Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(46,026 posts)

10. Without evidence of its own, CNN/AC could only push back on the attorney so much.

Sat Jul 15, 2017, 07:42 AM

Jul 2017

All they have is what's on the record and logic. And the attorney was using every device of fallacy to sidestep the issues.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If they put them on complete blast they won't come back... Baconator Jul 2017 #1

Is that a bad thing? HipChick Jul 2017 #2

It's tempting to say no... Baconator Jul 2017 #12

which party owns the media, essentially? NRaleighLiberal Jul 2017 #3

He was pushing back. If you are talking about the Trump lawyer. Not applegrove Jul 2017 #4

He pushed back on that grifter as hard Gabi Hayes Jul 2017 #7

need you ask? LOL pangaia Jul 2017 #5

Ali Velshi doesn't let them get away with much. Hieronymus Jul 2017 #8

Think for a minute of where all of this Trumpy stuff would be... Eyeball_Kid Jul 2017 #9

AC could've brought up his family religious scam Gabi Hayes Jul 2017 #13