Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
11. Oh, okay...I was like, how could Elleng know this before RACHEL? The top Russiagate
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:16 PM
Jun 2017

expert! I misinterpreted your post...

Yes, Rosenstein will have to recuse, elleng Jun 2017 #1
Rachel acted like this was completely new to her... Amaryllis Jun 2017 #3
Yes, Ari mentioned it a few minutes before end of the show. elleng Jun 2017 #8
How is it you knew this before Rachel! Or that she didn't know. She is so often first on this stuff. Amaryllis Jun 2017 #7
I sure as heck didn't know it, Amaryllis, elleng Jun 2017 #10
Oh, okay...I was like, how could Elleng know this before RACHEL? The top Russiagate Amaryllis Jun 2017 #11
HAD I kept up with things as Ari does, elleng Jun 2017 #13
Well...it is logical that he would have to recuse himself...I still wonder why Rachel seemed Amaryllis Jun 2017 #15
Not sure that this is good news GeoWilliam750 Jun 2017 #29
I think she'll do her job properly, elleng Jun 2017 #30
She could've done a whole segment on that little tidbit NightWatcher Jun 2017 #2
Got that tidbit 10 minutes before her show was over. eom a kennedy Jun 2017 #5
That's what she and Lawrence both indicated...like Ari just had to get that out before Rachel Amaryllis Jun 2017 #6
I thought recusal was a choice? SHRED Jun 2017 #4
It's a choice until it becomes a forced recusal. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2017 #32
Haven't heard Alan Dershowitz chime in with his two cents all day. oasis Jun 2017 #9
Good! No wonder I was able to stay on one channel. I did not realize it until now. BigmanPigman Jun 2017 #20
I thought that was already out there. Rosenstein had said that moonscape Jun 2017 #12
Well...that makes sense. But Rachel sure seemed surprised. I wonder why? Amaryllis Jun 2017 #14
Maybe because it hadn't gotten to that point yet? Mueller questioned moonscape Jun 2017 #16
I believe Ari's point was that if Rosenstein is indeed a witness for Mueller... FreepFryer Jun 2017 #17
THat's what I got too. Still, I thought there must be something new about it given both Amaryllis Jun 2017 #18
I think it's because we have been focusing on Rosenstein being the empowered one to fire Mueller... FreepFryer Jun 2017 #19
Well, we know what Rachel will be discussing tomorrow! And likely will have Ari on again. Amaryllis Jun 2017 #21
She's extremely intelligent, but not omniscient Generic Brad Jun 2017 #26
From what I've read, Rachel Brand had more Republican support than Democratic.. AntiFascist Jun 2017 #22
She's very conservative, but I don't get the sense she's a Robert Bork marylandblue Jun 2017 #24
Boente is the one who makes me nervous. President Obama removed him from the line of succession... FreepFryer Jun 2017 #25
I have read that It was a ruse...Obama did it to make Boente attractive to *45...betting that *45 MedusaX Jun 2017 #27
If so, wow. Just wow :) (n/t) FreepFryer Jun 2017 #28
Not much chance of that. Patterson Jun 2017 #31
I think Rachel was surprised because the WaPo article came out late this afternoon marylandblue Jun 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did you hear Ari just say...»Reply #11