Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
21. Interesting how much confusion there seems to be about that.
Tue Aug 8, 2017, 02:38 PM
Aug 2017

It seems intentional -although it could very well be an honest misunderstanding of the term.

DURec leftstreet Aug 2017 #1
Hate to admit this - it is the first time I heard of them... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #2
Yes, but we also have a long and ugly tradition of Americans hating and fearing socialism DavidDvorkin Aug 2017 #3
Also from the article: Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #4
I think your statement could be turned around. George II Aug 2017 #93
I think that among younger people, this isn't as much of a factor. David__77 Aug 2017 #5
But a new love of Russian dictators and oligarchs Generic Other Aug 2017 #24
Indeed; very strange. DavidDvorkin Aug 2017 #35
Years of unbridled Spencerian capitalism Generic Other Aug 2017 #40
Is that paraphrasing Pat Robertson? Ninsianna Aug 2017 #6
FDR is the founder of the modern Democratic party Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #7
Just out of curiosity ... Tavarious Jackson Aug 2017 #8
You will learn more if you research that yourself... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #10
Lower than Eisenhower higher than now Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #11
In 1935 the top rate was 63% and 33% on Capital Gains. They're about 40% and 20% now. George II Aug 2017 #79
Well, not under FDR, but just afterward: JHB Aug 2017 #117
Agreed...! Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #9
This is The Big Lie... Expecting Rain Aug 2017 #16
Right Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #17
FDR never called himself a Democratic Socialist. Expecting Rain Aug 2017 #18
He was also trying to recover from the worst world depression in history. George II Aug 2017 #80
The only way to do so is at the ballot box GulfCoast66 Aug 2017 #25
Thanks! Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #27
Tell me again why you guys are using DU for this venture? DU...whose rules are very straightforward. Tarheel_Dem Aug 2017 #111
Nope. Ninsianna Aug 2017 #28
Do you believe in unions? Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #29
Do you believe that proselytization and taking over a party that you claim should reflect Ninsianna Aug 2017 #37
Maybe an understanding of the term would fend of further ignorance of anybody who uses it Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #41
Mabye an understanding of the organziation being discussed here would Ninsianna Aug 2017 #43
More like the 1930s, almost 90 years ago in a completely different time. George II Aug 2017 #81
Thanks for the correction. Ninsianna Aug 2017 #99
At least I didn't correct your spelling: George II Aug 2017 #102
But he didn't correct my spelling, he just proved that he couldn't figure out what Ninsianna Aug 2017 #104
Many has been a time that I left out a vowel or two in order to keep my post within the title. George II Aug 2017 #110
I was just typing fast and have become way too reliant on that wavy little line under Ninsianna Aug 2017 #115
that will come as a surprise to the 40% of Republican union members in this BainsBane Aug 2017 #69
My Democratic Party membership is worth EXACTLY as much as yours. Nevernose Aug 2017 #107
Then why do so many people think theirs is worth more and that the rest of us Ninsianna Aug 2017 #114
The New Deal was the product of an unprecedented series of events from the 1920s to 1932. George II Aug 2017 #77
If the socialists have so much support and so many thousands, why don't they form their own party?.. socialist_n_TN Aug 2017 #23
It is much like the Libertarians in that they will never be in power wasupaloopa Aug 2017 #50
There's The Question Me. Aug 2017 #85
Actually, most of the socialist left doesn't want a "socialist" party.......... socialist_n_TN Aug 2017 #123
No thanks, I oppose government control of the means of production. Foamfollower Aug 2017 #12
Democratic socialism is giving workers more control of the means of production (ie unions) Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #26
You seem to be a little confused here. Democratic socialism at a concept is not Ninsianna Aug 2017 #42
I may be. However Unions are all but dead. Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #46
Funny how the Unions don't agree. Ninsianna Aug 2017 #65
35% of households in 1945 had union membership Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #74
And the DSA has done what to address this? Ninsianna Aug 2017 #98
It is is clear you aren't interested in a meaningful debate at the moment. Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #101
What's clear is that meanignful debate is not your intent, or you'd try to stay on topic Ninsianna Aug 2017 #103
Go to the DSA website and their history.... George II Aug 2017 #105
How many people did their convention draw in? Ninsianna Aug 2017 #109
Prolly* because there was no free Ben & Jerry ice cream in the lobby. (*probably) George II Aug 2017 #113
lol Ninsianna Aug 2017 #118
Perhaps the DSA could run their own candidates and show us how popular they are... brooklynite Aug 2017 #108
"Right to a decent job"...How is "decent" defined in this context, who defines "decent"? The state? Marengo Aug 2017 #13
