than any legislator had the guts to Hoyt Sep 2017 #10
Both of them faced similar problems I think Egnever Sep 2017 #12
I think California is plenty big, and they've been a leader in healthcare reform. But they Hoyt Sep 2017 #13
So you dismiss that the federal government plays a huge role in healthcare? Egnever Sep 2017 #14
No, but California even investigated getting a waiver to pool current Medicare, Medicaid, etc., Hoyt Sep 2017 #19
Even with the waiver Egnever Sep 2017 #20
Please explain how an employer might lose a "tax break" if they didn't have to pay as much toward Hoyt Sep 2017 #23
I will try Egnever Sep 2017 #43
Where does the government pay companies to provide insurance? Hoyt Sep 2017 #56
California doesn't administer Medicare. That in itself is an impediment KPN Sep 2017 #33
Medi-Cal is a pretty big system -- 12.5 million beneficiaries. And California has been a the Hoyt Sep 2017 #40
Nobody's ignoring the issues. KPN Sep 2017 #42
Have you ever consider the job losses involved? I tell you single payer won't work. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #21
Have you considered the jobs that would be created as a result of a KPN Sep 2017 #34
That of course is one of the huge difficulties Egnever Sep 2017 #44
Yay Not Ruth Sep 2017 #52
It's actually pretty important that people think of premiums as going away... TCJ70 Sep 2017 #5
Agreed Egnever Sep 2017 #15
Well...it won't be that way for everybody... TCJ70 Sep 2017 #16
Fair enough Egnever Sep 2017 #17
People hate taxes and will not go for it...particularly those with employer based insurance. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #22
Look, I get it. But Hillary isn't president so you don't have to push to her "Never gonna happen"... TCJ70 Sep 2017 #26
First of all, in theory it might. Two different single payer bills will involve different details. StevieM Sep 2017 #46
Actually...she did say that... TCJ70 Sep 2017 #48
She was referring to the upcoming administration. She wasn't making a sweeping statement about StevieM Sep 2017 #49
Here's another quote: TCJ70 Sep 2017 #50
You're picking out words in order to make a point that is not consistent with what the debate was. StevieM Sep 2017 #51
Some people hate taxes. Many people have been conditioned to oppose taxes KPN Sep 2017 #35
If you get health care from your employer, you don't see yourself paying for premiums... brooklynite Sep 2017 #31
That's why the conversation needs to continue... TCJ70 Sep 2017 #32
Some folks' ox will be gored for sure. KPN Sep 2017 #37
Employer can still pay tokalion Sep 2017 #53
I think a good number of folks here don't understand how Medicare works. Currently we pay into still_one Sep 2017 #7
Thank you for your post. If Bernie intends wasupaloopa Sep 2017 #11
Excellent post. Hoyt Sep 2017 #24
I am on Medicare. Medicare Part B which costs me $107/month KPN Sep 2017 #38
As I understand it, a Medi-Gap or supplemental policies sold after January 1, 2006, do not include still_one Sep 2017 #41
Its free college all over again. nt LexVegas Sep 2017 #9
Many nations provide universal coverage without single payer... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #18
+1. "I don't care how we get there." Hoyt Sep 2017 #27
Yup. ismnotwasm Sep 2017 #29
We need to see the plan scored by CBO or a dispassionate and independent think tank. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #36
I am surprised CBO, or some other creditable group, have not done that. Hoyt Sep 2017 #39
while I'd love to see a single payer system NewJeffCT Sep 2017 #30
I doubt it would be that same as it is now. alarimer Sep 2017 #25
Another one of my concerns ismnotwasm Sep 2017 #28
There is rationing in every system Egnever Sep 2017 #45
Won't the system get overtaxed? MichMan Sep 2017 #54
BINGO! Because we KNOW the government is REALLY good at keeping tabs on where money goes snooper2 Sep 2017 #58
A lot of people here still don't understand it HarmonyRockets Sep 2017 #47
Why isn't his financing plan included in the bill? Senators, both Democratic and republican.... George II Sep 2017 #57
The GOP will use this to demonize us and we will lost our chance in 18 and 20...stupid and more Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't understand Bernie...»Reply #31