Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Taxing wealth is the next logical step [View all]NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)87. My plant used to hire 200 new workers in one day
Want to know what those new workers did soon after they were hired?
They went out and purchased cars, houses, furniture and appliances with the money from the new job they had.
Know what they would have been purchasing without that new job?
Nothing.
See how it works?
This is really not rocket science if someone gives it just a little bit of thought.
This is about as basic as it gets.
Don
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
135 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Extremely obvious. Shows how bought are government and institutions are as a society. nt
PufPuf23
Jul 2012
#3
Businesses can either invest it themselves hiring workers or the government will tax them and do it
NNN0LHI
Jul 2012
#9
That's just verbiage for a 'wealth tax' (or a 'tax on savings'). The idea
coalition_unwilling
Jul 2012
#27
Probably not a gold coin worth significantly less than what you're taking from them.
Blanks
Jul 2012
#90
Wow, that's what the Libertarians say. Fortunately history doesn't support you.
Zalatix
Jul 2012
#58
If you have a Billion in cash in the bank, you're not "relying on receivables"...
lastlib
Jul 2012
#30
Ummm, that's what I said. You save the cash so you don't have to rely on receivables
TBMASE
Jul 2012
#45
Tax all inheritances above $5 million at 100%. Tax all transfers of money out of the country at 200%
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#15
If they want to go, they should go - but without the protection of the U.S. laws.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#34
No, it's called social democracy, and it works pretty damn well Canada and Western Europe
Hippo_Tron
Jul 2012
#128
I am against a wealth tax, per se. But our progressive tax system is a wealth tax, to some degree.
Honeycombe8
Jul 2012
#41
couple this with a repeal of the income tax and you've got a capitalist economist's wet dream
unblock
Jul 2012
#52
A flat tax on wealth of 2% per year will raise $1 trillion, and solve our budget problems.
reformist2
Jul 2012
#54
Don has a great idea here! The FIRST step would be for people to stop putting 1%ers in Congress.
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#56
A wealth tax is a taking. If you want that then you have to change the Constitution.
AngryAmish
Jul 2012
#61
Property taxes are used to finance vital government services, not general wealth redistribution
slackmaster
Jul 2012
#76
That was the logic we used to follow. Until Reagan and Trickle Down Economics.
Overseas
Jul 2012
#62
Hire new workers to do what? Why would a business owner hire new workers if he didn't need them?
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#79
So, your company hired and paid new workers they didn't need just so they could go out and purchase
SlimJimmy
Jul 2012
#101
"Taxing WEALTH ... is the most radical idea I can think of short of armed revolution"....
Junkdrawer
Jul 2012
#93
not happening. who will do the taxing when the potential taxees own and fund the potential taxors?
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#134