The worker (ie unions) Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #30
Would this "right" be added to our Constitution? Marengo Aug 2017 #52
I'm a DSA member and I hope to see the org grow even more in the coming years. DemocraticWing Aug 2017 #14
"Democratic Socialism" not 'socialism'... there is a big difference... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #15
Tell it to Hugo Chavez Expecting Rain Aug 2017 #19
No, democratic socialism is the solution. Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #20
The relgious dogma is breathtaking. Pat would be proud. Ninsianna Aug 2017 #44
What's 'relgious'? Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #47
If you're actually having a hard time figuring out what typo that left out a single letter means, Ninsianna Aug 2017 #62
Lol... JHan Aug 2017 #70
People obsessing over typos? How 1990s un-netique! George II Aug 2017 #100
This message was self-deleted by its author Ninsianna Aug 2017 #106
To what? George II Aug 2017 #83
Please check out on your own the difference between Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #22
Also Hugo Chavez oppressed and destroyed unions Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #31
It must be frustrating to equate two different political parties from two different nations LanternWaste Aug 2017 #32
And if you're talking about the US vs. Denmark, two totally different economies, two totally.. George II Aug 2017 #84
Interesting how much confusion there seems to be about that. Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #21
Yes the intentional conflation of the term and the topic under discussion sure is confusing. Ninsianna Aug 2017 #45
Excuse me, but you must have mistaken me for somebody who doesn't know the definition of Foamfollower Aug 2017 #66
Yeah, run a socialist in say, Kentucky... Blue_Tires Aug 2017 #33
There is no 'socialist' running or in office that I am aware of... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #34
Fine, run one of those in the South Blue_Tires Aug 2017 #36
Beto o rourke Tiggeroshii Aug 2017 #38
Interesting how things topic has so many negative posts DBoon Aug 2017 #39
I see many members not agreeing with very high post counts. sheshe2 Aug 2017 #121
You know perfectly well calling people out is not allowed DBoon Aug 2017 #124
Democratic Socialism has a branding problem. Dark n Stormy Knight Aug 2017 #48
Far too many Americans are dumber than dirt... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #49
Yep. Which explains how so many Rs get elected. Dark n Stormy Knight Aug 2017 #53
Exactly. You made a very good point that I also subscribe to... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #54
I'd say many Americans are rightfully fearful of words whose meanings they understand precisely well Expecting Rain Aug 2017 #56
Democratic Socialism is what the Constitution of the USA also describes... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #57
What lies. Expecting Rain Aug 2017 #58
So FDR is now a framer of the Constituion which somehow now describes Ninsianna Aug 2017 #122
Excuse me? Dumber than dirt???? George II Aug 2017 #75
Thanks malaise Aug 2017 #51
I would probably never join the DSA. Willie Pep Aug 2017 #55
If DSA ever gained actual power, I would fight against them to my dying breath. Foamfollower Aug 2017 #112
I think you're safe on that front. Ninsianna Aug 2017 #119
That tradition goes back even further. LWolf Aug 2017 #59
I like your graphic... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #60
In the late 19th century, LWolf Aug 2017 #63
Thanks for the history lesson! Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #64
no apologies LWolf Aug 2017 #67
None of those groups were socialist BainsBane Aug 2017 #71
Maybe it's hipster irony... lapucelle Aug 2017 #61
What Do They Do With The Money? Me. Aug 2017 #86
Protest signage? A portable printing press? lapucelle Aug 2017 #96
Could Be Any Of Those...Or Not :) Me. Aug 2017 #97
All the way to a Republican win. Nt. MonkeyC Aug 2017 #68
The author doesn't seem to realize that Sanders pointed to a Social Democrat BainsBane Aug 2017 #72
Thank you Bains for correcting the record. sheshe2 Aug 2017 #78
Denmark is a tiny country, smaller than 41 of the 50 United States, with GDP about.... George II Aug 2017 #73
THIS! sheshe2 Aug 2017 #76
Socialism, "democratic" or otherwise, is not what Denmark has DFW Aug 2017 #87
And yet Denmark is repeatedly put up as the model of "Democratic Socialism" by... George II Aug 2017 #88
I know. It irks the Danes, too DFW Aug 2017 #92
Social Democracy is similar to Democratic Socialist in that... Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #89
Even if they believe in the Great Pumpkin DFW Aug 2017 #91
Wrong. Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #94
The Constitution also doesn't mention 'social', 'socialism' or even 'democracy' NobodyHere Aug 2017 #116
For younger folks, here are the names of some good people in the U.S. socialist tradition: Ken Burch Aug 2017 #82
While I like John on a personal basis DFW Aug 2017 #90
See my post # 94 Trial_By_Fire Aug 2017 #95
I do not find "socialism" or "capitalism" to be useful distinctions at times. David__77 Aug 2017 #120
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"America Has a Long and S...»Reply #21