Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(40,204 posts)

3. Anyone want to take bets?

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 12:34 PM

Jul 2017

In the next week or so, do we find out that the 9th or 10th person in the room was Donald J. Trump?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Olbermann: If "most" would have, you did...didn't you? [View all] Miles Archer Jul 2017 OP

I was thinking the same thing when I read the Trumpster's tweet this AM. crazylikafox Jul 2017 #1

He knew and approved for sure. BSdetect Jul 2017 #2

That's a terrible defense FakeNoose Jul 2017 #13

Anyone want to take bets? madaboutharry Jul 2017 #3

Exactly. MFM008 Jul 2017 #4

Most would have. Orsino Jul 2017 #6

Note the framing: oppo research gratuitous Jul 2017 #7

if trump sr. wasn't there, there were no politicians in the meeting. spanone Jul 2017 #8

Yes that's a good point FakeNoose Jul 2017 #14

No, it's not "politics." It's republican treason Achilleaze Jul 2017 #9

You Betcha malaise Jul 2017 #10

Bingo malaise Jul 2017 #12

Actually that's "business" TexasBushwhacker Jul 2017 #15

EVEN IF ACCURATE (NOT, THOUGH!), it is still criminal activity. WinkyDink Jul 2017 #16